RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    행복의 그림자: 자유와 폭력의 경계에서 = Shadow of happiness

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99894162

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article is designed to illuminate light and shadow in the discourse on happiness. In this process, I orient the discours of happiness that maximizes freedom and minimizes the violence. To do this, I am first interested in the dialectical relation between freedom and violence(1). And I talk critically about Epicurus and Aristotle`s position. In this conversation with them, I argue that the theory of happiness get out of the dichotomy of happiness and unhappiness, if it do not want to fall into the unfortunate sense(2). And from the horizon of the right, I attempt to justify the happiness as a process rather than the means and purpose(3). Furthermore, I try to demonstrate the necessity of happiness theory for the course to get back the lost ego from the boundary of the negative psychology and the positive psychology(4). Finally, I say that the discourse on happiness requires the process towards the outside out of self-pity and self-immersion(5).
    번역하기

    This article is designed to illuminate light and shadow in the discourse on happiness. In this process, I orient the discours of happiness that maximizes freedom and minimizes the violence. To do this, I am first interested in the dialectical relation...

    This article is designed to illuminate light and shadow in the discourse on happiness. In this process, I orient the discours of happiness that maximizes freedom and minimizes the violence. To do this, I am first interested in the dialectical relation between freedom and violence(1). And I talk critically about Epicurus and Aristotle`s position. In this conversation with them, I argue that the theory of happiness get out of the dichotomy of happiness and unhappiness, if it do not want to fall into the unfortunate sense(2). And from the horizon of the right, I attempt to justify the happiness as a process rather than the means and purpose(3). Furthermore, I try to demonstrate the necessity of happiness theory for the course to get back the lost ego from the boundary of the negative psychology and the positive psychology(4). Finally, I say that the discourse on happiness requires the process towards the outside out of self-pity and self-immersion(5).

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼