民事訴訟의 先決問題로서의 行政行爲의 效力에 關한 硏究 : A Study on the Efficacy of the Administrative Behavior as a Preconsideration in Civil Suit

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As to whether the efficacy of the'3dmlnistrative behavior as a preconsideration in civil suit can be judged by the civil court, the scholars concerned are different In view and opinion, and the leading cases concerned have also been varied.
It is, however, thought of as proper, as in agreement with the views of some scholars concerned, that the supreme court should approve the fairness of the administrative behavior, by fixing the judicial confusions caused by the variance of the recant loading case 'C' to the case 'B', and thus that the civil court should not judge the fairness of the efficacy of the administrative behavior as a preconsideration so far as not 'just invalidity'

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 一.問題의 提起
• 二.세가지判例의 紹介
• (一) A判例
• (二) B判例
• (三) C判例
• 三.行政行爲의 無效와 取消의 區別
• (一) 無效 ㆍ取消의 槪念
• (二) 無效 ㆍ取消의 區別根據
• 1.區別의 理論的 根據
• 2.區別의 實際的 意義
• (三) 無效 ㆍ取消의 區別基準
• 四.行政行爲의 公定力
• (一) 公定力의 槪念
• (二) 公定力의 根據
• 1.理論的 根據
• 2.實定法的 根據
• (三) 公定力을 갖는 行政行爲(公定力의 對象)
• (四) 公定力이 訴訟에 미치는 影響
• 1.公定力과 立證責任의 所在
• 2.公定力이 民事訴訟에 미치는 影響
• 1) 先決問題의 개념
• 2) 先決問題의 根據
• 3) 先決問題處理에 관한 立法例
• 4) 우리 나라 學說 ㆍ 判例의 槪觀
• 五.세 判例의 考察
• 六.結語