RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    메스암페타민사범의 양형에 있어서 법적 요소와 법외적 요소의 영향 = Legal and Extra-Legal Factors on the Length of Sentence for Methamphetamine Offenders in S. Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104836487

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study addresses the effects of legal and extra-legal factors on sentencing disparity among S. Korean methamphetamine offenders and evaluates the efficacy of the two major theoretical perspectives - the formal rationality versus substantive rationality - explaining the sentencing disparity. The data come from 「The Realities of Legal Disposal against Drug Criminals」(2002) by the Korean Institute of Criminology. This study is based on the analysis of 1,297 methamphetamine offenders. The result of analysis indicates, in terms of the coefficient of determination, the legal factors are much stronger than extra-legal factors in explaining sentencing disparity among methamphetamine offenders. More specifically,among legal factors, the positive effects of Number of accomplice, Type of drug crime, Continuity of crime, and History of repeated offenses were significant, while, among extra-legal factors, the positive effects of Denial of charge and Gender (Male) were significant. Therefore, this study concludes the formal rationality perspective is more effective in explaining the sentencing decision making practices of the Korean justice system, than the substantive rationality perspective.
    번역하기

    This study addresses the effects of legal and extra-legal factors on sentencing disparity among S. Korean methamphetamine offenders and evaluates the efficacy of the two major theoretical perspectives - the formal rationality versus substantive ration...

    This study addresses the effects of legal and extra-legal factors on sentencing disparity among S. Korean methamphetamine offenders and evaluates the efficacy of the two major theoretical perspectives - the formal rationality versus substantive rationality - explaining the sentencing disparity. The data come from 「The Realities of Legal Disposal against Drug Criminals」(2002) by the Korean Institute of Criminology. This study is based on the analysis of 1,297 methamphetamine offenders. The result of analysis indicates, in terms of the coefficient of determination, the legal factors are much stronger than extra-legal factors in explaining sentencing disparity among methamphetamine offenders. More specifically,among legal factors, the positive effects of Number of accomplice, Type of drug crime, Continuity of crime, and History of repeated offenses were significant, while, among extra-legal factors, the positive effects of Denial of charge and Gender (Male) were significant. Therefore, this study concludes the formal rationality perspective is more effective in explaining the sentencing decision making practices of the Korean justice system, than the substantive rationality perspective.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이민식, "성과 양형: 마약류사범을 중심으로" 한국형사정책연구원 16 (16): 155-196, 2005

    2 김명숙, "막스베버의 법사회학" 한울아카데미 2003

    3 신의기, "마약류 사범 처리 실태: 수사 및 재판기록을 중심으로" 한국형 사정 책연구원 2002

    4 Spohn, C., "Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process" 3 : 427-501, 2000

    5 Mears, D. P., "Theorizing sanctioning in a criminalized Juvenile Court" 38 : 983-1019, 2000

    6 Steffensmeier, D., "The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male" 36 : 763-798, 1998

    7 Bishop, D., "The influence of race in juvenile justice processing" 25 : 242-263, 1988

    8 Zata, M., "The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decisionmaking: Looking toward the 21st century" 3 : 503-552, 2000

    9 Steen, S., "The Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Charging and Sentencing Processes for Drug Offenders in Three Counties of Washington State" Olympia Washington 2005

    10 D'Alessio, S. J., "Socioeconomic status and the sentencing of the traditional offender" 21 : 61-77, 1993

    1 이민식, "성과 양형: 마약류사범을 중심으로" 한국형사정책연구원 16 (16): 155-196, 2005

    2 김명숙, "막스베버의 법사회학" 한울아카데미 2003

    3 신의기, "마약류 사범 처리 실태: 수사 및 재판기록을 중심으로" 한국형 사정 책연구원 2002

    4 Spohn, C., "Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process" 3 : 427-501, 2000

    5 Mears, D. P., "Theorizing sanctioning in a criminalized Juvenile Court" 38 : 983-1019, 2000

    6 Steffensmeier, D., "The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male" 36 : 763-798, 1998

    7 Bishop, D., "The influence of race in juvenile justice processing" 25 : 242-263, 1988

    8 Zata, M., "The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decisionmaking: Looking toward the 21st century" 3 : 503-552, 2000

    9 Steen, S., "The Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Charging and Sentencing Processes for Drug Offenders in Three Counties of Washington State" Olympia Washington 2005

    10 D'Alessio, S. J., "Socioeconomic status and the sentencing of the traditional offender" 21 : 61-77, 1993

    11 Ulmer, J. T., "Social Worlds of Sentencing: Court Communities under Sentencing Guidelines" SUNY Press 1997

    12 Albonetti, C., "Sentencing under federal sentencing guidelines: Effect of defendants characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentencing outcomes for drug offender, 1991‐ 1992" 31 : 789-822, 1992

    13 Kramer, J. H., "Sentencing guidelines: Lessons from Pennsylvania" Lynne Rienner Publishers 2009

    14 Moore, C. A., "Regulated and unregulated sentencing decisions: An analysis of first-year practices under Minnesota's felony sentencing guidelines" 20 : 253-277, 1986

    15 Mustard, D., "Racial, ethnic and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U. S. federal courts" 44 : 1-30, 2001

    16 Savelsberg, J., "Law that does not fit society: Sentencing guidelines as a neoclassical reaction to the dilemmas of substantivized law" 97 : 1346-1381, 1992

    17 이민식, "LSI-R 위험요인과 양형" 한국공안행정학회 18 (18): 215-247, 2009

    18 Spohn, C., "Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multi‐site study of gender, race, and imprisonment" 1 : 149-184, 2000

    19 Frase, R. S., "Implementing commission-based sentencing guidelines: The lessons of the first ten years in Minnesota" 2 : 278-337, 1993

    20 Daly, K., "Gender, race, and sentencing" 22 : 201-252, 1997

    21 Stacey, A., "Gender and the social costs of sentencing: An analysis of sentencing imposed on male and female offenders in three U. S. district court" 11 : 281-306, 2006

    22 Steffensmeier, D., "Gender and imprisonment decisions" 31 : 411-446, 1993

    23 Hagan, J., "Extra-legal attributes and criminal sentencing: An assessment of a sociological viewpoint" 8 : 357-383, 1974

    24 Engen, R., "Discretion and disparity under sentencing guidelines: The role of departures and structured sentencing alternatives" 41 : 99-130, 2003

    25 Everett, R., "Difference, disparity, and racial/ethnic bias in federal sentencing" 18 : 189-211, 2002

    26 May, D., "Corrections and the Criminal Justice System" Jones & Bartlett Publishers 2007

    27 Kautt, P, "Assessing blameworthiness and assigning punishment: Theoretical perspectives on judicial decision making. in: Criminal Justice Theory" Routledge 155-180, 2007

    28 Albonetti, C., "An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion" 38 : 247-266, 1991

    29 Taylor, J. G., "An analysis of defense counsel in the processing of felony defendants in Denver" 50 : 9-43, 1973

    30 Steffensmeier, D., "Age differences in sentencing" 12 : 583-602, 1995

    31 Williams, R., "A comparison of sentencing outcomes for defendants with public defenders versus retained counsel in a Florida circuit court" 23 : 249-258, 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.06 1.06 0.95
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.94 1.03 1.215 0.18
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼