RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      전기통신사업법상 이용자이익 보호에 관한 고찰 = A Study on the Protection of Users` Interest in the Korean Telecommunications Act

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102072944

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Until recently, consumer issues in the telecommunications industry had not given a particular interest. In this field the terms like users are in use, therefore regulatory system aiming at end-users or consumer has not been established. Considering that market principles along with public interest considerations are being introduced and competition becomes effective their scope, consumer issues are becoming of more importance. At this momentum, it is necessary to incorporate telecom consumer into the current regulatory system and construct a coherent and intrinsic system of telecom consumer. For this purpose, the principle of private autonomy should be more widely adopted in terms and conditions in the telecom markets. Above all, the free contract should be guaranteed not only to users but also to telecom companies and in the field of universal services competition principle should be taken into account as much as possible. Prior to an agreement, critical information should be sufficiently provided. Furthermore, informational obligation, calculation of rates, cancellation or repeal of the contract, etc. which are of utmost importance for users` interests are explicitly prescribed in the Korean Telecommunications Act. Finally, in that quality of telecom services is related to investment and rate level, the merits of facilities-based competition should be made full use of. In spite of partial legitimacy of network neutrality, proper sharing of investment costs should be discussed for sustainable development of telecom ecosystem and accompanying stable protection of users` interest.
      번역하기

      Until recently, consumer issues in the telecommunications industry had not given a particular interest. In this field the terms like users are in use, therefore regulatory system aiming at end-users or consumer has not been established. Considering th...

      Until recently, consumer issues in the telecommunications industry had not given a particular interest. In this field the terms like users are in use, therefore regulatory system aiming at end-users or consumer has not been established. Considering that market principles along with public interest considerations are being introduced and competition becomes effective their scope, consumer issues are becoming of more importance. At this momentum, it is necessary to incorporate telecom consumer into the current regulatory system and construct a coherent and intrinsic system of telecom consumer. For this purpose, the principle of private autonomy should be more widely adopted in terms and conditions in the telecom markets. Above all, the free contract should be guaranteed not only to users but also to telecom companies and in the field of universal services competition principle should be taken into account as much as possible. Prior to an agreement, critical information should be sufficiently provided. Furthermore, informational obligation, calculation of rates, cancellation or repeal of the contract, etc. which are of utmost importance for users` interests are explicitly prescribed in the Korean Telecommunications Act. Finally, in that quality of telecom services is related to investment and rate level, the merits of facilities-based competition should be made full use of. In spite of partial legitimacy of network neutrality, proper sharing of investment costs should be discussed for sustainable development of telecom ecosystem and accompanying stable protection of users` interest.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최봉경, "정보통신과 공정거래" 법문사 194-, 2006

      2 "전자상거래소비자보호법 제1조"

      3 이봉의, "전기통신사업법상 소매규제의 개편방안" 1 (1): 25-, 2008

      4 "전기통신사업법 제1조"

      5 박동욱, "융합환경에서의 방송통신사업 분류체계와 진입규제" 3 (3): 102-112, 2010

      6 전주용, "신규이용자보호 이슈대응 및 이용자권리보호를 위한 정책방향연구" 2011

      7 손금주, "방송통신위원회의 이용자보호절차 개관" 3 (3): 174-182, 2010

      8 이봉의, "방송․통신시장에 있어서 기업결합 규제절차"

      9 "공정거래법 제1조"

      10 Robert H. Lande, "Wealth Transfers as the Original and Primary Concern of Antitrust: The Efficiency Interpretation Challenged" 34 : 65-123, 1982

      1 최봉경, "정보통신과 공정거래" 법문사 194-, 2006

      2 "전자상거래소비자보호법 제1조"

      3 이봉의, "전기통신사업법상 소매규제의 개편방안" 1 (1): 25-, 2008

      4 "전기통신사업법 제1조"

      5 박동욱, "융합환경에서의 방송통신사업 분류체계와 진입규제" 3 (3): 102-112, 2010

      6 전주용, "신규이용자보호 이슈대응 및 이용자권리보호를 위한 정책방향연구" 2011

      7 손금주, "방송통신위원회의 이용자보호절차 개관" 3 (3): 174-182, 2010

      8 이봉의, "방송․통신시장에 있어서 기업결합 규제절차"

      9 "공정거래법 제1조"

      10 Robert H. Lande, "Wealth Transfers as the Original and Primary Concern of Antitrust: The Efficiency Interpretation Challenged" 34 : 65-123, 1982

      11 "TKG 제3조 20호"

      12 "TKG 제150조 제9항"

      13 Franz Jürger Säcker, "Mager, In Berliner Kommentar zum Telekommunikationsgesetz" 1548-, 2006

      14 Damjanovic, "Handbuch des Telekommunikationsrechts" 2006

      15 "Directive of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 제2조"

      16 Elisabeth Grote, "Die Telekommunikations-Kundenschutzverordnung" BB 1118-, 1998

      17 Christina Heßler, "Der Verbraucherschutz im Telekommunikationsrecht" 95-, 2003

      18 "2002년의 보편적 역무지침(Universal Service Directive) 제4조 제1항"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.86 0.86 0.93
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.86 0.981 0.86
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼