RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    몽골 민주화 이행과정의 분석 = A Study on Transitions to Democracy in Mongolia

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104832529

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Democratization is political transition from different to each other two regime, which it affected by citizen’s political movement, political opinion and political system. Soviet Union’s introduction of Perestroika and Glasnost which finally contributed to the Soviet Union’s collapse and led to tentative reforms in Mongolia. Thus these process was expounding to free-election system and multi-party system.
    This thesis will analyze the condition of Mongolian transition and compared to term, it was shorter than other examples. In addition Mongolia has move through the socialist one party system to open and multi political system, result of parliamental election and change to Mongolian foreign policy for two decade.
    In 1989-1990, began the transition from socialist regime to democracy and highlight some of the problems, which have been encountered during this process. So after the changed election system, Mongolian People’s Revolutionary party was win and a single party government was formed the election of 1990, 1992 and 2000. Thus, democratic openings and allowed new governments to alternate in power both the 1992 and 1996 national elections. In the 2000 election results showed that the Mongolian people put considerable hope and confidence in the Mongolian People’s Revolutionary Party. When this time parliament approved many action programs and privatizations.
    Furthermore, Mongolian foreign policy was closed and one point on USSR and socialist bloc countries until the 1990. After the democratization improve the plural and third neighbours policy Mongolia has been connect to foreign policy by the other ways.
    Mongolia’s democratic transition can be summarized as follows: First of all, political system changed to democratic and multi-party system. Before the transition, when this time MPRP always decided problem of social and located on top of the political system.
    Second, election system has been changing a lot of difference for last two decade. In addition, Socialism’s Mongolia haven’t any difference of living standard, but when this time in MPRP’s era was divided to classification of social. Mongolian electoral system had errors and difficult to choose from class of young aged workers. However free and fair election system brought a new chance in Mongolian policy but formed into majority of the parliament to new rule, “Winners will build own government and authority and today’s best political player, who will win to election of tomorrow”. Third, the most of variance had been continuing in foreign policy. Since the 1920’s Mongolia has connected to socialist bloc’s countries and closed to others. Mongolian foreign policy was changed to open and moved to pluralism since the old regime collapsed.
    At the finally, the democratic measures and condition are more develop to such as new constitution, it was legalizing free and democratic election and civic participation of politics since the transition. Nowaday examine to Mongolian political election and condition, it haven’t any response system and do not calculate to risks.
    번역하기

    Democratization is political transition from different to each other two regime, which it affected by citizen’s political movement, political opinion and political system. Soviet Union’s introduction of Perestroika and Glasnost which finally contr...

    Democratization is political transition from different to each other two regime, which it affected by citizen’s political movement, political opinion and political system. Soviet Union’s introduction of Perestroika and Glasnost which finally contributed to the Soviet Union’s collapse and led to tentative reforms in Mongolia. Thus these process was expounding to free-election system and multi-party system.
    This thesis will analyze the condition of Mongolian transition and compared to term, it was shorter than other examples. In addition Mongolia has move through the socialist one party system to open and multi political system, result of parliamental election and change to Mongolian foreign policy for two decade.
    In 1989-1990, began the transition from socialist regime to democracy and highlight some of the problems, which have been encountered during this process. So after the changed election system, Mongolian People’s Revolutionary party was win and a single party government was formed the election of 1990, 1992 and 2000. Thus, democratic openings and allowed new governments to alternate in power both the 1992 and 1996 national elections. In the 2000 election results showed that the Mongolian people put considerable hope and confidence in the Mongolian People’s Revolutionary Party. When this time parliament approved many action programs and privatizations.
    Furthermore, Mongolian foreign policy was closed and one point on USSR and socialist bloc countries until the 1990. After the democratization improve the plural and third neighbours policy Mongolia has been connect to foreign policy by the other ways.
    Mongolia’s democratic transition can be summarized as follows: First of all, political system changed to democratic and multi-party system. Before the transition, when this time MPRP always decided problem of social and located on top of the political system.
    Second, election system has been changing a lot of difference for last two decade. In addition, Socialism’s Mongolia haven’t any difference of living standard, but when this time in MPRP’s era was divided to classification of social. Mongolian electoral system had errors and difficult to choose from class of young aged workers. However free and fair election system brought a new chance in Mongolian policy but formed into majority of the parliament to new rule, “Winners will build own government and authority and today’s best political player, who will win to election of tomorrow”. Third, the most of variance had been continuing in foreign policy. Since the 1920’s Mongolia has connected to socialist bloc’s countries and closed to others. Mongolian foreign policy was changed to open and moved to pluralism since the old regime collapsed.
    At the finally, the democratic measures and condition are more develop to such as new constitution, it was legalizing free and democratic election and civic participation of politics since the transition. Nowaday examine to Mongolian political election and condition, it haven’t any response system and do not calculate to risks.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김주삼, "한·몽골의 정치경제적 관계변화와 전망" 한국세계지역학회 26 (26): 341-362, 2008

    2 김인, "중국의 중앙아시아 정책과 상하이(SCO) 협력기구의 역할" 아태지역연구센터 33 (33): 43-60, 2009

    3 임성학, "외국자본의 한국 은행산업 진입" 한국정치학회 39 (39): 189-209, 2005

    4 나효우, "아시아의 신생민주주의 몽골과 캄보디아를 가다" 8 : 28-29, 2008

    5 송병구, "민주화 이후 몽골 정치의 변화와 전망:총선과 대선을 중심으로" 한양대 480-, 2012

    6 금희연, "몽골의 체제전환과 민주화과정에 관한 연구 - 역대 총선과 대선을 중심으로 -" 한국통일전략학회 9 (9): 181-224, 2009

    7 몽골 과학아카데미, "몽골의 역사(5)" 도서출판 울란바토르 2004

    8 이정진, "몽골의 민주주의 정착과 외교정책 방향" 신아시아연구소 16 (16): 200-225, 2009

    9 "http://www.santmaral.mn"

    10 "http://www.krnew21.co.kr"

    1 김주삼, "한·몽골의 정치경제적 관계변화와 전망" 한국세계지역학회 26 (26): 341-362, 2008

    2 김인, "중국의 중앙아시아 정책과 상하이(SCO) 협력기구의 역할" 아태지역연구센터 33 (33): 43-60, 2009

    3 임성학, "외국자본의 한국 은행산업 진입" 한국정치학회 39 (39): 189-209, 2005

    4 나효우, "아시아의 신생민주주의 몽골과 캄보디아를 가다" 8 : 28-29, 2008

    5 송병구, "민주화 이후 몽골 정치의 변화와 전망:총선과 대선을 중심으로" 한양대 480-, 2012

    6 금희연, "몽골의 체제전환과 민주화과정에 관한 연구 - 역대 총선과 대선을 중심으로 -" 한국통일전략학회 9 (9): 181-224, 2009

    7 몽골 과학아카데미, "몽골의 역사(5)" 도서출판 울란바토르 2004

    8 이정진, "몽골의 민주주의 정착과 외교정책 방향" 신아시아연구소 16 (16): 200-225, 2009

    9 "http://www.santmaral.mn"

    10 "http://www.krnew21.co.kr"

    11 "http://www.comw.org/cmp/fulltext/0110jia.htm"

    12 "http://sukheeax.blog.gogo.mn/read/entry284566"

    13 "http://news.gogo.mn/r/63927"

    14 "http://news.donga.com/Column/3/04/20120711/47676978/1"

    15 "http://mng.mofa.go.kr"

    16 Geddes, B., "What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years" 2 : 115-144, 1999

    17 O’Donnell, G., "Transitions from authoritarian Rule: Tentative conclusion about uncertain democracies" Johns Hopkins University Press 1986

    18 Huntington, S. P., "The Third Wave Democratization In The Late Twentieth Century" University of Oklahoma press 1991

    19 Neubauer, D., "Some Conditions of Democracy" 61 : 1006-1007, 1967

    20 Cutright, P., "National Political Development:Measurement and Analysis" 28 : 256-, 1963

    21 Heaton, W. R., "Mongolia in 1990" 31 (31): 50-56, 1991

    22 Fritz, V., "Mongolia : The Rise and Travails of a Deviant Democracy" 15 (15): 766-788, 2008

    23 Fritz, V., "Mongolia : Dependent Democratization" 18 (18): 75-100, 2002

    24 Kh. Tsengeltuya, "Democratic Process of Mongolian Political Parties" 사회과학연구소 22 (22): 60-, 2011

    25 The State Khural, "Concept of foreign policy of Mongolia" Ulaanaabatar Print 1994

    26 Rueschemeyer, D., "Capitalist Development and Democracy" University of Chicago Press 1992

    27 Schumpeter, J., "Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy" Harper 1962

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.55 0.55 0.47
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.47 0.46 0.727 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼