RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      買辦資本論의 再吟味 = The Concept of the Comprador Capital Reconsidered

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2093263

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper tries to understands the conventional theory of the comprador capital and attemps to interpret its conception as "market failure" from the neoclassical view point.
      The main arguments in this paper are as follows:
      First, the conventional critics on the comprador are made on the ground that it hampers the path of self-sustained growth of the developing countries. In this regard, the multinational enterprises in developing countries are condemned as comprador. However, its impact on the development differs from country to country. Therefore, the general argument for its effect cannot be made without refering to the specific situations concerned.
      Secondly, the individual behavior of the comprador on micro level can not be condemned, as far as his economic behavior does not violate the existing law. But, if the behavior of comprador distorts the efficiency in resource allocation as well as the balances growth path of national economy, it must be controlled by the government policy.
      Thirdly, comprador should not be looked upon as an "incurable disease" rooted inherently in the capitalistic system, as P. Baran asserts. It may be rather one aspect of the "market failure" from neoclassical view. In so far as the view point of market failure is accepted, the comprador could be effectively eradicated by the adequate government policy. This will lead us to conclude that if comprador prevails., its responsibility would lie rather in government not in the individual comprador at all in a free market economy.
      Last but not the least, the author is of confidence that the comprador would not be able to find its own place to exist and grow in a present international economic order where the mutual exchange occurs only when one country benefits from the through international trade.
      번역하기

      This paper tries to understands the conventional theory of the comprador capital and attemps to interpret its conception as "market failure" from the neoclassical view point. The main arguments in this paper are as follows: First, the conventiona...

      This paper tries to understands the conventional theory of the comprador capital and attemps to interpret its conception as "market failure" from the neoclassical view point.
      The main arguments in this paper are as follows:
      First, the conventional critics on the comprador are made on the ground that it hampers the path of self-sustained growth of the developing countries. In this regard, the multinational enterprises in developing countries are condemned as comprador. However, its impact on the development differs from country to country. Therefore, the general argument for its effect cannot be made without refering to the specific situations concerned.
      Secondly, the individual behavior of the comprador on micro level can not be condemned, as far as his economic behavior does not violate the existing law. But, if the behavior of comprador distorts the efficiency in resource allocation as well as the balances growth path of national economy, it must be controlled by the government policy.
      Thirdly, comprador should not be looked upon as an "incurable disease" rooted inherently in the capitalistic system, as P. Baran asserts. It may be rather one aspect of the "market failure" from neoclassical view. In so far as the view point of market failure is accepted, the comprador could be effectively eradicated by the adequate government policy. This will lead us to conclude that if comprador prevails., its responsibility would lie rather in government not in the individual comprador at all in a free market economy.
      Last but not the least, the author is of confidence that the comprador would not be able to find its own place to exist and grow in a present international economic order where the mutual exchange occurs only when one country benefits from the through international trade.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 序 言
      • Ⅱ. 買辦의 由來와 槪念
      • Ⅲ. 買辦資本의 性格과 그 形成條件
      • Ⅳ. 多國籍企業과 買辦
      • Ⅴ. 「市場失敗」로서의 買辦
      • Ⅰ. 序 言
      • Ⅱ. 買辦의 由來와 槪念
      • Ⅲ. 買辦資本의 性格과 그 形成條件
      • Ⅳ. 多國籍企業과 買辦
      • Ⅴ. 「市場失敗」로서의 買辦
      • Ⅵ. 結 言
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼