RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Democratization and Its Implications for Cooperation in the Pacific Region : The Case of South Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75029616

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As recent political development in Pacific nations shows clearly, democratization is a very complex process, which - at least in the short term - may not always produce a positive impact on regional cooperation. Each democratizing or newly democratized country is facing particular problems arising from various factors. Democratization could increase the level of political instability by creating new political cleavages and increasing political polarization. It could also result in changes in foreign policies, sometimes in a direction that poses obstacles to effective cooperation among Pacific countries
    The case of South Korea illustrates well the problems and challenges of democratic development and its implications for cooperation in the Pacific community. While there is little doubt that democracy in Korea has become "the only game in town," Korean politics has become deeply polarized since President Rho took office in 2003. Political polarization is related to the expansion of the ideological spectrum to the extent that is unforseen in the history of Korea since the end of the Korean War. During the Rho administration, the alliance with the U.S. has been somewhat weakened, and some Korean people even have the view that Korea should strengthen its cooperation with China while trying to reduce the U.S. influence on Korea. This kind of view has a negative impact on the cooperation among Pacific democracies.
    The Korean case suggests that for more effective cooperation, Pacific democracies need to have a deeper understanding of the rapidly changing political realities of other aspiring or new democracies in the region. And new and more diversified networks of communication and cooperation need to be constructed reflecting wider political spectrum of the countries.
    번역하기

    As recent political development in Pacific nations shows clearly, democratization is a very complex process, which - at least in the short term - may not always produce a positive impact on regional cooperation. Each democratizing or newly democratize...

    As recent political development in Pacific nations shows clearly, democratization is a very complex process, which - at least in the short term - may not always produce a positive impact on regional cooperation. Each democratizing or newly democratized country is facing particular problems arising from various factors. Democratization could increase the level of political instability by creating new political cleavages and increasing political polarization. It could also result in changes in foreign policies, sometimes in a direction that poses obstacles to effective cooperation among Pacific countries
    The case of South Korea illustrates well the problems and challenges of democratic development and its implications for cooperation in the Pacific community. While there is little doubt that democracy in Korea has become "the only game in town," Korean politics has become deeply polarized since President Rho took office in 2003. Political polarization is related to the expansion of the ideological spectrum to the extent that is unforseen in the history of Korea since the end of the Korean War. During the Rho administration, the alliance with the U.S. has been somewhat weakened, and some Korean people even have the view that Korea should strengthen its cooperation with China while trying to reduce the U.S. influence on Korea. This kind of view has a negative impact on the cooperation among Pacific democracies.
    The Korean case suggests that for more effective cooperation, Pacific democracies need to have a deeper understanding of the rapidly changing political realities of other aspiring or new democracies in the region. And new and more diversified networks of communication and cooperation need to be constructed reflecting wider political spectrum of the countries.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ.Introduction = 143
    • Ⅱ.Democratic Development in Korea and Increasing Political Confrontation and Polarization = 145
    • Ⅲ.The Impact on Foreign Policies and Implications for Cooperation in the Pacific Region = 149
    • Ⅳ.Implications for Cooperation between Taiwan and Korea = 151
    • Ⅰ.Introduction = 143
    • Ⅱ.Democratic Development in Korea and Increasing Political Confrontation and Polarization = 145
    • Ⅲ.The Impact on Foreign Policies and Implications for Cooperation in the Pacific Region = 149
    • Ⅳ.Implications for Cooperation between Taiwan and Korea = 151
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼