RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      한국헌정사를 통한 국무총리제에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Prime Minister System throughout the Whole Span of Constitutional Governments in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104834655

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The simplest way to address the issues relating to the authority of the prime minister by the current constitution would be to revise it. Since, however, the revision of the constitution requires the utmost political considerations that are usually associated with major preconditions and complexity in themselves, it can't be easily brought on the agenda for deliberation. Accordingly, it would be more realistic, as stated in the foregoing, to seek the way forward by making best use of the present prime minister system.One of the ways our prime minister system can pursue to take would be to equip the prime minister with practical authority. The President, for example, should not fail to follow the procedures stipulated by the law in relation to appointment of cabinet members including recommendation by the prime minister. The recommendation of the prime minister should be reflected, at least to some extent, in the final selection of ministers. In this sense, the President could be checked, if not restrained, by the prime minister who controls and coordinates the administration as a whole.The second way to endow the prime minister with more power would be to widen chances for the prime minister to intervene in the personnel administration. As mentioned earlier, the prime minister should be given authority to execute the rights to recommend the appointment and dismissal of cabinet members as legally stipulated. Moreover, the status of the prime minister as chief of public officialdom will be more enhanced when the personnel rights for high ranking officials above the certain grade are delegated to the prime minister.
      번역하기

      The simplest way to address the issues relating to the authority of the prime minister by the current constitution would be to revise it. Since, however, the revision of the constitution requires the utmost political considerations that are usually as...

      The simplest way to address the issues relating to the authority of the prime minister by the current constitution would be to revise it. Since, however, the revision of the constitution requires the utmost political considerations that are usually associated with major preconditions and complexity in themselves, it can't be easily brought on the agenda for deliberation. Accordingly, it would be more realistic, as stated in the foregoing, to seek the way forward by making best use of the present prime minister system.One of the ways our prime minister system can pursue to take would be to equip the prime minister with practical authority. The President, for example, should not fail to follow the procedures stipulated by the law in relation to appointment of cabinet members including recommendation by the prime minister. The recommendation of the prime minister should be reflected, at least to some extent, in the final selection of ministers. In this sense, the President could be checked, if not restrained, by the prime minister who controls and coordinates the administration as a whole.The second way to endow the prime minister with more power would be to widen chances for the prime minister to intervene in the personnel administration. As mentioned earlier, the prime minister should be given authority to execute the rights to recommend the appointment and dismissal of cabinet members as legally stipulated. Moreover, the status of the prime minister as chief of public officialdom will be more enhanced when the personnel rights for high ranking officials above the certain grade are delegated to the prime minister.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-09-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Law Review -> Law Review KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-07-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Law Review -> Korean Law Review KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-05-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 法學硏究 -> 법학연구 KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.02 1.02 1.05
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.07 1.02 1.083 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼