RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      디지털 치료기술 산업 육성에 따른 투자와 경제적 파급효과 = Investment and Economic Ripple Effects from Fostering the Digital Treatment Technology Industry

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107195228

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The digital treatment technology industry is one of the core fostering industries of the Moon Jae-in government along with the global trend. The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the investment and economic ripple effect on the related industries. To this end, we used the industry-related table, which is the actual measurement data for 2015 that the Bank of Korea actually measured and released every 5 years in 2019. The digital treatment technology industry was not clearly classified within Korea’s industrial classification system, so the contents of the industry-related survey were analyzed, and the digital treatment technology industry was reclassified and then analyzed. As a result of the analysis, it was analyzed that the production induction effect of the digital treatment technology-related industry in 2015 was 1.770, the value-added induction effect was 0.875, and the employment induction effect was 19.128, which was higher than that of other industries in Korea. As a result of the analysis of the economic ripple effect (scenario 1), the production inducing effect was about 370 billion won, the added value inducing effect was about 185 billion won, and the employment inducing effect was 4,044 people. The results of this study are expected to play a large role in economic revitalization as the effect of inducing production, increasing employment, and creating added value through fostering the digital treatment technology industry is expected to play a large role in activating the economy. It is expected to play a large role in providing central medical services. Therefore, it is expected that policy support for revitalizing the digital treatment technology industry through active investment support and tax benefits from the government to foster the digital treatment technology industry is necessary.
      번역하기

      The digital treatment technology industry is one of the core fostering industries of the Moon Jae-in government along with the global trend. The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the investment and economic ripple effect on the related i...

      The digital treatment technology industry is one of the core fostering industries of the Moon Jae-in government along with the global trend. The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the investment and economic ripple effect on the related industries. To this end, we used the industry-related table, which is the actual measurement data for 2015 that the Bank of Korea actually measured and released every 5 years in 2019. The digital treatment technology industry was not clearly classified within Korea’s industrial classification system, so the contents of the industry-related survey were analyzed, and the digital treatment technology industry was reclassified and then analyzed. As a result of the analysis, it was analyzed that the production induction effect of the digital treatment technology-related industry in 2015 was 1.770, the value-added induction effect was 0.875, and the employment induction effect was 19.128, which was higher than that of other industries in Korea. As a result of the analysis of the economic ripple effect (scenario 1), the production inducing effect was about 370 billion won, the added value inducing effect was about 185 billion won, and the employment inducing effect was 4,044 people. The results of this study are expected to play a large role in economic revitalization as the effect of inducing production, increasing employment, and creating added value through fostering the digital treatment technology industry is expected to play a large role in activating the economy. It is expected to play a large role in providing central medical services. Therefore, it is expected that policy support for revitalizing the digital treatment technology industry through active investment support and tax benefits from the government to foster the digital treatment technology industry is necessary.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Leontief WW, "Quantitative input-output relations in the economic system of the United States" 18 : 105-125, 1936

      2 Korea Health Promotion Institute, "Policy trend analysis for health care service R&D performance evaluation system" Korea Health Promotion Institute 2019

      3 Buttorff C, "Multiple chronic conditions in the United States" RAND 2017

      4 FCA Venture Partners, "Investing in entrepreneurs who improve healthcare : investment area of interest : digital therapeutics"

      5 Jung YH, "Industry-related analysis of the pharmaceutical industry : comparison between Korea and Japan" 19 (19): 99-123, 2001

      6 National Health Insurance Service, "How to use health insurance big data"

      7 National IT Industry Promotion Agency, "Global ICT issue health care industry trend" National IT Industry Promotion Agency 2019

      8 Lund S, "Game changers : five opportunities for US growth and renewal" McKinsey Global Institute 2013

      9 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, "Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017" Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation 2018

      10 Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Domestic bio industry survey" Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy 2019

      1 Leontief WW, "Quantitative input-output relations in the economic system of the United States" 18 : 105-125, 1936

      2 Korea Health Promotion Institute, "Policy trend analysis for health care service R&D performance evaluation system" Korea Health Promotion Institute 2019

      3 Buttorff C, "Multiple chronic conditions in the United States" RAND 2017

      4 FCA Venture Partners, "Investing in entrepreneurs who improve healthcare : investment area of interest : digital therapeutics"

      5 Jung YH, "Industry-related analysis of the pharmaceutical industry : comparison between Korea and Japan" 19 (19): 99-123, 2001

      6 National Health Insurance Service, "How to use health insurance big data"

      7 National IT Industry Promotion Agency, "Global ICT issue health care industry trend" National IT Industry Promotion Agency 2019

      8 Lund S, "Game changers : five opportunities for US growth and renewal" McKinsey Global Institute 2013

      9 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, "Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017" Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation 2018

      10 Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Domestic bio industry survey" Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy 2019

      11 Kim SB, "Digital-healthcare convergence industry trend" Korea Health Industry Development Institute 2015

      12 Joint Ministry, "Current status and plans for innovation growth engines" Joint Ministry 2018

      13 Korea Institute for Advancement of Industrial Technology, "Bio health industry trend and technology strategy" Korea Institute for Advancement of Industrial Technology 2017

      14 Joint Ministry, "Bio health industry innovation strategy" Joint Ministry 2019

      15 National Health Insurance Service, "Analysis of socioeconomic cost of major diseases for setting health security policy priorities" National Health Insurance Service 2014

      16 The Bank of Korea, "An analysis of industry association 49"

      17 Korea Insurance Research Institute, "4th Industrial revolution and vitalization of healthcare industry" Korea Insurance Research Institute 2017

      18 Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "2019 Chronic disease status and issues" Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2017

      19 Jain R, "2017 Year end funding report : the end of the beginning of digital health" Rock Health 2017

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-03-11 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society Of Health Policy And Administration -> Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management KCI등재
      2013-03-11 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Health Policy and Administration -> Health Policy and Mangemnet KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.78 0.78 0.8
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.81 0.78 1.372 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼