RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    家事裁判의 旣判力 = Res Judicata of Judgments of Family cases

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82448938

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Family Litigation Act has one provision about res judicata That is Family Litigation Act Article 21 which states "(1) Final and conclusive judgment which has admitted a claim of the case of family litigation of Category A or B, shall have the effect on a third person (2) When a judgment rejecting the claim under paragraph (1) has been made final and conclusive, other persons entitled to institute a litigation may not file a litigation again, unless there exists any justifiable reason for having not been able to participate before closing the pleadings in the fact-finding proceedings"
    Family Litigation Act Article 12 states "Except as otherwise prescribed in this Act, the procedures for the family litigation shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Procedure Act"
    Family Litigation Act Article 21 is the exceptional provision concerning subjective scope of res judicata of judgments of family litigation So, except subjective scope of res jedicata, res judicata of judgments of family litigation is the same as that of the judgments of civil litigation
    In this article this writer gives a overview of res judicata of judgments of civil litigation Next to that, this writer goes into interpretation of Family Litigation Act Article 21, objective scope of res judicata of judgments of family litigation, temporal scope of res judicata of judgments of family litigation, res judicata of decision of family non-litigation, res judicata of family conciliation, res judicata of foreign judgements of family litigation and so on
    Lastly some cases of Seoul Family Court which had res jedicata issues are introduced
    번역하기

    Family Litigation Act has one provision about res judicata That is Family Litigation Act Article 21 which states "(1) Final and conclusive judgment which has admitted a claim of the case of family litigation of Category A or B, shall have the effect o...

    Family Litigation Act has one provision about res judicata That is Family Litigation Act Article 21 which states "(1) Final and conclusive judgment which has admitted a claim of the case of family litigation of Category A or B, shall have the effect on a third person (2) When a judgment rejecting the claim under paragraph (1) has been made final and conclusive, other persons entitled to institute a litigation may not file a litigation again, unless there exists any justifiable reason for having not been able to participate before closing the pleadings in the fact-finding proceedings"
    Family Litigation Act Article 12 states "Except as otherwise prescribed in this Act, the procedures for the family litigation shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Procedure Act"
    Family Litigation Act Article 21 is the exceptional provision concerning subjective scope of res judicata of judgments of family litigation So, except subjective scope of res jedicata, res judicata of judgments of family litigation is the same as that of the judgments of civil litigation
    In this article this writer gives a overview of res judicata of judgments of civil litigation Next to that, this writer goes into interpretation of Family Litigation Act Article 21, objective scope of res judicata of judgments of family litigation, temporal scope of res judicata of judgments of family litigation, res judicata of decision of family non-litigation, res judicata of family conciliation, res judicata of foreign judgements of family litigation and so on
    Lastly some cases of Seoul Family Court which had res jedicata issues are introduced

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ 序論
    • Ⅱ 민사소송에서의 기판력
    • Ⅲ 가사재판의 기판력
    • Ⅳ 結論
    • Ⅴ 참고문헌
    • Ⅰ 序論
    • Ⅱ 민사소송에서의 기판력
    • Ⅲ 가사재판의 기판력
    • Ⅳ 結論
    • Ⅴ 참고문헌
    • Ⅵ 영문초록
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" 박영사 2007

    2 오상진, "이혼원인에 있어서 유책주의와 파탄주의"

    3 이시윤, "신민사소송법" 박영사 2009

    4 조수정, "변론종결 이후에 발생한 새로운 사유" 21 : 2000

    5 새 가사소송법의 개설, "박병호교수환갑기념" 1991

    6 호문혁, "민사소송법" 법문사 2008

    7 정동윤, "민사소송법" 법문사 2009

    8 국순욱, "기판력의 본질과 작용" 11 (11): 2003

    9 강현중, "기판력에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 19 : 99-149, 2007

    10 법원행정처, "개정증보 법원실무제요 가사"

    1 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" 박영사 2007

    2 오상진, "이혼원인에 있어서 유책주의와 파탄주의"

    3 이시윤, "신민사소송법" 박영사 2009

    4 조수정, "변론종결 이후에 발생한 새로운 사유" 21 : 2000

    5 새 가사소송법의 개설, "박병호교수환갑기념" 1991

    6 호문혁, "민사소송법" 법문사 2008

    7 정동윤, "민사소송법" 법문사 2009

    8 국순욱, "기판력의 본질과 작용" 11 (11): 2003

    9 강현중, "기판력에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 19 : 99-149, 2007

    10 법원행정처, "개정증보 법원실무제요 가사"

    11 박동섭, "가사소송실무" 법률문화원 2006

    12 법원행정처, "가사비송재판실무편람"

    13 三代川 俊一郞, "改訂人事訴訟法槪說 in 判決の效力及び判決に對する不服申立ての取扱い" 日本加除出版 2007

    14 佐上善和, "家事審判法" 信山社 2007

    15 德田和幸, "家事審判の旣判力" (1100) : 2002

    16 高田昌宏, "家事事件手續法" 有斐閣 2007

    17 大橋眞弓, "家事事件手續法" 有斐閣 2007

    18 島岡大雄, "家事事件の現況 in 乙類審判 における 先行審判の むし返 しの可否" 判例タイムズ社 2006

    19 海勞澤美廣, "外國離婚判決(子の監護裁判を含む)の效力" (1100) : 2002

    20 김원태, "外國家事裁判의 承認과 執行" 嶺南民事法學會 嶺南民事訴訟法學會 5 : 2002

    21 春日偉知郞, "卽時抗告をめぐる諸問題" (1100) : 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-06-13 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Korean Law -> Korean Journal of Family Law KCI등재
    2005-06-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Korean Law -> Korean Journal of Family Law KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.87 0.87 0.83
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.77 0.77 0.758 0.5
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼