不動産公示制度에 있어서 登記와 地籍의 合理的一元化方案 = A Study on the Rational Unification Scheme of Registration and Land Register|RISS 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Real estate is one of the most important goods in our economy. Real estate has became the object of the most important right in the economic activities. Therefore, in real estate, a certain public notice is required to reflect the changes of the relationship of rights. If the contents of real estate change according to subjective intention of the individuals, it is because economic life will be in big turmoil. A real right with regard to real estate is legalized. A method of public notice for legalized real right is registration. In addition, in registration, not only a real right but also real estate indication that symbolizes a real right exist and the data that become important basics to announce in public is land register, that is, a land ledger.
The change of acquisition and loss of a real right with regard to real estate by a legal action is publicized in public notice by being recorded on a registry. Through this procedure, we protect a bona-fide third party and ultimately pursue safety of transactions in real estate transactions.
In this thesis, I have studied on a public notice system of real estate.
In Korea, public notice system for land has developed in division of registration system and land register system. Registration system is a mean to realize the purpose of public notice in the administration of justice. In contrast, land register system is a public notice system of the status and matters of rights of estate for the tax administration and tax policy to collect taxes under the public law. Both systems are complete with a public notice of real estate in significant level. Not only a real estate registry but also land ledger are complete with computerization and are online to serve the people. In the relation of public notices of both systems, public notice of a registry precedes in matters regarding a real right and public notice of land ledger precedes in matters of real estate. In case registry and land ledger do not coincide, real estate indication changes or modifies a registry based on land ledger and matters of rights change or modify land ledger based on a registry.
In Korea, as public notice of real estate is in dualistic systems of a registry and land register, national budget spendings are occurring in duplicate to maintain this and also as people have to issue a registry as well as land ledger for legal activities and therefore, it is also duplicate red tape formalities and expenses spent for this is enormous too.
The purpose of this research is to find and suggest a rational unification scheme of a public notice system of real estate that is appropriate in Korean reality by comparing and examining this registration system and land register system in concept and function, through the comparison and review with foreign laws and at this stage, a rational unification plan of a registry and land register can be suggested like the followings.
Firstly, it is to establish a unification system of a registry and land ledger through computer network. A registry and land ledger before the computerization were prepared in paper and a unification of registry and land ledger was unthinkable unless agencies in charge of registry and land ledger were merged. By putting computer network of registry and land ledger into on line network (Currently, only a partial functions are connected), matters regarding changes of acquisition and loss of a real right in Gab section and Eul section of registry are processed in the Supreme Court by the application for registry as the current practice, regarding land register status, by granting authority to government servants in charge of land register to record the changes of land ledger in the title section of registry and ledgers with the completion of recording are closed and kept.
Secondly, every time when the unification of registry and land register was mentioned, the integration of registry agency and land register agency was consistently insisted. It was because the unification of registry and land register was impossible without the integration of the agencies in charge before computerization. Supreme court has developed registry system continuously and the Ministry of Government Affairs and Home Affairs has developed land register system continuously and now both of them have unrivaled professional knowledge and functions. By maximizing the excellency of the two institutions, the Supreme Court shall still maintain control of registry of unified registry and land register like the current practice and like census registration works, the Supreme Court supervises the agency of land register.
Thirdly, in implementing the unification of registry and land register, systemize and maintain various laws and regulations regarding registry system and land register system to conform to the ideology and purpose of a public notice system of real estate. A thesis for degree of Master in February 2007.

번역하기

목차 (Table of Contents)

第1章序論 1
第1節硏究의 目的 1
第2節硏究의 範圍 및 方法 2
第2章不動産公示制度의 理論的基礎 5
第1節不動産公示制度의 槪念과 公示方法 5

第1章序論 1
第1節硏究의 目的 1
第2節硏究의 範圍 및 方法 2
第2章不動産公示制度의 理論的基礎 5
第1節不動産公示制度의 槪念과 公示方法 5
Ⅰ. 不動産이라는 用語의 槪念 및 由來 5
1. 영 · 미의 경우 5
(1) estate 5
(2) real estate 5
(3) real property 5
2. 우리나라의 경우 6
Ⅱ. 公示制度의 槪念 6
Ⅲ. 公示의 原則과 公信의 原則 7
1. 公示의 原則 7
(1) 意義 7
(2) 公示方法에 관한 立法主義 7
(3) 不動産物權變動에 있어서의 公示의 原則 8
2. 公信의 原則 8
(1) 意義 8
(2) 不動産物權變動에 있어서의 公信의 原則 9
(3) 公示의 原則과 公信의 原則의 相互關係 9
3. 公示의 方法 10
(1) 物權行爲와 公示方法 10
(2) 意思主義(對抗要件主義) 11
(3) 形式主義(成立要件主義) 11
(4) 두 立法主義의 長 · 短點 12
第2節不動産公示制度의 種類와 그 起源 13
Ⅰ. 地籍制度 13
1. 地籍制度의 意義 13
2. 地籍制度의 起源 14
3. 地籍制度의 類型 15
(1) 稅地籍(Fiscal Cadastre) 15
(2) 法地籍(Legal Cadastre or Juridical　Cadatre) 15
(3) 多目的地籍(Multipurpose Cadastre) 16
4. 地籍制度의 特性 16
(1) 地籍國定主義 17
(2) 地籍形式主義 17
(3) 地籍公開主義 18
(4) 實質的審査主義 18
(5) 職權登錄主義 19
Ⅱ. 登記制度 20
1. 不動産登記制度의 意義 20
2. 登記制度의 成立 21
3. 登記制度의 原理 22
(1) 登記簿의 編成 22
(2) 登記申請主義 24
(3) 登記官의 審査權 25
(4) 成立要件主義와 對抗要件主義 25
(5) 公示의 原則 26
(6) 公信의 原則 26
(7) 國家賠償責任主義 27
Ⅲ. 地籍制度와 登記制度의 關係 28
第3章不動産公示制度의 比較法的考察 33
第1節外國의 不動産公示制度 33
Ⅰ. 日本 33
1. 地籍制度 33
2. 登記制度 34
Ⅱ. 獨逸 35
1. 地籍制度 35
2. 登記制度 36
Ⅲ. 프랑스 37
1. 地籍制度 37
2. 登記制度 39
Ⅳ. 스위스의 地籍과 登記制度 40
Ⅴ. 네덜란드의 地籍과 登記制度 41
Ⅵ. 臺灣의 地籍과 登記制度 42
Ⅶ. 小結(各國制度의 長短點評價) 43
第2節 우리나라의 不動産公示制度 44
Ⅰ. 登記制度 44
1. 登記制度의 沿革 44
(1) 第1期 (朝鮮初期- 1893년) : 立案制度活用時期 45
(2) 第2期 (1894년-1905) : 地契 · 家契制度施行 47
(3) 第3期 (1906년 - 1910년) : 證明制度導入 · 施行 48
(4) 第4期 (1910년 - 1960년) : 日本制度依用時期 48
2. 登記制度의 原理 49
(1) 物的編成主義 49
(2) 物權變動의 形式主義 49
(3) 共同出席主義 · 共同申請主義原則 49
(4) 書面에 의한 形式審査主義 50
(5) 登記의 公信力不認定 50
(6) 國家賠償責任의 認定 51
3. 登記制度의 效力 51
4. 登記管理現況 52
(1) 法的根據 52
(2) 登記簿와 登記管掌機關 53
(3) 登記業務의 電算化 54
Ⅱ. 地籍制度 56
1. 地籍制度沿革 56
(1) 第1期 (1894~1904) : 近代的地籍制度의 胎動 57
(2) 第2期 (1905~1909) : 技術者養成 및 土地調査事業着手 58
(3) 第3期 (1910~1924) : 土地 · 林野調査事業完了 58
2. 地籍制度發達過程 59
(1) 稅地籍 59
(2) 法地籍 60
(3) 多目的地籍 60
3. 地籍管理現況 61
(1) 法的根據 61
(2) 地籍公簿와 地籍行政機構 62
(3) 地籍業務電算化 63
第4章 우리나라의 不動産公示制度의 問題點과 改善方向 65
第1節登記와 地籍의 二元化問題 65
Ⅰ. 登記와 地籍의 二元化 65
Ⅱ. 登記와 地籍의 管掌機關 65
1. 管掌機關의 分離 65
2. 事務處理의 二中性 66
Ⅲ. 公示制度의 問題點 66
1. 地籍制度 67
(1) 地籍登錄事項의 公信力未備 67
(2) 土地의 移動整理에 대한 處分性否認의 問題 69
(3) 地籍不符合地의 發生 70
2. 登記制度 72
(1) 實體法上規定의 未備 72
(2) 登記簿의 複雜性 73
(3) 國民負擔의 問題 74
第2節不動産公示制度의 一元化方案 75
Ⅰ. 登記와 地籍의 一元化論議 75
1. 一元化의 意義 75
2. 一元化反對論 75
3. 一元化贊成論 79
4. 二元化構造의 長短點 80
(1) 二元化構造의 長點 80
(2) 二元化構造의 短點 81
5. 檢討 및 私見 82
Ⅱ. 登記 · 地籍의 合理的一元化方案 85
1. 槪說 85
2. 一元化된 公簿의 目的 및 機能 86
3. 登記 · 地籍의 一元化 86
(1) 內容의 一元化方案 86
(2) 公簿의 一元化方案 88
(3) 電算網에 의한 一元化 89
(4) 關聯公簿의 處理 89
4. 登記와 地籍의 管掌機關 90
第5章結論 93
參考文獻 95
ABSTRACT 99

상세검색

RISS 보유자료

상세검색

해외전자자료