RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    사회복지전공 대학생들의 내부고발에 대한 긍정적 인식 및 부정적 인식이 사회복지조직의 내부고발자에 대한 평가에 미치는 영향 = A Study on the effect of social work students" supportive or critical perceptions toward whistle-blowing on their evaluations for whistle-blowers within the social welfare organization - Focused on the mediating effect of the evaluation regarding blowing the whistle on exam cheating and the moderating effect of ability to control

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103054911

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The research is based on a survey conducted with 954 university students majoring in social welfare. The study aims at verifying the effects of the students" supportive or critical perceptions toward whistle-blowing on their evaluations for whistle-blowers with the mediation effect of the evaluation regarding blowing the whistle on exam cheating and the moderation effect of ability to control. The notable findings are as follows: First, the level of supportive perceptions toward whistle-blowing is higher than that of critical perceptions. The whistle-blowers in social welfare organization is a bit more positively evaluated than the whistle-blowers about exam cheating among the respondent. Second, students with relatively high ability of control show generally higher score than students with low ability of control in the scale of main variables above. Lastly, among people with low ability to conrol, all the paths of direct and indirect effects on the evaluations for whistle-blowers are significant, however, the direct effect of critical perceptions toward whistle-blowing and the mediation effect of the evaluation regarding blowing the whistle on exam cheating on their evaluations for whistle-blowers within the social welfare organization are not significant among people with high ability of control, Therefore, the moderation effect is proved acording to the level of ability to control. Some practical implications are discussed based on the study"s findings.
    번역하기

    The research is based on a survey conducted with 954 university students majoring in social welfare. The study aims at verifying the effects of the students" supportive or critical perceptions toward whistle-blowing on their evaluations for whistle-bl...

    The research is based on a survey conducted with 954 university students majoring in social welfare. The study aims at verifying the effects of the students" supportive or critical perceptions toward whistle-blowing on their evaluations for whistle-blowers with the mediation effect of the evaluation regarding blowing the whistle on exam cheating and the moderation effect of ability to control. The notable findings are as follows: First, the level of supportive perceptions toward whistle-blowing is higher than that of critical perceptions. The whistle-blowers in social welfare organization is a bit more positively evaluated than the whistle-blowers about exam cheating among the respondent. Second, students with relatively high ability of control show generally higher score than students with low ability of control in the scale of main variables above. Lastly, among people with low ability to conrol, all the paths of direct and indirect effects on the evaluations for whistle-blowers are significant, however, the direct effect of critical perceptions toward whistle-blowing and the mediation effect of the evaluation regarding blowing the whistle on exam cheating on their evaluations for whistle-blowers within the social welfare organization are not significant among people with high ability of control, Therefore, the moderation effect is proved acording to the level of ability to control. Some practical implications are discussed based on the study"s findings.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 문헌고찰
    • 3. 연구방법
    • 4. 분석결과
    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 문헌고찰
    • 3. 연구방법
    • 4. 분석결과
    • 5. 결론 및 제언
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼