問題解決을 중심으로 한 中學校 1學年 數學敎科書 國際比較에 대한 小考

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This thesis is a comparative analysis of five different Korean seventh grade methmatics text-books which have been revised under the Fifth Curriculum Guidelines, and Japanese and American seventh grade Mathematical books.
The comparative analysis focuses on problem solving, especially with respect to problem types. The problem types were categonized into preparatory, computing, word and puzzle problems, so as to show how much the emphasis of the Curriculum Guidelines were effectively reflected in the five Korean textbooks.
The author found that the contents, arrangements and the manner in which each chapters were presented were almost identical in Korean and Japanese textbooks. The American textbooks focuses on basic numerical operations and each chapter includes a section devoted to computers and problem solving strategies.
The textbooks of all three countries contained computing problems out of the four types described above, the most. Also, with respect to word problems, all of them contained more routine than non-routine problems. Only Korean and American textbooks contained puzzle problems.
Considering the evidence shown above, it can be concluded that there are little difference in the types it problems the textbooks of different countries contain. However, in American textbooks, problem solving processes and strategies enhancing problem solving abilities, were directly reflected in the curriculum where Japanese textbooks proved to be inadequate in this respect. Likewise, although the Korean Fifth Curriculum Guidelines also emphasizes enhancing problem solving alilities, this was not sufficiently reflected in the revised textbooks.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• 영문요지
• I. 서론 = 1
• 1. 연구의 동기와 목적 = 1
• 2. 연구의 대상 = 4
• 3. 연구방법 = 5
• 4. 연구의 제한점 = 5
• II. 이론적 배경 = 6
• 1. 교과서 분석에 관한 문헌연구 = 6
• 2. 문제해결에 관한 문헌연구 = 8
• 3. 본 연구에서 분류한 문제유형과 그 정의 = 12
• II. 이론적 배경 = 6
• 1. 교과서 분석에 관한 문헌연구 = 6
• 2. 문제해결에 관한 문헌연구 = 8
• 3. 본 연구에서 분류한 문제유형과 그 정의 = 12
• III. 교과서 구성비교 = 13
• 1. 교과서 집필 및 편찬의 비교 = 13
• 2. 교과서 내용구성의 비교 = 15
• 1) 단원의 배열비교 = 15
• 2) 단원의 구성양식비교 = 17
• 3) 단원의 장·절의 비교 = 20
• 4) 양적 구성비교 = 42
• IV. 교과서 내용비교 = 45
• 1. 문제의 배정비교 = 45
• 2. 문제의 유형비교 = 49
• 1) 선행학습문제
• 2) 계산문제
• 3) 문장제 문제
• 4) Puzzle 문제
• 3. 문장제 문제의 비교 = 59
• 1) 정형문제와 비정형문제 = 64
• 4. 미국교과서문제의 유형비교 = 67
• V. 결론 = 67
• 참고문헌 = 70