RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지적재산권소유자의 파산과 실시(사용)권자의 보호 - 미국과 일본의 입법례를 중심으로 - = The Protection of Licensees in Bankruptcy of the Intellectual Property Licensor - focus on the United States and Japanese Bankruptcy Law -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76479004

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Technology companies typically own or license essential intellectual property. Through various contracts such as license agreements, cross-license agreements, technology com panies operate their business using valuable patents, copyrights and software. These con tract are generally deemed "executory contracts" in bankruptcy and are often the most valuable assets an e-commerce or dot.com debtor possesses. However, a bankruptcy filing may strip the value of such executory contracts and cripple a company's efforts to recognize.
    The bursting of the bubble company within the last few years and the landslide of bankruptcy filings by big companies have spot lighted the importance of intellectual property assets in bankruptcy cases, especially the licensee will require assurances that continued use of the intellectual property in that case of licensor's bankruptcy. But bankruptcy can noy be predicted, even by a through analysis of the licensor's financial statutes and since the scope of the protection for intellectual property law is often uncertain, other avenues of protection must be investigated.
    In 1988, The United States congress amend the federal bankruptcy code for the purpose of intellectual property licensee protection, Congress drafted 11 USC 365(n) to permit a nondebtor licensee to continue using the license notwithstanding its rejection by the debtor/licensor. In 2004, Japanese amend the bankruptcy law following the US model. The writer review the background and effect of such law. The lessons from the US and Japanese legislative history will contribute the future shape of Korea bankruptcy law.
    번역하기

    Technology companies typically own or license essential intellectual property. Through various contracts such as license agreements, cross-license agreements, technology com panies operate their business using valuable patents, copyrights and software...

    Technology companies typically own or license essential intellectual property. Through various contracts such as license agreements, cross-license agreements, technology com panies operate their business using valuable patents, copyrights and software. These con tract are generally deemed "executory contracts" in bankruptcy and are often the most valuable assets an e-commerce or dot.com debtor possesses. However, a bankruptcy filing may strip the value of such executory contracts and cripple a company's efforts to recognize.
    The bursting of the bubble company within the last few years and the landslide of bankruptcy filings by big companies have spot lighted the importance of intellectual property assets in bankruptcy cases, especially the licensee will require assurances that continued use of the intellectual property in that case of licensor's bankruptcy. But bankruptcy can noy be predicted, even by a through analysis of the licensor's financial statutes and since the scope of the protection for intellectual property law is often uncertain, other avenues of protection must be investigated.
    In 1988, The United States congress amend the federal bankruptcy code for the purpose of intellectual property licensee protection, Congress drafted 11 USC 365(n) to permit a nondebtor licensee to continue using the license notwithstanding its rejection by the debtor/licensor. In 2004, Japanese amend the bankruptcy law following the US model. The writer review the background and effect of such law. The lessons from the US and Japanese legislative history will contribute the future shape of Korea bankruptcy law.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 미국파산법
    • Ⅲ. 일본 파산법
    • Ⅳ. 결론
    • [참고문헌]
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 미국파산법
    • Ⅲ. 일본 파산법
    • Ⅳ. 결론
    • [참고문헌]
    • 【ABSTRACT】
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "미국에 있어서 공개법인 파산사태와 이에 대한 대응" 한국상사판례학회 14 : 2003.

    2 "米國倒産法アプロ?チを踏まえたライセンス契約の保護策の檢討" 松雄堂出版 2004.

    3 "エレクトロニクスㆍIT 業界におけるライセンス契約と破産等の關係について" 松雄堂出版 2004.

    4 "The Elements of Bankruptcy" New York Foundation Press 2001.

    5 Jonathan L. Mezrich, "Source Code Escrow:An Excersise in Futility?" 2001.

    6 "Software Escrow, a Solution in Ger many" 2004

    7 "Selected Intellectual Property Issues Arising in Bankruptcy Cases Presented at the Licensing Executi ves Society" Inc. 39th Annual Meeting 2003

    8 "Protecting Your Intellectual property in Bankruptcy Cases The Business Law Section at the State Bar of Michigan's 2002 Annual Meeting" 2002

    9 "Introduction to Bankruptcy Law" Thompson Delmar Learning 2005.

    10 "E-Government" Sage publications 2004.

    1 "미국에 있어서 공개법인 파산사태와 이에 대한 대응" 한국상사판례학회 14 : 2003.

    2 "米國倒産法アプロ?チを踏まえたライセンス契約の保護策の檢討" 松雄堂出版 2004.

    3 "エレクトロニクスㆍIT 業界におけるライセンス契約と破産等の關係について" 松雄堂出版 2004.

    4 "The Elements of Bankruptcy" New York Foundation Press 2001.

    5 Jonathan L. Mezrich, "Source Code Escrow:An Excersise in Futility?" 2001.

    6 "Software Escrow, a Solution in Ger many" 2004

    7 "Selected Intellectual Property Issues Arising in Bankruptcy Cases Presented at the Licensing Executi ves Society" Inc. 39th Annual Meeting 2003

    8 "Protecting Your Intellectual property in Bankruptcy Cases The Business Law Section at the State Bar of Michigan's 2002 Annual Meeting" 2002

    9 "Introduction to Bankruptcy Law" Thompson Delmar Learning 2005.

    10 "E-Government" Sage publications 2004.

    11 "Crystallizing the Intellectual Property Licenses in Bankruptcy Act: A Proposed solution to achieve Congress' intent" 1997

    12 "Congress passes new legislation protecting licensees of intellectual property?"

    13 "Bankruptcy Considerations in Technology Transactions" 23-, 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.11 1.11 1.07
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.99 0.99 1.176 0.45
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼