RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      SCOPUS KCI등재

      Polished Wafer와 Epi-Layer Wafer의 표면 처리에 따른 표면 화학적/물리적 특성 = Comparison on the Physical & Chemical Characteristics in Surface of Polished Wafer and Epi-Layer Wafer

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105149796

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Physical and chemical changes in a polished wafer and in $2.5{\mu}m$ & $4{\mu}m$ epitaxially grown Si layer wafers (Epilayer wafer) after surface treatment were investigated. We characterized the influence of surface treatment on wafer properties such as surface roughness and the chemical composition and bonds. After each surface treatment, the physical change of the wafer surface was evaluated by atomic force microscopy to confirm the surface morphology and roughness. In addition, chemical changes in the wafer surface were studied by X-ray photoemission spectroscopy measurement. Changes in the chemical composition were confirmed before and after the surface treatment. By combined analysis of the physical and chemical changes, we found that diluted hydrofluoric acid treatment is more effective than buffered oxide etching for $SiO_2$ removal in both polished and Epi-Layer wafers; however, the etch rate and the surface roughness in the given treatment are different among the polished $2.5{\mu}m$ and $4{\mu}m$ Epi-layer wafers in spite of the identical bulk structural properties of these wafers. This study therefore suggests that independent surface treatment optimization is required for each wafer type, $2.5{\mu}m$ and $4{\mu}m$, due to the meaningful differences in the initial surface chemical and physical properties.
      번역하기

      Physical and chemical changes in a polished wafer and in $2.5{\mu}m$ & $4{\mu}m$ epitaxially grown Si layer wafers (Epilayer wafer) after surface treatment were investigated. We characterized the influence of surface treatment on wafer properties such...

      Physical and chemical changes in a polished wafer and in $2.5{\mu}m$ & $4{\mu}m$ epitaxially grown Si layer wafers (Epilayer wafer) after surface treatment were investigated. We characterized the influence of surface treatment on wafer properties such as surface roughness and the chemical composition and bonds. After each surface treatment, the physical change of the wafer surface was evaluated by atomic force microscopy to confirm the surface morphology and roughness. In addition, chemical changes in the wafer surface were studied by X-ray photoemission spectroscopy measurement. Changes in the chemical composition were confirmed before and after the surface treatment. By combined analysis of the physical and chemical changes, we found that diluted hydrofluoric acid treatment is more effective than buffered oxide etching for $SiO_2$ removal in both polished and Epi-Layer wafers; however, the etch rate and the surface roughness in the given treatment are different among the polished $2.5{\mu}m$ and $4{\mu}m$ Epi-layer wafers in spite of the identical bulk structural properties of these wafers. This study therefore suggests that independent surface treatment optimization is required for each wafer type, $2.5{\mu}m$ and $4{\mu}m$, due to the meaningful differences in the initial surface chemical and physical properties.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 E. P. Gusev, 59 (59): 341-, 2001

      2 V. V. Afanas’eva, 102 (102): 2007

      3 N. V. Nguyen,

      4 Senri Ojima, 144 (144): 1482-, 1997

      5 F. De Smedt, 148 (148): 487-, 2001

      6 Hongbing Liu, 402 (402): 354-, 1998

      7 Kern, W., 137 (137): 1887-, 1990

      8 L. J. Huang, 60 (60): 1108-, 1992

      9 Williams, K. R., 5 (5): 256-, 1996

      10 Kern, W., Noyes Publication 111-196, 1993

      1 E. P. Gusev, 59 (59): 341-, 2001

      2 V. V. Afanas’eva, 102 (102): 2007

      3 N. V. Nguyen,

      4 Senri Ojima, 144 (144): 1482-, 1997

      5 F. De Smedt, 148 (148): 487-, 2001

      6 Hongbing Liu, 402 (402): 354-, 1998

      7 Kern, W., 137 (137): 1887-, 1990

      8 L. J. Huang, 60 (60): 1108-, 1992

      9 Williams, K. R., 5 (5): 256-, 1996

      10 Kern, W., Noyes Publication 111-196, 1993

      11 Nancy A. Burnham, 7 (7): 2906-, 1989

      12 Harald Proksche, "Giinter Nagorsen and Detlef Ross" 160 (160): 521-, 1992

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2014-03-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (기타) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.15 0.15 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.14 0.13 0.255 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼