RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      알레르기성 비염 환자에서의 비강유발검사 후 비즙내 알부민을 이용한 비즙 채취 방법의 비교 = Comparison of Collecting Methods of Nasal Fluids Using Albumin after Nasal Provocation in Allergic Patients

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101609961

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background and Objectives Although different methods of collecting nasal fluid exist and can influence the result of the study, there have not been any studies made yet to compare the different methods. The authors aimed to evaluate the usefulness of these methods by comparing the albumin concentration of nasal fluid after nasal provocation in patients with allergic rhinitis.
      Subjects and Method In 22 patients with allergic rhinitis, we measured the change of nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea after nasal provocation using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). In Group A (n=10), the nasal lavage and direct suction method were used and in Group B (n=12), nasal lavage and filter paper method were used. Nasal fluids were obtained before, 20 min after and 8 hours after provocation. The concentration of albumin was calculated using rate nephelometry.
      Results Patientsʼ nasal symptoms were aggravated in early allergic reaction but subsided in late reaction. There was meaningful increase of albumin concentration with the use of direct suction and filter paper methods. In contrast, there was no significant increase of concentration with the use of lavage method.
      Conclusion The filter paper method is superior in the quantitative analysis of mediators in nasal fluid after nasal provocation in allergic patients. The lavage method, however, is considered inappropriate because of its dilution effect.
      Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2010;53:615-9
      번역하기

      Background and Objectives Although different methods of collecting nasal fluid exist and can influence the result of the study, there have not been any studies made yet to compare the different methods. The authors aimed to evaluate the usefulness of ...

      Background and Objectives Although different methods of collecting nasal fluid exist and can influence the result of the study, there have not been any studies made yet to compare the different methods. The authors aimed to evaluate the usefulness of these methods by comparing the albumin concentration of nasal fluid after nasal provocation in patients with allergic rhinitis.
      Subjects and Method In 22 patients with allergic rhinitis, we measured the change of nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea after nasal provocation using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). In Group A (n=10), the nasal lavage and direct suction method were used and in Group B (n=12), nasal lavage and filter paper method were used. Nasal fluids were obtained before, 20 min after and 8 hours after provocation. The concentration of albumin was calculated using rate nephelometry.
      Results Patientsʼ nasal symptoms were aggravated in early allergic reaction but subsided in late reaction. There was meaningful increase of albumin concentration with the use of direct suction and filter paper methods. In contrast, there was no significant increase of concentration with the use of lavage method.
      Conclusion The filter paper method is superior in the quantitative analysis of mediators in nasal fluid after nasal provocation in allergic patients. The lavage method, however, is considered inappropriate because of its dilution effect.
      Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2010;53:615-9

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Yamazaki M, "Use of a rapid detection assay for influenza virus, on nasal aspirate specimens" 73 : 1064-1068, 1999

      2 Pupek M, "Time-dependent observations of secretion marker levels in nasal secretion after histamine and methacholine provocations" 51 (51): 259-265, 2003

      3 Hilding AC, "Simple method for collecting near-normal human nasal secretion" 81 (81): 422-423, 1972

      4 Wang DY, "Pathogenic mechanisms underlying the clinical symptoms of allergic rhinitis" 14 (14): 325-333, 2000

      5 Klimek L, "Norm values for eosinophil cationic protein in nasal secretions: influence of specimen collection" 29 (29): 367-374, 1999

      6 Biewenga J, "Nasal secretions from patients with polyps and healthy individuals, collected with a new aspiration system: evaluation of total protein and immunoglobulin concentrations" 28 (28): 260-266, 1991

      7 Ingels K, "Nasal biopsy is superior to nasal smear for finding eosinophils in nonallergic rhinitis" 52 (52): 338-341, 1997

      8 Gevaert P, "Nasal IL-5 levels determine the response to anti-IL-5 treatment in patients with nasal polyps" 118 (118): 1133-1141, 2006

      9 Adkinson NF Jr, "Middleton’s allergy: principles and practice. 7th ed" Mosby 1281-1282, 2009

      10 Klimek L, "Methods for monitoring of therapeutic efficacy in immunotherapy of allergic rhinitis" 149 (149): 394-402, 1999

      1 Yamazaki M, "Use of a rapid detection assay for influenza virus, on nasal aspirate specimens" 73 : 1064-1068, 1999

      2 Pupek M, "Time-dependent observations of secretion marker levels in nasal secretion after histamine and methacholine provocations" 51 (51): 259-265, 2003

      3 Hilding AC, "Simple method for collecting near-normal human nasal secretion" 81 (81): 422-423, 1972

      4 Wang DY, "Pathogenic mechanisms underlying the clinical symptoms of allergic rhinitis" 14 (14): 325-333, 2000

      5 Klimek L, "Norm values for eosinophil cationic protein in nasal secretions: influence of specimen collection" 29 (29): 367-374, 1999

      6 Biewenga J, "Nasal secretions from patients with polyps and healthy individuals, collected with a new aspiration system: evaluation of total protein and immunoglobulin concentrations" 28 (28): 260-266, 1991

      7 Ingels K, "Nasal biopsy is superior to nasal smear for finding eosinophils in nonallergic rhinitis" 52 (52): 338-341, 1997

      8 Gevaert P, "Nasal IL-5 levels determine the response to anti-IL-5 treatment in patients with nasal polyps" 118 (118): 1133-1141, 2006

      9 Adkinson NF Jr, "Middleton’s allergy: principles and practice. 7th ed" Mosby 1281-1282, 2009

      10 Klimek L, "Methods for monitoring of therapeutic efficacy in immunotherapy of allergic rhinitis" 149 (149): 394-402, 1999

      11 Kim SS, "Levels of intracellular protein and messenger RNA of mucin and lysozyme in normal human nasal and polyp epithelium" 110 : 276-280, 2000

      12 Niehaus MD, "Lactoferrin and eosinophilic cationic protein in nasal secretions of patients with experimental rhinovirus colds, natural colds, and presumed acute community-acquired bacterial sinusitis" 38 (38): 3100-3102, 2000

      13 Besançon-Watelet C, "Eosinophilia and cell activation mediators in nasal secretions" 112 (112): 43-46, 2002

      14 Maremmani C, "Electrophoretic pattern of physiological human nasal secretions" 34 (34): 147-150, 1996

      15 Watelet JB, "Collection of nasal secretions for immunological analysis" 261 (261): 242-246, 2004

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼