목적물의 점유와 관련한 몇 가지 법적 문제 = Legal Matters in Connection with the Possession of the Object

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The title of this thesis is “Legal Matters in Connection with the Possession of the object”. Article 192 (Acquisition and Extinction of Possessory Right) of the Civil Code stipulates that (1) Anyone who has de facto control over an Article shall have possessory right to that Article. (2) Possessory right is lost if the possessor loses de facto control over the Article: Provided, That this shall not apply if possession is recovered in accordance with the provisions of Article 204. Article 197 (State of Possession) of the Civil Code stipulates that (1) A possessor is presumed to be in possession openly, peaceably, in good faith, and with the intention of holding as owner. (2) Even if a possessor is in good faith, when he fails in an action on title, he is deemed to have been a possessor in bad faith, from the time of the commencement of the action. Article 201 (Possessor and Fruits) of the Civil Code stipulates that (1) A possessor in good faith acquires the fruits of the Article in possession. (2) A possessor in bad faith is liable to return the fruits, and to make compensation for the value of fruits which have already been consumed by him, have been damaged, or have not been collected through his negligence. (3) The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to possessors by force or in secret. Article 741 (Definition of Unjust Enrichment) of the Civil Code stipulates that A person who without any legal ground derives a benefit from the property or services of another and thereby causes loss to the latter shall be bound to return such benefit. Article 748 (Amount of Benefits to be Returned by Person Enriched) of the Civil Code stipulates that (1) The person enriched in good faith shall be liable to act as set forth in Article 747 to the amount that he still possesses of such benefits. (2) A person enriched in bad faith shall return the benefits received by him together with interest, and if there has been any damage, he shall be bound also to make compensation. In this paper, I examined Legal Matters in Connection with the Possession of the object. For example, if a person has a substantial gain from using an object, there is a duty to return the unfair advantage. A person who uses an object without authority does not necessarily have a duty to return unfair benefits. Anyone who legally possesses the object is not liable for tort.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김성욱, "현행 민법규정의 적용 및 해석과 관련한 몇 가지 법적 문제- 총칙 및 물권규정을 중심으로 -" 한국재산법학회 37 (37): 75-91, 2020

2 한국사법행정학회, "제5판 주석민법, 물권(1)" 한국사법행정학회 2019

3 김재형, "점유자의 소유자에 대한 부당이득반환범위" 법조협회 (561) : 2003

4 배영일, "점유자의 과실취득과 부당이득반환청구" 2004

5 김성욱, "유치물과 관련한 몇 가지 법적 문제" 한국집합건물법학회 35 : 229-249, 2020

6 김형석, "법에서의 사실적 지배 - 우리 점유법의 특성과 문제점" 한국민사법학회 (36) : 151-198, 2007

7 한국사법행정학회, "민법주해 IV, 물권(1)" 박영사 1992

8 백태승, "민법 제201조~제203조 점유자·회복자 관계와 부당이득반환청구권과의 관계" 법학연구원 25 (25): 29-66, 2015

9 김용한, "물권법론" 박영사 1996

10 장경학, "물권법" 법문사 1987

11 이은영, "물권법" 박영사 2006

12 이영준, "물권법" 박영사 2009

13 이상태, "물권법" 법원사 2015

14 송덕수, "물권법" 박영사 2017

15 김증한, "물권법" 박영사 1997

16 김상용, "물권법" 화산미디어 2016

17 고상룡, "물권법" 법문사 2001

18 곽윤직, "물권법" 박영사 2015

19 황적인, "물권법" 법원사 1990

20 홍성재, "물권법" 동방문화사 2017

21 Kaser, "Römisches Privatrecht" 2003

22 Hübner, "Grundzüge des deutschen Privatrechts" 1922

23 Gierke, "Deutsches Privatrecht" 1905