Governing Care Provision: A Comparative Perspective on Japan and Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper examines the relationship between the state and the community with regard to care provision in Japan and South Korea. Japan and Korea took similar institutional trajectories at different points in time, but how care provision was organized varied depending on the context of the development of the care labor market and community organizations. This paper compares provision of care for elderly people in Japan and Korea with a focus on community-based organizations. First, we compare demographic changes and public responses to care provision for elderly people by the respective governments. Second, we analyze the important juncture of policy changes on care provision in terms of the care regime. Finally, we examine the experience of community-based organizations in the changing care regime, based on interviews with managers of community-based organizations, and we discuss the potential tensions between state and community with regard to care provision.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 World Bank, "World Development Indicators"

2 Chung, M. K, "Viability and problem of the quasi-market delivery system in long-term care insurance: Lessons from the Korean and Japanese cases" 2008

3 Evers, A, "The Third Sector in Europe" Edward Elgar 2004

4 Kim, H, "The Study on the Co-production of Community Based Care Service" 2016

5 Hashimoto, S, "The Provision of Care Services for Elderly People by the Co-operative Sector in Japan" EMES International Research Network 2015

6 Peng, I, "The Political and Social Economy of Care in the Republic of Korea" United Nations Research Institute for Social Development 2009

7 Razavi, Shahra, "The Political and Social Economy of Care in a Development Context: Conceptual Issues, Research Questions and Policy Options" United Nations Research Institute for Social Development 2007

8 Hayashi, M, "The Japanese voluntary sector’s responses to the increasing unmet demand for home care from an ageing population" 36 : 508-533, 2016

9 Kofman, E, "The Implications of Migration for Gender and Care Regimes in the South" United Nations Research Institute for Social Development 2009

10 Jette, C, "Social economy and home care services in Quebec: Co-production or co-construction?" 22 : 48-69, 2011

11 Kurimoto, A, "Social Innovation in Co-operative Elderly Care in Japan" 2016

12 Hashimoto, S, "Revision of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act and new movement of mutual assistance activities by local citizens: Rethinking the meaning of citizen-led welfare organizations" 48 (48): 25-60, 2016

13 The Society for the Study of Integrated Community Care, "Research report on the theory of the system in order to build the integrated community care system" 2014

14 Hayashi, M, "Japan’s Fureai Kippu time-banking in elderly care: Origins, development, challenges and impact" 16A : 30-44, 2012

15 Hwang, D, "In-depth Case Study of Social Enterprise by Patterns" Korea Labor Institute 2014

16 Esping-Andersen, G, "Hybrid or Unique? The Japanese Welfare State Between Europe and American" 7 (7): 179-189, 1997

17 Lee, H, "Gendered Migration in a Changing Care Regime: A case of Chinese Korean Migrants in South Korea" 2017

18 Ascoli, U, "Dilemmas of the Welfare Mix: The New Structure of Welfare in an Era of Privatization" Springer 2002

19 Kim, E, "Cross National Comparison on the Changing Patterns of the LTCI Service Providers" 2013

20 Etxezarreta, E, "Changes in the Welfare State and Their Impact on the Social Economy: Contributions to the Theoretical Debate from a Systemic and Comparative Approach" 83 : 259-280, 2012

21 Ochiai, E, "Care Diamonds and Welfare Regimes in East and South-East Asian Societies: Bridging Family and Welfare Sociology" 18 (18): 60-78, 2009

22 Pestoff, V. A, "Beyond the Market and State: Social Enterprises and Civil Democracy in a Welfare Society" Ashgate 1998

23 Kwon, H, "Beyond European Welfare Regimes: Comparative Perspectives on East Asian Welfare Systems" 26 : 467-484, 1997