RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      한국판 섬망 평가 척도의 표준화 = Standardization of the Korean Version of Delirium Rating Scale

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40028123

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objectives : Delirium s a highly prevalent disease that occurs in about 1 5 2 0 % of all general admissions to hospital but there is no standardized rating scale that identifies and assesses the symptom severity for delirium in Korea. The Deliruim Rating Scale (DRS) is a widely used delirium rating instrument that specifically, sensitively, and reliably measures delirium symptoms. This study addresses the reliability and validity of Korean version of Delirium Rating Scale(K-DRS) in Korea.
      Methods : 28 patients with delirium, 28 patients with dementia, 27 patients with schizophrenia, and 21 patients with other mental disorder by DSM-IV entered this study All patients received a structured psychopathology assessment including K-DRS Korean version of Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE-K) Clinical Global Impression scale(CG1) and in addition schizophrenia group had done Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRSI Each instrument scores were compared among the four diagnostic groups by one-way analysis of variance with post hoc comparisons to determine where the difference lie K-DRS scores were compared with 'after usual treatment' scores in a subset of delirious subjects Cutoff scores for K-DRS were determined by using receiver-operator Characteristic (ROC) analyses to determine acceptable levels of sensitivity and specificity Inter-subtest Pearson's correlations, Cronbach's alpha coefficient to assess internal consistency and inter-rater reliability were used for the assessment of reliability of K-DRS.
      Results : The mean K-DRS score was significantly higher in the delirium group compared with each of the other groups, But mean MMSE-K score was not significantly different between delirium and dementia group Area under curve of K-DRS was 0 998K E=0.002) and its optimal cutoff point for delirium was estimated as 16 5 KDRS score after usual treatment improved from a mean(S.D) of 23 5(3.2) to 3.1(1.7) indicating an ability to measure the severity of delirium K-DRS was found to have significantly high internal consistency(Cronbach's alpha coefficient=0.88) inter-rater reliability (r=0.98 p<0.0001)
      Conclusion : We confirmed that K-DRS is a reliable valid, and useful diagnostic instrument for delirium.
      번역하기

      Objectives : Delirium s a highly prevalent disease that occurs in about 1 5 2 0 % of all general admissions to hospital but there is no standardized rating scale that identifies and assesses the symptom severity for delirium in Korea. The Deliruim Rat...

      Objectives : Delirium s a highly prevalent disease that occurs in about 1 5 2 0 % of all general admissions to hospital but there is no standardized rating scale that identifies and assesses the symptom severity for delirium in Korea. The Deliruim Rating Scale (DRS) is a widely used delirium rating instrument that specifically, sensitively, and reliably measures delirium symptoms. This study addresses the reliability and validity of Korean version of Delirium Rating Scale(K-DRS) in Korea.
      Methods : 28 patients with delirium, 28 patients with dementia, 27 patients with schizophrenia, and 21 patients with other mental disorder by DSM-IV entered this study All patients received a structured psychopathology assessment including K-DRS Korean version of Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE-K) Clinical Global Impression scale(CG1) and in addition schizophrenia group had done Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRSI Each instrument scores were compared among the four diagnostic groups by one-way analysis of variance with post hoc comparisons to determine where the difference lie K-DRS scores were compared with 'after usual treatment' scores in a subset of delirious subjects Cutoff scores for K-DRS were determined by using receiver-operator Characteristic (ROC) analyses to determine acceptable levels of sensitivity and specificity Inter-subtest Pearson's correlations, Cronbach's alpha coefficient to assess internal consistency and inter-rater reliability were used for the assessment of reliability of K-DRS.
      Results : The mean K-DRS score was significantly higher in the delirium group compared with each of the other groups, But mean MMSE-K score was not significantly different between delirium and dementia group Area under curve of K-DRS was 0 998K E=0.002) and its optimal cutoff point for delirium was estimated as 16 5 KDRS score after usual treatment improved from a mean(S.D) of 23 5(3.2) to 3.1(1.7) indicating an ability to measure the severity of delirium K-DRS was found to have significantly high internal consistency(Cronbach's alpha coefficient=0.88) inter-rater reliability (r=0.98 p<0.0001)
      Conclusion : We confirmed that K-DRS is a reliable valid, and useful diagnostic instrument for delirium.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.62 0.62 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.7 0.64 1.34 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼