RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      심포지엄 한국미의 심층 구조 : 한국 전통미학사상의 구조 = The Structure of Korean Traditional Aesthetic Thoughts

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40100355

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Is there Korean aesthetics, indeed? If there is, in what sense does it exist? And what is its content? We have not considered seriously on these questions. We could raise the similar question as following: What makes arts to become worthy of Korean art? It is not easy to explain the basis which makes any work of art as Korean art. If it is Korean art, it is obvious that the style should have a continuity with the Korean artistic tradition historically, and that the maker should be conscious of this continuity above a certain level in his process of production. Aesthetic thought is the manifestation of human spirit, and the history of aesthetics develops connecting with the politics, society, culture and religion which shapes the world view of each period. Korean traditional thoughts are basically Shamanism, Buddhism, Confucianism and Taoism. Accordingly, the contents of Korean traditional aesthetics are divided into Shamanistic, Buddhistic, Confucianistic and Taoistic aesthetics. Nobody doubt on the value and vitality of Korean aesthetics. But it is not suitable to insist that we should find necessarily the uniqueness and exclusiveness of Korean elements. Such insistence comes near bring into being the narrow-minded nationalism and distorts our view of world. It is important for us to understand and evaluate the aesthetic achievements of our ancestor in the historical context. Moreover, we should recognize and elucidate that our aesthetic tradition is closely connected with the generality and universality of aesthetics. Korean aesthetics is necessarily defined and influenced by its cultural context, so we should inspire the vividness into it by aiming at the higher universal validity. We could indicate a few of traits of Korean traditional aesthetics as follows. Firstly, it lays stress on the inner beauty of mind rather than sensual beauty of appearance. Secondly, Korean aesthetic consciousness tend toward the beauty of simplicity, plainness and lightness, different from gorgeousness, magnificence and extravagance. Thirdly, the value of beauty and art is considered as its practical role for the contribution in human life, not for self-satisfaction of the artist or appreciator.
      번역하기

      Is there Korean aesthetics, indeed? If there is, in what sense does it exist? And what is its content? We have not considered seriously on these questions. We could raise the similar question as following: What makes arts to become worthy of Korean ar...

      Is there Korean aesthetics, indeed? If there is, in what sense does it exist? And what is its content? We have not considered seriously on these questions. We could raise the similar question as following: What makes arts to become worthy of Korean art? It is not easy to explain the basis which makes any work of art as Korean art. If it is Korean art, it is obvious that the style should have a continuity with the Korean artistic tradition historically, and that the maker should be conscious of this continuity above a certain level in his process of production. Aesthetic thought is the manifestation of human spirit, and the history of aesthetics develops connecting with the politics, society, culture and religion which shapes the world view of each period. Korean traditional thoughts are basically Shamanism, Buddhism, Confucianism and Taoism. Accordingly, the contents of Korean traditional aesthetics are divided into Shamanistic, Buddhistic, Confucianistic and Taoistic aesthetics. Nobody doubt on the value and vitality of Korean aesthetics. But it is not suitable to insist that we should find necessarily the uniqueness and exclusiveness of Korean elements. Such insistence comes near bring into being the narrow-minded nationalism and distorts our view of world. It is important for us to understand and evaluate the aesthetic achievements of our ancestor in the historical context. Moreover, we should recognize and elucidate that our aesthetic tradition is closely connected with the generality and universality of aesthetics. Korean aesthetics is necessarily defined and influenced by its cultural context, so we should inspire the vividness into it by aiming at the higher universal validity. We could indicate a few of traits of Korean traditional aesthetics as follows. Firstly, it lays stress on the inner beauty of mind rather than sensual beauty of appearance. Secondly, Korean aesthetic consciousness tend toward the beauty of simplicity, plainness and lightness, different from gorgeousness, magnificence and extravagance. Thirdly, the value of beauty and art is considered as its practical role for the contribution in human life, not for self-satisfaction of the artist or appreciator.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.46
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.48 0.5 1.082 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼