RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    大學入試의 意味와 그 內的 論理 = Meaninge and Dynamics for College Entrance Exam

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19579155

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines each group's maning system and dynamics for college entrance exam, which distorts Korean education seriously. This issue is investigated through the following guestions:
    1. What is our nominal goal of education?
    2. Which goal is more dominant and more powerful at the real educational setting, human education or competitive education?
    3. How much do people compete for their educational aspiration?
    4. What kind of Koreans' belief system leads Korean eduation to degree competition?
    To explore three research questions, this study uses data from the "Korean peoples' opinion toward education" survey which was done by Jong-Geun Bai and me in 1988. The data were analyzed with loglinear models.
    The present study shows an intereating finding. Opinion-leading-groups, urban·highly educated and middle class groups, wish humanistic education more desperately than their counterparts. However the identical(opinion-leading) groups participate more actively in diploma competition game compared to their counterparts. It is ironical that the same groups wish humanistic education more but contribute to creating competitive education more. Their behaviour seems to be followed by their belief in the myth of meritocracy.
    Besides, this study finds 1) our nominal goal of education is humanistic education rather than competitive education: 2) However, competitive education is realized at the educational setting; 3) most Korean parents are willing to send their children to university and to sacrifice even their economic welfare in order to earn their children's B.A. degree; 4) Korean people's belief in meritocracy seems to drive them to compete desperately at the educational setting.
    Therefore this study concluds that our educational goals are dually structured : humanistic education at the nominal level and competitive education at the actual level. We fing a hopeful fact that people's hehaviour regarding college entrance competition is departed from their wish toward an ideal education. Here we can find a chink where educational policy makers can do something in order to reform problems originated from college entrance competition.
    번역하기

    This study examines each group's maning system and dynamics for college entrance exam, which distorts Korean education seriously. This issue is investigated through the following guestions: 1. What is our nominal goal of education? 2. Which goal is ...

    This study examines each group's maning system and dynamics for college entrance exam, which distorts Korean education seriously. This issue is investigated through the following guestions:
    1. What is our nominal goal of education?
    2. Which goal is more dominant and more powerful at the real educational setting, human education or competitive education?
    3. How much do people compete for their educational aspiration?
    4. What kind of Koreans' belief system leads Korean eduation to degree competition?
    To explore three research questions, this study uses data from the "Korean peoples' opinion toward education" survey which was done by Jong-Geun Bai and me in 1988. The data were analyzed with loglinear models.
    The present study shows an intereating finding. Opinion-leading-groups, urban·highly educated and middle class groups, wish humanistic education more desperately than their counterparts. However the identical(opinion-leading) groups participate more actively in diploma competition game compared to their counterparts. It is ironical that the same groups wish humanistic education more but contribute to creating competitive education more. Their behaviour seems to be followed by their belief in the myth of meritocracy.
    Besides, this study finds 1) our nominal goal of education is humanistic education rather than competitive education: 2) However, competitive education is realized at the educational setting; 3) most Korean parents are willing to send their children to university and to sacrifice even their economic welfare in order to earn their children's B.A. degree; 4) Korean people's belief in meritocracy seems to drive them to compete desperately at the educational setting.
    Therefore this study concluds that our educational goals are dually structured : humanistic education at the nominal level and competitive education at the actual level. We fing a hopeful fact that people's hehaviour regarding college entrance competition is departed from their wish toward an ideal education. Here we can find a chink where educational policy makers can do something in order to reform problems originated from college entrance competition.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 學校敎育現場에서 入試競爭의 意味體系
    • 1. 學生에게 있어서의 意味
    • 2. 學父母에게 주는 意味
    • 3. 敎師에게 주는 意味
    • Ⅱ. 入試로 인한 敎育의 重層構造
    • Ⅰ. 學校敎育現場에서 入試競爭의 意味體系
    • 1. 學生에게 있어서의 意味
    • 2. 學父母에게 주는 意味
    • 3. 敎師에게 주는 意味
    • Ⅱ. 入試로 인한 敎育의 重層構造
    • 1. 硏究質問의 焦點
    • 2. 硏究方法
    • 3. 硏究結果
    • 4. 入試競爭의 現住所
    • Ⅲ. 競爭敎育의 밑바닥에 있는 信念體系
    • 1. 韓國社會의 巨視的 動因
    • 2. 韓國民 속의 微視的 動因
    • Ⅳ. 結 語
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼