전략기술 가치동맹 다각화를 위한 인텔리전스체계 구축 연구

국문 초록 (Abstract)

[연구목적]
○ 전략기술분야의 국가별 싱크탱크 간 '인텔리전스협의체' 설계를 통해 전략기술분야의 정부간 협력의 지원체계를 구축하는 방법을 모색

[주요내용]
○ 본 연구는 '인텔리전스협의체'라는 주요 유사입장국(Like-minded Counties)의 전략기술 관련 싱크탱크 중심의 협력플랫폼을 구축방안을 탐색하는 것을 주된 연구의 범위로 함
- 인텔리전스협의체의 개념모델의 설계와 운영방식의 적정성 검토를 중심으로 향후 실제 협의체 운영에 필요한 사항을 제시

[정책대안]
○ 지금까지 연구진은 ‘우리는 물리적 경계를 허무는 글로벌화를 슬로건처럼 외치던 시대를 살았지만 이제는 누가 시스템적 경계를 먼저 허물고 이를 자유롭게 넘나드느냐에 따라 생존이 결정되는 시대를 살고 있다.’ 라는 절박한 관점에서 인텔리전스협의체의 필요성을 고찰하였음
○ 이러한 점에서 인텔리전스협의체는 시스템의 경계를 효과적으로 연계하는 체계로써 최근 세계적 가치동맹 구축 흐름 안에서 매우 중요한 역할을 수행할 것으로 기대
- 이는 신흥안보정책이라는 측면에서 기존의 폐쇄적 기반정보(군사안보적)와 최근의 확대된 필요정보(경제안보적)의 수집, 생산, 관리, 활용 주체가 전환되는 과정에서 확인된 ‘지식체계의 공백(Gaps in Knowledge System)’을 매워줄 핵심적 주체가 될 수 있기 때문임.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Designing Intelligence Network for the CETs Value Alliance

ㆍProject Leader: Jonghwa Choe
ㆍParticipants: Yongrae Cho･Yonggi Kim･Dongwook Seoh･Sunyub Kim･Seona Lee･Dayoung Na

This study explores the evolving trends in regional alliances among like-minded countries, shaped by the U.S. "Indo-Pacific Strategy (2022)," It highlights the emergence of "lattice alliances" and the growing need for policy coordination mechanisms among value-driven nations.

The study emphasizes that in the realm of global scientific and technological innovation, particularly regarding critical and emerging technologies (CETs), collaboration between national policy decision-makers and the policy research institutions supporting them will be essential for sustaining long-term value-based alliances.

To address this, the research team proposed establishing a "Intelligence Network" among like-minded think tanks in CETs field. This initiative aims to facilitate governmental level cooperation through this advisory mechanism. This study examines the process of building the Intelligence Network, its operational strategies, and its effective utilization. The research focuses on ensuring the stable implementation of an intelligence system among relevant think tanks in each strategic technology field. It also investigates methods for identifying collaborative topics and carrying out cooperative activities among participating think tanks. Additionally, the study considers how the expertise and strategic cooperation outcomes derived from these efforts should be shared with key stakeholders and examines the potential ripple effects that such knowledge-sharing could generate.
The study introduces the "Intelligence Network Model" which incorporates several key features. First of all, it defines a hybrid system that combines the benefits of multilateral frameworks with a bilateral structure, ensuring both practical feasibility and the appeal of the advisory group. Furthermore, core stakeholders are divided into two tiers, enabling close collaboration among think tanks while allowing for observer-level participation. This structure mitigated potential interference from external stakeholders.

[Conceptual Model of Intelligence Network]

Note: Written by the research team

Lastly, By aligning the cooperation agenda with the expertise and preferences of participating institutions, the model fosters proactive participation and enhances the practical utilization of outcomes. This approach seeks to create a robust and functional platform for strategic policy coordination and collaboration.

Building on insights from the study, a detailed procedural framework for the Intelligence Network was developed. As shown in the accompanying diagram, the framework consists of two main components; Track 1: Intelligence Dialogue and Cooperation Agenda - regular consultations to facilitate ongoing discussions and strategic alignment, and Track 2: Mini-Project Track – collaborative investigations and analyses conducted by think tanks based on agreed-upon areas of cooperation. This structure ensures a systematic and targeted approach to fostering effective collaboration.

The study highlights the significant role of the Intelligence Dialogue within the emerging global value-driven alliance framework. It is designed to address the "gaps in knowledge systems" that arise during the transition from traditional, closed-source military and security information to broader information needs, encompassing economic and security data. By bridging these gaps, the group aims to enhance knowledge management and utilization, making it a crucial component of this evolving alliance structure.

[Operating Model of Intelligence Network]

Note: Written by the research team

If successfully established, the proposed Intelligence Dialogue could function as an expanded international counterpart to South Korea's Emerging Security Committee (ESC), serving as a global platform for intelligence cooperation. This group would enable participating like-minded countries to identify R&D opportunities, explore collaborative technological fields, and design joint strategies. Positioned at the intersection of government and the private sector, the group is uniquely poised to provide valuable insights into intergovernmental cooperation and the needs of technology and industry, delivering practical and actionable recommendations.

The core advantage of a think tank-led system lies in the openness of academia, which fosters mutually beneficial exchanges and collaborations. This openness is expected to make research collaboration within the Intelligence Dialogue more dynamic, enhancing the group’s overall effectiveness.

Although the proposed Intelligence Dialogue currently focuses on CETs and think tanks, it holds the potential to evolve into a horizontal, multidirectional international cooperation model. Such a model could address the limitations of existing one-way global collaboration systems. In the past, globalization emphasized dismantling physical boundaries, but today’s world requires the ability to overcome systemic boundaries and navigate freely between them. The concept and framework for the Intelligence Dialogue outlined in this study are poised to become a vital "ladder of survival" in this new era.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 국문 요약 i
• 영문 요약 I
• 제1장 서론 1
• 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
• 제2절 연구에서 제안하는 체계의 개념구상 4
• 제3절 연구의 수행방식 5
• 제4절 조사 대상국가 6
• 제2장 주요국의 인텔리전스협의체 현황 분석 8
• 제1절 국내외 전략기술 국가전략 및 국제협력 현황 8
• 1. 한국 8
• 2. 영국 11
• 3. 호주 13
• 4. 캐나다 17
• 5. 일본 19
• 6. 싱가포르 21
• 제2절 주요 인텔리전스협의체 유형 분석 24
• 1. 인텔리전스협의체 모형 구축 24
• 제3장 인텔리전스협의체 설계 방안 검토 및 국가별 참여 의향 조사 32
• 제1절 조사협의를 위한 도구 개발 32
• 1. 인텔리전스협의체 구성을 위한 4대 구성요소 32
• 2. 영문 컨셉노트 및 설문지 개발 39
• 3. 인터뷰 대상기관 간 협의 노트 개발 41
• 4. 데이터 교환체계 제안 42
• 제2절 국가별 참여 의향 조사 43
• 1. 영국 43
• 2. 호주 57
• 3. 캐나다 65
• 4. 일본 77
• 5. 싱가포르 96
• 제4장 인텔리전스협의체 설계방안 제시 112
• 제1절 추진목적 및 설계방향 112
• 제2절 인텔리전스협의체 설계방향 검토 113
• 1. 양자 혹은 다자체제의 적정성 114
• 2. 이해관계자 참여방식과 위상의 적정성 116
• 3. 협력 어젠다의 유형과 참여방식의 적정성 118
• 4. 기술분야 검토방식의 적정성 121
• 5. 인텔리전스협의체 운영방식의 적정성 122
• 6. 성과환류방식의 적정성 126
• 제3절 인텔리전스협의체 모델의 구체화 127
• 제5장 결론 131
• 제1절 주요내용 요약 131
• 제2절 연구의 결론 및 기대효과 133
• 참고문헌 135
• 부 록 141