중국학계의 ‘箕子朝鮮’ 연구와 그 비판에 대한 검토 = Chinese scholars’ perspective of Kijajoseon(箕子朝鮮) research and about the critical discourse analysis

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;Chinese scholars’ perspective of Kijajoseon(箕子朝鮮) research was usually progressed by analysis of vast amount of researches, and through this, we can grasp the point of it’s trend and logical problems.</P><P>&nbsp;&nbsp;On the basis of these previous researches, this paper dealt with Chinese scholar’s books which related with Kija. However, this paper was not attempt to grasp it’s trends, but it&quot;s purpose is distill its contents to introduce to doomestic academic.</P><P>&nbsp;&nbsp;In this purpose, this paper select 8 books about Kija(箕子), and analysis it’s essential points. First is 『箕子與朝鮮論集』, was written by Zhang Bo-quan(張博泉) published in 1994. Second is 『寞氏朝鮮史話』published in 2007, and it’s a popular book. Third is Zhang Bi-bo(張碧波)’s tow books 『東北古族古國古文化硏究』(2000) and 『中國東北疆域硏究』(2006), and he conflict with Zang Bo-quan(張博泉) in several contentious issues related to Kijajoseon(箕子朝鄭) And 『古朝鮮硏究』(2006), was written by Miao Wei(苗威) is the first book about ‘Ancient joseon(古朝鮮)’. And then, is the 『中國東北古民族發展史』published in 2003，and it’s one of the &quot;Northeast Asia Project’. And 『寞子評傳』(2003)，「古今모之寞子記載與硏究綜述」was also examined.</P><P>&nbsp;&nbsp;And last, check the previously announced perspective researches, and pointing out it’s criticism and countermeasures, and suggest some brand new idea about research of Kijajoseon(莫子朝鮮). That is, grasp the facts of the story of ‘Kja(箕子) Moved to the east&quot; and examine the relationship of core and peripheral groups, with these two aspects, we can clearly understood how this story be formed.</P>