RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국 근현대사 과목의 문항 난이도 특성 분석  :  전국 연합학력평가(10월) 채점 결과를 중심으로 = An Analysis of the Characteristics of Item Difficulty in Assessment of Korean Modern and Contemporary History

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82677400

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper attempts to examine a list of factors that account for item difficulty. An analysis has been made on the basis of identifying the characteristics both of difficult items and of easy ones in the National Assessment of Academic Achievement Korean Modern and Contemporary History administered by local education authorities for the last five years.
    The main findings of the analysis of the result can be summarized as follows:
    The following characteristics of the items in question can be attributed to enhancing item difficulty: 1) items that reflected trivial content; 2) items that required extensive prior knowledge of the period in detail; 3) items in which comprehension of lead-in statement played an important role in identifying the correct option; 4) unconventional items that would prevent test-taking skills from having a greater influence on test performance than intended; 5) items whose key words were not explicit both in lead-in statement and in alternatives; 6) familiarity of the phrases used in alternatives; 7) items that include distracters, which are likely to be considered as correct answers.
    On the other hand, the following factors did not appear to be linked with item difficulty: 1) the matter of whether the instruction and alternatives of items reflected contents drawn from more than one unit; 2) the area of items such as interpretation of historical sources and historical imagination; 3) item format such as one correct answer variety, negative variety and combined response variety; 4) the amount of content elements in each alternative.
    번역하기

    This paper attempts to examine a list of factors that account for item difficulty. An analysis has been made on the basis of identifying the characteristics both of difficult items and of easy ones in the National Assessment of Academic Achievement Ko...

    This paper attempts to examine a list of factors that account for item difficulty. An analysis has been made on the basis of identifying the characteristics both of difficult items and of easy ones in the National Assessment of Academic Achievement Korean Modern and Contemporary History administered by local education authorities for the last five years.
    The main findings of the analysis of the result can be summarized as follows:
    The following characteristics of the items in question can be attributed to enhancing item difficulty: 1) items that reflected trivial content; 2) items that required extensive prior knowledge of the period in detail; 3) items in which comprehension of lead-in statement played an important role in identifying the correct option; 4) unconventional items that would prevent test-taking skills from having a greater influence on test performance than intended; 5) items whose key words were not explicit both in lead-in statement and in alternatives; 6) familiarity of the phrases used in alternatives; 7) items that include distracters, which are likely to be considered as correct answers.
    On the other hand, the following factors did not appear to be linked with item difficulty: 1) the matter of whether the instruction and alternatives of items reflected contents drawn from more than one unit; 2) the area of items such as interpretation of historical sources and historical imagination; 3) item format such as one correct answer variety, negative variety and combined response variety; 4) the amount of content elements in each alternative.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서언
    • 2. 난이도에 영향을 주는 변인 도출과 문항 분류
    • 3. 난이도 변인별 분류 방법과 결과
    • 4. 문항 분류 결과에서 나타난 난이도 특성
    • 5. 결어
    • 1. 서언
    • 2. 난이도에 영향을 주는 변인 도출과 문항 분류
    • 3. 난이도 변인별 분류 방법과 결과
    • 4. 문항 분류 결과에서 나타난 난이도 특성
    • 5. 결어
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼