RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    전통적 사회적 기업의 기능상 한계와 그에 대한 대응방안 - 영리추구 사회적 기업의 도입을 중심으로 - = Functional limitations and countermeasures of traditional social enterprises

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108925216

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Social enterprises have emerged to solve various social problems such as polarization, aging society, and environmental problems that arise in a capitalist market economy centered on efficiency and competition. In particular, as the global financial crisis continues, A co-operative union as a traditional social enterprise, is attracting attention as an alternative model. However, several questions are raised as to whether A co-operatives union will be sustainable as competitive social enterprise in the capitalist market economy. The reason is that A Co-operative union is a business organization and has duality as organizations that realize social purposes, and despite their unique organizational characteristics different from stock companies, these characteristics are not properly reflected.
    Accordingly, a new type of social enterprise was requested to reflect these characteristics and perform its functions and roles properly. Therefore, this paper attempted to review Low profit limited liability Company(L3C), B-cob certification company, and Benefit Corporation in the United States as new types of social enterprises that realize social purposes and values and can operate sustainably without government support.
    Unlike Europe, these system is basically a profit-seeking social enterprise centered on companies, not on the state or government, and it is a company that has independent type and autonomous operation that is not governed by the government. I think there is a limit to the European social enterprise model in order to properly perform its function and role as a social enterprise.
    Therefore, I have reviewed a new form of social enterprise in the United States, which can substantially and continuously perform the roles and functions requested above. And I looked at what problems under the current legal system would be considered if it were introduced.
    번역하기

    Social enterprises have emerged to solve various social problems such as polarization, aging society, and environmental problems that arise in a capitalist market economy centered on efficiency and competition. In particular, as the global financial c...

    Social enterprises have emerged to solve various social problems such as polarization, aging society, and environmental problems that arise in a capitalist market economy centered on efficiency and competition. In particular, as the global financial crisis continues, A co-operative union as a traditional social enterprise, is attracting attention as an alternative model. However, several questions are raised as to whether A co-operatives union will be sustainable as competitive social enterprise in the capitalist market economy. The reason is that A Co-operative union is a business organization and has duality as organizations that realize social purposes, and despite their unique organizational characteristics different from stock companies, these characteristics are not properly reflected.
    Accordingly, a new type of social enterprise was requested to reflect these characteristics and perform its functions and roles properly. Therefore, this paper attempted to review Low profit limited liability Company(L3C), B-cob certification company, and Benefit Corporation in the United States as new types of social enterprises that realize social purposes and values and can operate sustainably without government support.
    Unlike Europe, these system is basically a profit-seeking social enterprise centered on companies, not on the state or government, and it is a company that has independent type and autonomous operation that is not governed by the government. I think there is a limit to the European social enterprise model in order to properly perform its function and role as a social enterprise.
    Therefore, I have reviewed a new form of social enterprise in the United States, which can substantially and continuously perform the roles and functions requested above. And I looked at what problems under the current legal system would be considered if it were introduced.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이호중, "협동조합 고유의 특성에 근거한 경영전략" 아이쿱협동조합연구소 (8) : 2012

    2 고재종, "한국의 사회적 기업에 관한 개괄적 검토" 법학연구소 38 (38): 49-68, 2014

    3 한상진 ; 황미영, "한국과 영국의 사회적 기업 제도화에 관한 비교 연구 :영국의 공동체 이익회사와 한국의 노동부 인증 사회적 기업을 중심으로" 제3섹터연구소 8 (8): 91-124, 2010

    4 김예은, "중남미 공동이익법제 분석" 한국법제연구원 2021

    5 김화성 ; 주동범, "유럽 및 미국의 사회적 기업 운영 현황 및 교육 분야 적용을 위한 시사점" 한국비교교육학회 24 (24): 57-77, 2014

    6 김신양, "사회적기업의 발전과정 및 전망" 충남연구원 2012

    7 엄민우, "사회적 기업이라고 동정바라지 마라"

    8 심창학, "사회적 기업의 정체성 확인 및 영역 설정: 프랑스 사례를 중심으로" 제3섹터연구소 10 (10): 77-115, 2012

    9 강정혜, "사회적 기업에 대한 법적 고찰" 서울시립대학교 법학연구소 20 (20): 109-143, 2013

    10 장금용, "사회적 기업 창업과 ESG 경영"

    1 이호중, "협동조합 고유의 특성에 근거한 경영전략" 아이쿱협동조합연구소 (8) : 2012

    2 고재종, "한국의 사회적 기업에 관한 개괄적 검토" 법학연구소 38 (38): 49-68, 2014

    3 한상진 ; 황미영, "한국과 영국의 사회적 기업 제도화에 관한 비교 연구 :영국의 공동체 이익회사와 한국의 노동부 인증 사회적 기업을 중심으로" 제3섹터연구소 8 (8): 91-124, 2010

    4 김예은, "중남미 공동이익법제 분석" 한국법제연구원 2021

    5 김화성 ; 주동범, "유럽 및 미국의 사회적 기업 운영 현황 및 교육 분야 적용을 위한 시사점" 한국비교교육학회 24 (24): 57-77, 2014

    6 김신양, "사회적기업의 발전과정 및 전망" 충남연구원 2012

    7 엄민우, "사회적 기업이라고 동정바라지 마라"

    8 심창학, "사회적 기업의 정체성 확인 및 영역 설정: 프랑스 사례를 중심으로" 제3섹터연구소 10 (10): 77-115, 2012

    9 강정혜, "사회적 기업에 대한 법적 고찰" 서울시립대학교 법학연구소 20 (20): 109-143, 2013

    10 장금용, "사회적 기업 창업과 ESG 경영"

    11 김종호, "미국의 사회적 기업에 대한 정책지원과 저영리유한책임회사 제도에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 (65) : 393-433, 2014

    12 손연아, "미국 비콥(B-채게) 인증과 베네핏 코퍼레이션 법제 분석" 한국법제연구원 2021

    13 이남겸 ; 이수욱 ; 이귀영, "독일 사회적기업 특징 고찰과 시사점" 사회혁신기업연구원 7 (7): 23-30, 2022

    14 ミルトン·フリードマン, "資本主義と自由" 日経BP社 2008

    15 内本博行, "社会的企業概念についての一考察―営利・非営利と自助・他助からのアプ ローチ―" 流通経済大学経済学部 52 (52): 2018

    16 内田俊博, "社会的企業と営利企業との協働 : 公共財供給の2 次ジレンマの視点から" (25) : 2014

    17 "注目さ れ始めている新しい組織~ベネフィットコーポレーション~の紹介" NPI

    18 石黒督朗, "欧米日における社会的企業の歴史的展開" 東京経済大学経済学会 (306) : 2020

    19 鈴木由紀子, "ベネフィット・コーポレーションの展開と課題" 日本大学商学部商学研究所 (33) : 2017

    20 조봉현, "[조봉현의 스타트업경제] 새로운 기업 세상을 여는 비콥 운동" 청년창업가협회

    21 Thomson Reuters Foundation, "Which legal structure is right for my soc ial enterprise? A guide to establishing a social enterprise in the United States"

    22 "What is an L3C(Low-Profit Limited Liability Compa ny) : An Entity for Entrepreneurs Who Value Purpose and Profits"

    23 Mulgan, Geoff, "The Process of Social Innovation" Massachusetts I nstitute of Technology Press 1 (1): 2006

    24 Hiller, J. S., "The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibili ty" 2013

    25 TOM MOODY, "THE L3C - FACILITATING SOCIALLY BENEFICIAL INVES TING"

    26 DTI, "Social Enterprise: a strategy for success"

    27 Marthe Nyssens, "Social Enterprise in Europe : Recent Trends and Devel opments" 2008

    28 Sandra Feldman, "Should I form a benefit corporation or a nonprofit? F ive differences to consider"

    29 Elizabeth Schmidt, "New Legal Structure for Social Enterprises : Designe d for One Role but Playing Another" 43 : 2019

    30 Thomas Kelly, "Law and Choice of Equity on the Social Enterprise Fronti er" 84 : 2009

    31 Cody Vitello, "INTRODUCING THE LOW-PROFIT LIMITED LIABILITY C OMPANY(L3C) : THE NEW KID ON THE BLOCK" 24 (24): 2011

    32 William H. Clark, Jr., "How Benefit Corporatio ns Are redefining The Purpose of Business Corporations" 38 (38): 2012

    33 太田崇彦, "ESG 投資・ステークホルダー資本主義を巡る背景・課題・議論(ロシアの ウクライナ侵攻の影響等)- 追い風と向かい風-"

    34 EU, "COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 6 May 2003 concerning the d efinition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises(notified un der document number C(2003) 1422)(Text with EEA relevance)"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼