RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      일본의 법과대학원의 현황과 법학교육 -상사법교육을 포함하여- = The Present condition and law education of law school in Japan

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101613359

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Both Korean and Japanese law schools are interested in how to nurture legal talents in accordance with their educational ideas by securing fairness,openness and diversity. As described above, translating the ideas into reality involves difficult problems to be predicted. Only enough discussion of educational contents can explain what the law school is all about.
      As a way of creating environment in which people with excellent and diverse expertise are easily admitted to the law schools, we need to think about opening a night course for those who hope to enter the law schools,or running a long term course for those with full time jobs can attend and complete the course. In addition, employers of those who want to study in the law schools while working should understand and help them because they can acquire legal knowledge and way of thinking in the law schools and then they can perform even better at work.
      Furthermore, in terms of nurturing legal experts with diverse backgrounds,we need to think about ways for those with jobs or university graduates without law degrees to enter the law schools. When we provide curricula,class contents and methods that can help them to achieve appropriate quality and competence to complete the law schools and then, the law schools will be promoted.
      번역하기

      Both Korean and Japanese law schools are interested in how to nurture legal talents in accordance with their educational ideas by securing fairness,openness and diversity. As described above, translating the ideas into reality involves difficult probl...

      Both Korean and Japanese law schools are interested in how to nurture legal talents in accordance with their educational ideas by securing fairness,openness and diversity. As described above, translating the ideas into reality involves difficult problems to be predicted. Only enough discussion of educational contents can explain what the law school is all about.
      As a way of creating environment in which people with excellent and diverse expertise are easily admitted to the law schools, we need to think about opening a night course for those who hope to enter the law schools,or running a long term course for those with full time jobs can attend and complete the course. In addition, employers of those who want to study in the law schools while working should understand and help them because they can acquire legal knowledge and way of thinking in the law schools and then they can perform even better at work.
      Furthermore, in terms of nurturing legal experts with diverse backgrounds,we need to think about ways for those with jobs or university graduates without law degrees to enter the law schools. When we provide curricula,class contents and methods that can help them to achieve appropriate quality and competence to complete the law schools and then, the law schools will be promoted.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 양만식, "최근 일본 회사법의 개정동향-이사의 회사에 대한 책임과 주주대표소송의 개정을 중심으로" 한국기업법학회 19 (19): 55-82, 2005

      2 양만식, "일본 회사법전의 통일화" (56) : 2006

      3 駒田朋子, "読解の協同学習の特長-学習者はどう学んだか-, 日本{語教育実践研究フォーラム報告"

      4 内閣府規制改革会議, "規制改革推進のための3か年計画(再改定) (2009年3月31日閣議決定)"

      5 四宮啓, "臨床法学教育の現状と課題" 58 (58): 2007

      6 中央教育審議会大学分科会法科大学院特別委員会, "法科大学院教育の質の向上のための改善方策について(報告)" 2009

      7 中央教育審議会大学分科会法科大学院特別委員会, "法科大学院教育の質の向上のための改善方策について(中間まとめ)" 2008

      8 伊藤進, "法科大学院の設置と法学部·法学研究科-何が問題なのか" 2005

      9 文部科学省, "法科大学院の組織見直しを促進するための公的支援の見直しについて" 2010

      10 三澤英嗣, "法科大学院の再編" 法学セミナー 2010

      1 양만식, "최근 일본 회사법의 개정동향-이사의 회사에 대한 책임과 주주대표소송의 개정을 중심으로" 한국기업법학회 19 (19): 55-82, 2005

      2 양만식, "일본 회사법전의 통일화" (56) : 2006

      3 駒田朋子, "読解の協同学習の特長-学習者はどう学んだか-, 日本{語教育実践研究フォーラム報告"

      4 内閣府規制改革会議, "規制改革推進のための3か年計画(再改定) (2009年3月31日閣議決定)"

      5 四宮啓, "臨床法学教育の現状と課題" 58 (58): 2007

      6 中央教育審議会大学分科会法科大学院特別委員会, "法科大学院教育の質の向上のための改善方策について(報告)" 2009

      7 中央教育審議会大学分科会法科大学院特別委員会, "法科大学院教育の質の向上のための改善方策について(中間まとめ)" 2008

      8 伊藤進, "法科大学院の設置と法学部·法学研究科-何が問題なのか" 2005

      9 文部科学省, "法科大学院の組織見直しを促進するための公的支援の見直しについて" 2010

      10 三澤英嗣, "法科大学院の再編" 法学セミナー 2010

      11 亀井尚也, "法科大学院における臨床法学教育の意義と課題-実務家の立場から" 79 (79): 2007

      12 中西一裕, "法科大学院における臨床法学教育" (1) : 2006

      13 中央教育審議会大学分科会 法科大学院特別委員会, "法科大学院における組織見直しの促進方策について" 2010

      14 法科大学院(法曹養成制度)の評価に関する研究会, "法科大学院(法曹養成制度)の評価に関する研究会報告書" 2010

      15 宮川成雄, "法曹養成と臨床法学教育" 成文堂 2007

      16 猪口孝, "法学部をどうするか" 2005

      17 日本大學, "法学部の点検·評価結果及び改善意見. in: 日本大学の現況と課題" 2009

      18 松本克美, "日本における法曹養成とクリニック教育-研究者教員の視点から" 79 (79): 2007

      19 日本弁護士連合会, "新しい法曹養成制度の改善方策に関する提言" 2009

      20 戸谷嘉秀, "授業外での学修支援·理想と現実の狭間でー自主ゼミ" (8) : 2007

      21 天野郁夫, "専門職大学院の発足. in: 学術の動向" 2004

      22 文部科学省, "国立大学法人の組織及び業務全般の見直しに関して" 2009

      23 中央教育審議会大学分科会 法科大学院特別委員会, "各法科大学院の改善状況に係る調査結果" 2009

      24 司法制度改革審議會, "ー21世紀の日本を支える司法制度(最終報告書)" 2001

      25 Mark D. West, "アメリカで耳にする法科大学院構想に関する噂の真相" 2004

      26 小野耕二, "わが国における法学部·法学研究科の現状と方向性" 2005

      27 大学審議会 答申, "21世紀の大学像と今後の改革方策について"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-05-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> KOREAN COMMERCIAL LAW ASSOCIATION KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-18 학술지등록 한글명 : 상사법연구
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1 1 1.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.96 0.93 0.979 0.58
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼