RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    상가임대차에서 권리금에 관한 법리의 형성과 과제 = The Formation and Challenges of Legal Principles Regarding the Key Money in Commercial Building Leases

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109906395

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In the case of a commercial building lease, the legal relationship of the key money was formed by the practices of the trading community, and the legal basis began to be established by precedents. In the 1950s and 1960s, the key money was received as a premium in various types of contracts. In the 1970s and 1980s, the key money was subdivided into categories such as the key money for facility rights fees and business operation rights fees, etc., focusing on the legal relationships related to commercial building lease.
    Since the 1990s, specific legal principles on the protection of the key money, such as the protection of the opportunity to recover the key money, have been presented, laying the theoretical foundation for the establishment of new provisions on the key money in the 2015 amendment to the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act(Hereinafter referred to as CBLPA 2015). Additionally, prior to CBLPA 2015, there have been judgments that recognized the obligation to compensate for damages due to tort liability by the landlord and the liability for damages arising from the tenant's breach of contract in transferring the leasehold rights, and recognized these two obligations as joint and several obligations. Such legal principles are believed to be maintainable under the current law, which only stipulates the landlord's liability for Tort, through interpretation.
    It is evaluated that precedents and theories prior to CBLPA 2015 provided the legislative basis for the newly established provisions on the key money. Based on this legislative basis, the legal doctrine on the key money after the amendment of the provisions on the key money began to shift to clarify the interpretation of the new provisions on the key money and the relationship with the relevant provisions of the existing Commercial Building Lease Protection Act. The legal doctrine on the practices of transactions on the key money greatly contributed to the amendment of the provisions on key money through CBLPA 2015. It is necessary to enhance the effectiveness and normativity of the legal relationship on the key money through the amendments to the provisions on the key money by reflecting the numerous precedents and theories on individual issues that have been raised over the past 10 years since the amendment of the provisions on the key money.
    번역하기

    In the case of a commercial building lease, the legal relationship of the key money was formed by the practices of the trading community, and the legal basis began to be established by precedents. In the 1950s and 1960s, the key money was received as ...

    In the case of a commercial building lease, the legal relationship of the key money was formed by the practices of the trading community, and the legal basis began to be established by precedents. In the 1950s and 1960s, the key money was received as a premium in various types of contracts. In the 1970s and 1980s, the key money was subdivided into categories such as the key money for facility rights fees and business operation rights fees, etc., focusing on the legal relationships related to commercial building lease.
    Since the 1990s, specific legal principles on the protection of the key money, such as the protection of the opportunity to recover the key money, have been presented, laying the theoretical foundation for the establishment of new provisions on the key money in the 2015 amendment to the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act(Hereinafter referred to as CBLPA 2015). Additionally, prior to CBLPA 2015, there have been judgments that recognized the obligation to compensate for damages due to tort liability by the landlord and the liability for damages arising from the tenant's breach of contract in transferring the leasehold rights, and recognized these two obligations as joint and several obligations. Such legal principles are believed to be maintainable under the current law, which only stipulates the landlord's liability for Tort, through interpretation.
    It is evaluated that precedents and theories prior to CBLPA 2015 provided the legislative basis for the newly established provisions on the key money. Based on this legislative basis, the legal doctrine on the key money after the amendment of the provisions on the key money began to shift to clarify the interpretation of the new provisions on the key money and the relationship with the relevant provisions of the existing Commercial Building Lease Protection Act. The legal doctrine on the practices of transactions on the key money greatly contributed to the amendment of the provisions on key money through CBLPA 2015. It is necessary to enhance the effectiveness and normativity of the legal relationship on the key money through the amendments to the provisions on the key money by reflecting the numerous precedents and theories on individual issues that have been raised over the past 10 years since the amendment of the provisions on the key money.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼