RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    자아탄력성, 긍정적 정서 및 사회적지지와 청소년의 가정생활적응 및 학교생활적응과의 관계 = (The) Relationships between Self-Resilience, Positive Emotion, Social Support and Adolescents' Adjustment in Family Life·School Life

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T7878465

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the study was to specify the effects of gender, grade and family´s socioeconomic status to adolescents´s adjustment in family life and school life, to explore the influences of self-resilience, positive emotion and social supports on adolescents´ adjustment in family life and school life, and to find the differences in level of self-resilience, positive emotion and social supports according to the adjustment type.
    The data were collected from 638 middle school students in pusan through the questionnaire method, were analyzed by the SAS program.
    The major findings were as follows;
    1. The score of family life adjustment was higher than the score of school life adjustment. The adolescents´ adjustment in family life and school life were differed by grade. The higher family´s socioeconomic status adolescents adjusted better in family life.
    2. In general, adjustment in family life was affected by mother´s support, father´s supports, self-resilience, positive emotion, peer´s support. The best effective factor of adjustment in family life was social supports from mother. Factors that affected adjustment in family life were different depending on sex, grade, and family´s socioeconomic status. The boy´s adjustment in family life was affected by teacher´s supports, but girl´s adjustment in family life was not. The girl´s adjustment in family life was affected by peer´s supports. The first grader was influenced by teacher´s supports for their adjustment in family life. The adjustment in family life of the low family´s socioeconomic status adolescents was affected by peer´s supports.
    3. In general, the adjustment in school life was increased by teacher´s supports, self-resilience, mother´s support, and positive emotion. The best effective factor of adjustment in school life was different depending on their sex, grade and family´s socioeconomic status. The girl´s adjustment in school life was influenced by mother´s supports and positive emotion. The second grader´s adjustment in school life was influenced by mother´s supports, and the third grader´s adjustment in school life was influenced by peer´s supports. The middle family´s socioeconomic status adolescents was affected by peer´s supports.
    4. Self-resilience, positive emotion and social supports were different according to the adjustment type. Adjusted type has highest self-resilience, positive emotion and social supports and Maladjusted type has lowest self-resilience, positive emotion and social supports from teacher and peer were lower than those of adjusted type. School adjusted type´s self-resilience, positive emotion and social supports were lower than those of adjusted type.
    번역하기

    The purpose of the study was to specify the effects of gender, grade and family´s socioeconomic status to adolescents´s adjustment in family life and school life, to explore the influences of self-resilience, positive emotion and social supports on ...

    The purpose of the study was to specify the effects of gender, grade and family´s socioeconomic status to adolescents´s adjustment in family life and school life, to explore the influences of self-resilience, positive emotion and social supports on adolescents´ adjustment in family life and school life, and to find the differences in level of self-resilience, positive emotion and social supports according to the adjustment type.
    The data were collected from 638 middle school students in pusan through the questionnaire method, were analyzed by the SAS program.
    The major findings were as follows;
    1. The score of family life adjustment was higher than the score of school life adjustment. The adolescents´ adjustment in family life and school life were differed by grade. The higher family´s socioeconomic status adolescents adjusted better in family life.
    2. In general, adjustment in family life was affected by mother´s support, father´s supports, self-resilience, positive emotion, peer´s support. The best effective factor of adjustment in family life was social supports from mother. Factors that affected adjustment in family life were different depending on sex, grade, and family´s socioeconomic status. The boy´s adjustment in family life was affected by teacher´s supports, but girl´s adjustment in family life was not. The girl´s adjustment in family life was affected by peer´s supports. The first grader was influenced by teacher´s supports for their adjustment in family life. The adjustment in family life of the low family´s socioeconomic status adolescents was affected by peer´s supports.
    3. In general, the adjustment in school life was increased by teacher´s supports, self-resilience, mother´s support, and positive emotion. The best effective factor of adjustment in school life was different depending on their sex, grade and family´s socioeconomic status. The girl´s adjustment in school life was influenced by mother´s supports and positive emotion. The second grader´s adjustment in school life was influenced by mother´s supports, and the third grader´s adjustment in school life was influenced by peer´s supports. The middle family´s socioeconomic status adolescents was affected by peer´s supports.
    4. Self-resilience, positive emotion and social supports were different according to the adjustment type. Adjusted type has highest self-resilience, positive emotion and social supports and Maladjusted type has lowest self-resilience, positive emotion and social supports from teacher and peer were lower than those of adjusted type. School adjusted type´s self-resilience, positive emotion and social supports were lower than those of adjusted type.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
    • 2. 연구문제 = 5
    • 3. 용어의 정의 = 6
    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
    • 2. 연구문제 = 5
    • 3. 용어의 정의 = 6
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 8
    • 1. 청소년의 가정생활적응과 학교생활적응 = 8
    • 2. 자아탄력성 및 정서성과 청소년의 생활적응 = 12
    • (1) 자아탄력성과 청소년의 가정생활적응 및 학교생활적응 = 12
    • (2) 정서성과 청소년의 가정생활적응과 학교생활적응 = 13
    • 3. 사회적 지지와 청소년의 생활적응 = 15
    • (1) 사회적 지지와 청소년의 가정생활적응 및 학교생활적응 = 15
    • 4. 청소년의 자아탄력성, 긍정적 정서, 사회적 지지 및 생활적응과 관련변수 = 19
    • (1) 성별 = 19
    • (2) 학년 = 20
    • (3) 사회경제적 지위 = 20
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 = 22
    • 1. 연구 대상 = 22
    • 2. 측정 도구 = 22
    • 3. 자료수집 절차 = 28
    • 4. 자료분석 = 29
    • Ⅳ. 연구결과 및 해석 = 30
    • 1. 청소년의 가정생활적응 및 학교생활적응의 실태 = 30
    • 2. 자아탄성력, 긍정적 정서 및 사회적 지지와 청소년의 가정생활적응 및 학교생활적응간의 관련성 = 33
    • (1) 연구 변인들간의 상관관계 = 33
    • (2) 청소년의 생활적응에 미치는 자아탄력성, 긍정적 정서 및 사회적 지지의 영향 = 34
    • (3) 성별에 따른 청소년의 생활적응에 미치는 자아탄성력, 긍정적 정서 및 사회적 지지의 영향 = 37
    • (4) 학년에 따른 청소년의 생활적응에 미치는 자아탄성력, 긍정적 정서 및 사회적 지지의 영향 = 39
    • (5) 사회경제적 지위에 따른 청소년의 생활적응에 미치는 자아탄력성, 긍정적 정서 및 사회적 지지의 영향 = 42
    • 3. 청소년의 가정 및 학교생활적응 유형에 따른 자아탄력성, 긍정적 정서 및 사회적 지지의 특성 = 46
    • (1) 청소년의 가정 및 학교생활적응 유형 = 46
    • (2) 청소년의 가정 및 학교생활적응 유형에 따른 자아탄력성, 긍정적 정서 및 사회적 지지의 차이 = 47
    • Ⅴ. 논의 및 결론 = 49
    • 1. 논의 = 49
    • 2. 결론 및 제언 = 56
    • 참고문헌
    • 부록
    • Abstract
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼