RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      공기보다 가벼운 가스 사용시설의 폭발위험장소 설정방안에 대한 연구 = A Study on Classification of Explosion Hazardous Area for Facilities using Lighter-than-Air Gases

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100082945

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      There have been controversies over whether explosion hazardous area (EHA) should be classified for facilities which use lighter-than-air gases such as city gas, hydrogen and ammonia. Two view points are confronting each other: an economic piont of view that these gases are lighter than air and disperse rapidly, hence do not form EHA upon release into the atmosphere, and a safety point of view that they are also inflammable gases, hence can form EHA although the extent is limited compared to heavy gases. But various standards such as KS, IEC, API, NFPA do not exclude light gases when classifying EHA and present examples of EHA for light gas facilities. This study calculates EHA using the hypothetical volume in the IEC code where the hole sizes required for the calculation were selected according to various nominal pipe sizes in such a way to conform to the EHA data in the API code and HSL. Then, 25 leakage scenarios were suggested for 5 different pipe sizes and 5 operating pressures that cover typical operating conditions of light gas facilities. The EHA for the minimum leakage scenario (25 mm pipe, 0.01MPa pressure) was found to correspond to a hypothetical volume larger than 0.1 m3 (medium-level ventilation). This confirms the validity of classifying EHA for facilities using lighter-than-air gases. Finally, a computer program called HACPL was developed for easy use by light gas facilities that classifies EHA according to operating pressures and pipe sizes.
      번역하기

      There have been controversies over whether explosion hazardous area (EHA) should be classified for facilities which use lighter-than-air gases such as city gas, hydrogen and ammonia. Two view points are confronting each other: an economic piont of vie...

      There have been controversies over whether explosion hazardous area (EHA) should be classified for facilities which use lighter-than-air gases such as city gas, hydrogen and ammonia. Two view points are confronting each other: an economic piont of view that these gases are lighter than air and disperse rapidly, hence do not form EHA upon release into the atmosphere, and a safety point of view that they are also inflammable gases, hence can form EHA although the extent is limited compared to heavy gases. But various standards such as KS, IEC, API, NFPA do not exclude light gases when classifying EHA and present examples of EHA for light gas facilities. This study calculates EHA using the hypothetical volume in the IEC code where the hole sizes required for the calculation were selected according to various nominal pipe sizes in such a way to conform to the EHA data in the API code and HSL. Then, 25 leakage scenarios were suggested for 5 different pipe sizes and 5 operating pressures that cover typical operating conditions of light gas facilities. The EHA for the minimum leakage scenario (25 mm pipe, 0.01MPa pressure) was found to correspond to a hypothetical volume larger than 0.1 m3 (medium-level ventilation). This confirms the validity of classifying EHA for facilities using lighter-than-air gases. Finally, a computer program called HACPL was developed for easy use by light gas facilities that classifies EHA according to operating pressures and pipe sizes.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Technical Guideline for Source Modelling"

      2 "Technical Guideline for Classification and Management of Gas Explosion Hazardous Area"

      3 "Recommended Practice for Classification of Locations for Electrical Installations at Petroleum Facilities Classified as Class I, Zone 0, Zone 1, and Zone 2"

      4 "Recommended Practice for Classification of Class I Hazardoud(Classified) Locations for Electrical Installation in Chemical Process Areas"

      5 "Perry's Chemical Engineers's Handbook" 2008

      6 "Explosive atmospheres - Part 10-1 :Classification of Areas-Explosive Gas Atmospheres"

      7 "Explosive Atmospheres - Part 10-1: Classification of Areas-Explosive Gas Atmospheres"

      8 OSHRI, "Development of Consequence Analysis Model &Software for Chemical Process" Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency 14-40, 2000

      9 Ryu Cheol-Jin, "Consequence Analysis" Korea Occupational Safety &Health Agency 52-59, 2004

      10 Health and Safety Laboratory, "CFD Modelling of Low Pressure Jets for Area Classification" 3-5, 2005

      1 "Technical Guideline for Source Modelling"

      2 "Technical Guideline for Classification and Management of Gas Explosion Hazardous Area"

      3 "Recommended Practice for Classification of Locations for Electrical Installations at Petroleum Facilities Classified as Class I, Zone 0, Zone 1, and Zone 2"

      4 "Recommended Practice for Classification of Class I Hazardoud(Classified) Locations for Electrical Installation in Chemical Process Areas"

      5 "Perry's Chemical Engineers's Handbook" 2008

      6 "Explosive atmospheres - Part 10-1 :Classification of Areas-Explosive Gas Atmospheres"

      7 "Explosive Atmospheres - Part 10-1: Classification of Areas-Explosive Gas Atmospheres"

      8 OSHRI, "Development of Consequence Analysis Model &Software for Chemical Process" Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency 14-40, 2000

      9 Ryu Cheol-Jin, "Consequence Analysis" Korea Occupational Safety &Health Agency 52-59, 2004

      10 Health and Safety Laboratory, "CFD Modelling of Low Pressure Jets for Area Classification" 3-5, 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 산업안전학회지 -> 한국안전학회지 KCI등재
      2005-02-28 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국산업안전학회 -> 한국안전학회
      영문명 : The Korean Institute Of Industrial Safety -> The Korean Society of Safety
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.3 0.3 0.31
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.28 0.27 0.519 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼