RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      부산시 주거 불량지역의 주거수준에 대한 區別 비교연구 : 부산시 남구와 부산진구를 중심으로 = (A) study on the housing-level to the 2 degraded districts of housing in Pusan city : focused on Nam-Gu and Pusanjin-Gu in Pusan city

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9929763

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to establish the index of Housing Satisfaction and Housing Environment and to compare the Housing-Level Value in 2 degraded districts of Pusan City. Another purpose is contributed to Housing Policy Election for Low-Income People in considering the housing-market characteristics and the difference of housing-level in district variety Conclusion is as follows :
      First, so far the direction and the improvement device of housing-policy have been changed in a varienty of facts. In focusing the problems of low-income people and housing-level improvement,「settlement-quality satisfaction」 is more important than 「physical housing situation-quantity supply」.
      Second, legal articles are arranged in the value of housing-level prediction and the optimal size to satisfy housing needs, various housing types, which are focused on social housing for low-income people(the inhabitants of housing degraded districts).
      Third, housing-situation, the degree of housing- satifaction and housing environment satisfaction are examined in housing-degraded districts(Pusan jin Gu= 161 person , Nam Gu = 161 person). The conclusion mentioned in third is as follows.
      1. By district speciality, housing condition of degraded district is totally known to be insufficient.
      2. (ⅰ) Totally, housing-satisfaction value does not come to 3 point(2.9 point in Pusanjin Gu, and 2.8 point in Nam Gu but Pusanjin Gu weakens inner-structure of housing and is insufficient green-space more than Nam Gu.
      (ⅱ) Wholly, housing-environment satisfaction degree is not beyond 3 point in Pusanjin Gu and Nam Gu. Healthy surrounding is higher Nam Gu than Pusanjin Gu but sanitation, shopping, leisure and traffic condition is opposite.
      3. In according to district-speciality, housing-moving tendency is seen to move in the same district, because many people above 40 percentage are engaged in owning their small market for their living.
      Two housing-degraded districts should reestablish urbanization system and neighborhood area of life system. To conclude, Pusanjin Gu need to secure the small-scale green space and Nam Gu is obliged to construct neighborhood area of life system suitable in overall city system.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to establish the index of Housing Satisfaction and Housing Environment and to compare the Housing-Level Value in 2 degraded districts of Pusan City. Another purpose is contributed to Housing Policy Election for Low-Income ...

      The purpose of this study is to establish the index of Housing Satisfaction and Housing Environment and to compare the Housing-Level Value in 2 degraded districts of Pusan City. Another purpose is contributed to Housing Policy Election for Low-Income People in considering the housing-market characteristics and the difference of housing-level in district variety Conclusion is as follows :
      First, so far the direction and the improvement device of housing-policy have been changed in a varienty of facts. In focusing the problems of low-income people and housing-level improvement,「settlement-quality satisfaction」 is more important than 「physical housing situation-quantity supply」.
      Second, legal articles are arranged in the value of housing-level prediction and the optimal size to satisfy housing needs, various housing types, which are focused on social housing for low-income people(the inhabitants of housing degraded districts).
      Third, housing-situation, the degree of housing- satifaction and housing environment satisfaction are examined in housing-degraded districts(Pusan jin Gu= 161 person , Nam Gu = 161 person). The conclusion mentioned in third is as follows.
      1. By district speciality, housing condition of degraded district is totally known to be insufficient.
      2. (ⅰ) Totally, housing-satisfaction value does not come to 3 point(2.9 point in Pusanjin Gu, and 2.8 point in Nam Gu but Pusanjin Gu weakens inner-structure of housing and is insufficient green-space more than Nam Gu.
      (ⅱ) Wholly, housing-environment satisfaction degree is not beyond 3 point in Pusanjin Gu and Nam Gu. Healthy surrounding is higher Nam Gu than Pusanjin Gu but sanitation, shopping, leisure and traffic condition is opposite.
      3. In according to district-speciality, housing-moving tendency is seen to move in the same district, because many people above 40 percentage are engaged in owning their small market for their living.
      Two housing-degraded districts should reestablish urbanization system and neighborhood area of life system. To conclude, Pusanjin Gu need to secure the small-scale green space and Nam Gu is obliged to construct neighborhood area of life system suitable in overall city system.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • 제1장 서론 = 1
      • 제1절 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 제2절 연구 범위 및 방법 = 3
      • 1. 연구 범위와 연구 문제 = 3
      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • 제1장 서론 = 1
      • 제1절 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 제2절 연구 범위 및 방법 = 3
      • 1. 연구 범위와 연구 문제 = 3
      • 2. 용어의 정의 = 5
      • 1) 주거 불량지역 = 5
      • 2) 주거수준 = 7
      • 제2장 변화되는 주택정책과 주거수준에 관한 고찰 = 9
      • 제1절 주택정책의 방향과 질적 개선방안 = 9
      • 제2절 주거환경 개선과 주거수준 측정과의 관련성 = 18
      • 1. 사회주택 대두와 주거수준과의 관련성 비교에 관한 선행 연구 = 18
      • 2. 주거수준 결정요인 = 31
      • 제3장 연구 방법 및 분석 = 38
      • 제1절 조사 대상 지역 선정 및 표집방법 = 38
      • 1. 조사 대상 지역 선정 = 38
      • 2. 표집방법 = 40
      • 제2절 측정도구 및 분석방법 = 41
      • 1. 측정도구 = 41
      • 2. 분석방법 = 41
      • 제3절 조사 대상자의 사회 · 인구학적 특성 = 42
      • 제4장 결과 및 논의 = 45
      • 제1절 조사 대상 지역의 주거수준 측정치 區別 비교 = 45
      • 1. 주택현황에 대한 區別 비교 = 45
      • 2. 주택 · 주거환경 만족도에 대한 구별(區別) 비교 = 52
      • 제2절 거주경력 및 부가적 특성에 대한 區別 비교 = 60
      • 제3절 소결 = 66
      • 제5장 결론 = 69
      • 참고문헌 = 72
      • Abstract = 76
      • 설문지 = 78
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼