RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    2007년 태국헌법개정과 헌법재판 = Thai Constitutional Revision in 2007 and Constitutional Court

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106159744

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Thai Constitution of 1997 was the fruit of the Thai people's deep enthusiasm for democracy. The principal goals of this Constitution were to reform the nation's political system to encourage and promote greater participation of Thai citizens in political process, to bring honesty, transparency, accountability and legitimacy into the political system, and to ensure greater political stability. The Constitutional Court, newly introduced in the Thai political system by the Constitution of 1997, was expected to safeguard these goals and therefor was given several powers.
    But, because the Constitution of 1997 ended in failure, it was suspended by the military Coup d'Etat in September 2006. Even though the Constitutional Court contributed partially to the political stability through the cases on counter corruption dispute and political parties, it could not answer essentially to the basic and old problem of the Thai political system: patronage. Three principal cases before and behind the military Coup d'Etat in September 2006 (cases of 2006.2.16, 2006.5.8 and 2007.5.30) showed it well.
    On the one hand the new Thai Constitution is considered as a step back for democracy, and on the other hand it is being expected to answer to political instability. Constitution drafting of 2007 which was led by the military and some bureaucrats was adapted ultimately by Thai people's referendum. The referendum legitimating the new Constitution was the first time in the history of the Thai constitutional amendments.
    The Parliamentary system was weakened by the Constitution of 2007 - A prime minister having a two-term limit, the half of senators being selected by the Senators Selection Committee which is composed of five members (the President of the Constitutional Court, a judge of the Supreme Court of Justice, etc.,).
    The direct democracy was enhanced by the constitutional revision. People have a right to submit a petition to the President of the National Assembly to consider a bill, the right to lodge with the President of the Senate a complaint in order to request the Senate to pass a resolution removing from office the persons like as Prime Minister, Minister, member of the House of Representatives, senators, etc, and the right to a referendum.
    The function of the Constitutional Court was reduced, cutting down the number of judges from 15 to 9. It had to transfer the function of counter corruption dispute to the Supreme Court of Justice. But, it also added a new function, concerning that a person whose rights or liberties recognized by the Constitution are violated has the right to file a motion to the Constitutional Court for a decision that a provision of law is contrary to or inconsistent with the Constitution. This arrangement could give a chance to the Court to focus on its own functions, for example, the control of the constitutionality of a law, etc.,
    For the time being, the new Constitution could contribute to keeping the balance between the political powers in reality. And, it is expected that the democratization in Thailand, based on the experiences under the Constitution of 1997, will continue on.
    번역하기

    The Thai Constitution of 1997 was the fruit of the Thai people's deep enthusiasm for democracy. The principal goals of this Constitution were to reform the nation's political system to encourage and promote greater participation of Thai citizens in po...

    The Thai Constitution of 1997 was the fruit of the Thai people's deep enthusiasm for democracy. The principal goals of this Constitution were to reform the nation's political system to encourage and promote greater participation of Thai citizens in political process, to bring honesty, transparency, accountability and legitimacy into the political system, and to ensure greater political stability. The Constitutional Court, newly introduced in the Thai political system by the Constitution of 1997, was expected to safeguard these goals and therefor was given several powers.
    But, because the Constitution of 1997 ended in failure, it was suspended by the military Coup d'Etat in September 2006. Even though the Constitutional Court contributed partially to the political stability through the cases on counter corruption dispute and political parties, it could not answer essentially to the basic and old problem of the Thai political system: patronage. Three principal cases before and behind the military Coup d'Etat in September 2006 (cases of 2006.2.16, 2006.5.8 and 2007.5.30) showed it well.
    On the one hand the new Thai Constitution is considered as a step back for democracy, and on the other hand it is being expected to answer to political instability. Constitution drafting of 2007 which was led by the military and some bureaucrats was adapted ultimately by Thai people's referendum. The referendum legitimating the new Constitution was the first time in the history of the Thai constitutional amendments.
    The Parliamentary system was weakened by the Constitution of 2007 - A prime minister having a two-term limit, the half of senators being selected by the Senators Selection Committee which is composed of five members (the President of the Constitutional Court, a judge of the Supreme Court of Justice, etc.,).
    The direct democracy was enhanced by the constitutional revision. People have a right to submit a petition to the President of the National Assembly to consider a bill, the right to lodge with the President of the Senate a complaint in order to request the Senate to pass a resolution removing from office the persons like as Prime Minister, Minister, member of the House of Representatives, senators, etc, and the right to a referendum.
    The function of the Constitutional Court was reduced, cutting down the number of judges from 15 to 9. It had to transfer the function of counter corruption dispute to the Supreme Court of Justice. But, it also added a new function, concerning that a person whose rights or liberties recognized by the Constitution are violated has the right to file a motion to the Constitutional Court for a decision that a provision of law is contrary to or inconsistent with the Constitution. This arrangement could give a chance to the Court to focus on its own functions, for example, the control of the constitutionality of a law, etc.,
    For the time being, the new Constitution could contribute to keeping the balance between the political powers in reality. And, it is expected that the democratization in Thailand, based on the experiences under the Constitution of 1997, will continue on.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 변해철, "태국의 헌법재판제도와 헌법현실 -한국과의 비교 고찰-" 법학연구소 (21) : 1-22, 2006

    2 변해철, "태국의 민주화와 1997년 헌법개정" 한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 18 : 1-25, 2005

    3 "www.csmonitor.com/2007/0427/p06s01-woap.html"

    4 "www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/05/08/thailand.ruling/index.html"

    5 "www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/IH18Ae01.html"

    6 "timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Reject_Thai_constitution_urges_Thaksin"

    7 "theage.com.au/news/world/.../2006/02/16/1140064203382.html"

    8 "nytimes.com/2007/08/20/world/asia/20thai.html"

    9 "english.people.com.cn/200705/31/eng20070531_379528.html"

    10 The Constitutional Court of Thailand, "The Constitutional Court Rulings 2004 (Bankok: P.Press Co., 2005)"

    1 변해철, "태국의 헌법재판제도와 헌법현실 -한국과의 비교 고찰-" 법학연구소 (21) : 1-22, 2006

    2 변해철, "태국의 민주화와 1997년 헌법개정" 한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 18 : 1-25, 2005

    3 "www.csmonitor.com/2007/0427/p06s01-woap.html"

    4 "www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/05/08/thailand.ruling/index.html"

    5 "www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/IH18Ae01.html"

    6 "timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Reject_Thai_constitution_urges_Thaksin"

    7 "theage.com.au/news/world/.../2006/02/16/1140064203382.html"

    8 "nytimes.com/2007/08/20/world/asia/20thai.html"

    9 "english.people.com.cn/200705/31/eng20070531_379528.html"

    10 The Constitutional Court of Thailand, "The Constitutional Court Rulings 2004 (Bankok: P.Press Co., 2005)"

    11 The Constitutional Court of Thailand, "The Constitutional Court Rulings 2003 (Bankok: P.Press Co., 2004)"

    12 Frank Munger, "Constitutional Reform, Legal Consciousness, and Citizen Participation in Thailand" 11 (11): 2008

    13 이병도, "2),pp.45-79" 12 (12): 45-79, 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-12-23 학회명변경 영문명 : Law Research Institute, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies -> The HUFS Law Research Institute KCI등재
    2014-12-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> HUFS Law Review KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.97 0.97 0.75
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.72 0.69 0.856 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼