RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    AI 챗봇 사용 목적에 따른 복구 전략의 신뢰도 차이‑ 도구적 목적과 정서적 목적을 중심으로 = Differences in Trust in Repair Strategies According to the Purpose of AI Chatbot Use - Focusing on Utilitarian and Emotional Purposes

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110379663

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Background: Large Language Model(LLM)-based AI chatbots are used in a wide range of situations. However, inaccurate or contextually inappropriate esponses can undermine user trust. In particular, AI chatbots are used not only for utilitarian purposes, such as information seeking and task completion, but also for emotional purposes, such as discussing personal concerns and seeking emotional support. As a result, the type of response users expect in error situations may differ depending on the purpose of use. Accordingly, this study aimed to classify chatbot use into utilitarian and emotional purposes and to explore repair strategies that enhance user trust for each purpose.
    Methods: This study first reviewed the literature on the usage purposes of AI chatbots and their repair strategies. Next, scenario-based online surveys were developed for utilitarian and emotional purposes, and items for measuring trust were collected from prior studies. Finally, an online survey was conducted to measure users' trust in repair strategies across each purpose, and the results were compared and analyzed.
    Results: The findings showed that, for utilitarian purposes, solve and information strategies that provide users with concrete guidance on what to do next received higher trust. For emotional purposes, social and disclosure strategies that respond in a friendly and honest manner received higher trust. In addition, repair strategies that received high trust for one purpose showed relatively lower trust for the other, confirming that effective repair strategies may differ depending on the purpose of use.
    Conclusion: The findings suggest that chatbot repair strategies do not function in the same way across all situations and that the most effective strategy varies depending on the purpose of use. For utilitarian purposes, strategies that support problem solving and guide users’ next actions generated higher trust, whereas for emotional purposes, strategies that express friendliness and honesty generated higher trust. This implies that chatbot error responses should not be designed in a one-size-fits-all manner, but rather should be tailored to the purpose of use and the role users expect the chatbot to play.
    번역하기

    Background: Large Language Model(LLM)-based AI chatbots are used in a wide range of situations. However, inaccurate or contextually inappropriate esponses can undermine user trust. In particular, AI chatbots are used not only for utilitarian purposes,...

    Background: Large Language Model(LLM)-based AI chatbots are used in a wide range of situations. However, inaccurate or contextually inappropriate esponses can undermine user trust. In particular, AI chatbots are used not only for utilitarian purposes, such as information seeking and task completion, but also for emotional purposes, such as discussing personal concerns and seeking emotional support. As a result, the type of response users expect in error situations may differ depending on the purpose of use. Accordingly, this study aimed to classify chatbot use into utilitarian and emotional purposes and to explore repair strategies that enhance user trust for each purpose.
    Methods: This study first reviewed the literature on the usage purposes of AI chatbots and their repair strategies. Next, scenario-based online surveys were developed for utilitarian and emotional purposes, and items for measuring trust were collected from prior studies. Finally, an online survey was conducted to measure users' trust in repair strategies across each purpose, and the results were compared and analyzed.
    Results: The findings showed that, for utilitarian purposes, solve and information strategies that provide users with concrete guidance on what to do next received higher trust. For emotional purposes, social and disclosure strategies that respond in a friendly and honest manner received higher trust. In addition, repair strategies that received high trust for one purpose showed relatively lower trust for the other, confirming that effective repair strategies may differ depending on the purpose of use.
    Conclusion: The findings suggest that chatbot repair strategies do not function in the same way across all situations and that the most effective strategy varies depending on the purpose of use. For utilitarian purposes, strategies that support problem solving and guide users’ next actions generated higher trust, whereas for emotional purposes, strategies that express friendliness and honesty generated higher trust. This implies that chatbot error responses should not be designed in a one-size-fits-all manner, but rather should be tailored to the purpose of use and the role users expect the chatbot to play.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼