RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      병원사업에 있어서 “필수유지업무”에 관한 법리적 검토

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82509212

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper is to discuss essential business of hospital business. While the labor world and ILO made continuous recommendation for improvements towards the compulsory arbitration system along with the controversy over unconstitutionality of the system, the Constitutional Court ruled that the system is constitutional on December 23, 1996(90hunba19) and on May 15, 2003 (2001hunga31). Despite this decision from the Constitutional Court, there has been much controversy over whether the compulsory arbitration system infringes the rights of collective action against the principle of trade union & labor relations adjustment which allows Commissioner of the Labor Relations Commission to decide on submission of arbitration by virtue of his/her authority in case where industrial disputes take place in the essential public-service businesses. The revision on the above provision was closely examined from the year 2003 and an agreement was made on the abolition of the compulsory arbitration system and the introduction of essential business with a grand compromise among labor unions, employers and the government on September 11, 2006 followed by revision(Essential business system enacted on January 1, 2008) of the Trade Union & Labor Relations Adjustment Act on December 30 in the same year. Accordingly, in order to perform the essential business, parties to labor relations must have an agreement or obtain a decision by the Labor Relations Commission before taking industrial actions. This paper firstly examined the concept of essential public-service businesses and essential business, legal meaning of essential business, procedures for making agreement and decision and legal effects. Secondly it intensively explored a theory against the principle of the legality which was raised from some part of society. In other words, it is claimed that a theory against the principle of the legality is not consistent with the rule of legislation and some abstract wording is against void for vagueness doctrine because part of crime constitution requirements is delegated to the Presidential Decree or to consultation among parties to labor relations. But analysis on the rule of legislation and void for vagueness doctrine reflected in the decision by the Constitutional Court led that argument for a theory against the principle of the legality is not reasonable. Close examination was done on a formal act of essential business agreement and necessity of prior agreement before submission of decision to the Labor Relations Commission which might have difficulties in performing work. In addition, an example agreement on hospital essential business is attached to help you understand this paper better.
      번역하기

      This paper is to discuss essential business of hospital business. While the labor world and ILO made continuous recommendation for improvements towards the compulsory arbitration system along with the controversy over unconstitutionality of the system...

      This paper is to discuss essential business of hospital business. While the labor world and ILO made continuous recommendation for improvements towards the compulsory arbitration system along with the controversy over unconstitutionality of the system, the Constitutional Court ruled that the system is constitutional on December 23, 1996(90hunba19) and on May 15, 2003 (2001hunga31). Despite this decision from the Constitutional Court, there has been much controversy over whether the compulsory arbitration system infringes the rights of collective action against the principle of trade union & labor relations adjustment which allows Commissioner of the Labor Relations Commission to decide on submission of arbitration by virtue of his/her authority in case where industrial disputes take place in the essential public-service businesses. The revision on the above provision was closely examined from the year 2003 and an agreement was made on the abolition of the compulsory arbitration system and the introduction of essential business with a grand compromise among labor unions, employers and the government on September 11, 2006 followed by revision(Essential business system enacted on January 1, 2008) of the Trade Union & Labor Relations Adjustment Act on December 30 in the same year. Accordingly, in order to perform the essential business, parties to labor relations must have an agreement or obtain a decision by the Labor Relations Commission before taking industrial actions. This paper firstly examined the concept of essential public-service businesses and essential business, legal meaning of essential business, procedures for making agreement and decision and legal effects. Secondly it intensively explored a theory against the principle of the legality which was raised from some part of society. In other words, it is claimed that a theory against the principle of the legality is not consistent with the rule of legislation and some abstract wording is against void for vagueness doctrine because part of crime constitution requirements is delegated to the Presidential Decree or to consultation among parties to labor relations. But analysis on the rule of legislation and void for vagueness doctrine reflected in the decision by the Constitutional Court led that argument for a theory against the principle of the legality is not reasonable. Close examination was done on a formal act of essential business agreement and necessity of prior agreement before submission of decision to the Labor Relations Commission which might have difficulties in performing work. In addition, an example agreement on hospital essential business is attached to help you understand this paper better.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론
      • II. 필수공익사업 및 필수유지업무의 개념
      • 1. 필수공익사업의 개념
      • 2. 필수유지업무의 개념
      • III. “필수유지업무”의 법적 의미
      • I. 서론
      • II. 필수공익사업 및 필수유지업무의 개념
      • 1. 필수공익사업의 개념
      • 2. 필수유지업무의 개념
      • III. “필수유지업무”의 법적 의미
      • 1. 쟁의행위 기간 중 필수유지업무의 유지 강제
      • 2. 대체근로 허용
      • IV. 필수유지업무 협정 체결 또는 결정 절차 및 불복방법
      • 1. 필수유지업무 협정 체결 또는 결정 절차
      • 2. 법적 효과
      • V. 죄형법정주의 위반론에 대한 검토
      • 1. 논의 배경
      • 2. 죄형법정주의 위반론의 요지
      • 3. 죄형법정주의 위반론에 대한 검토
      • VI. 병원사업 실무상 쟁점 및 해결방안
      • 1. 필수유지업무협정의 요식행위성
      • 2. 노동위원회에 결정신청전 사전협의 필요성
      • 3. 동일병원 내 의료인력 이동배치 가능성
      • 4. 인근 지역병원 간의 지역대체 가능성
      • 5. 중환자의 개념
      • [별첨 1] 직권중재 제도와 필수유지 업무제도
      • [별첨 2] 필수유지업무 협정서
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이형국, "형법총론, 제4판" 법문사 2005

      2 신동운, "형법총론, 제3판" 법문사 2008

      3 "헌법재판소 판례집"

      4 "헌법재판소 판례집"

      5 "헌법재판소 판례집"

      6 "헌법재판소 판례집"

      7 허 영, "한국헌법론, 제3판" 박영사 2005

      8 이준희, "필수유지업무제도에 대한 법리 검토" 한국노동연구원 8 (8): 83-113, 2008

      9 노동부, "필수유지업무제도 운영 매뉴얼"

      10 장홍근, "필수유지업무제도 도입과 쟁점" 한국노동연구원 2008

      1 이형국, "형법총론, 제4판" 법문사 2005

      2 신동운, "형법총론, 제3판" 법문사 2008

      3 "헌법재판소 판례집"

      4 "헌법재판소 판례집"

      5 "헌법재판소 판례집"

      6 "헌법재판소 판례집"

      7 허 영, "한국헌법론, 제3판" 박영사 2005

      8 이준희, "필수유지업무제도에 대한 법리 검토" 한국노동연구원 8 (8): 83-113, 2008

      9 노동부, "필수유지업무제도 운영 매뉴얼"

      10 장홍근, "필수유지업무제도 도입과 쟁점" 한국노동연구원 2008

      11 박제성, "필수공익사업의 쟁의행위에 대한 새로운 규율무와 대체근로" 한국노동연구원 7 (7): 145-168, 2007

      12 문무기, "파업시 최소서비스 유지의무: 파업권과 공익의 조화" 한국노동연구원 3 (3): 2005

      13 문무기, "파업시 유지되는 필수유지업무의 범위와 관련조항의 법리적 해석" 한국노동법학회 (25) : 15-38, 2007

      14 한국노동연구원, "주요노동동향" 2008

      15 대한병원협회, "쟁의행위시 중환자보호 어떻게 할 것인가?" 2008

      16 허일태, "자백거부와 선고유예 및 ‘개전의 정상’에 관한 상고심의 대상 여부" 박영사 11 : 2003

      17 유성재, "노사관계 선진화 입법에 대한 법리적 검토" 법학연구원 31 (31): 361-392, 2007

      18 김형배, "노동법" 박영사 2007

      19 "http://seoulnambu.molab.go.kr"

      20 "http://likms.assembly.go.kr"

      21 "http://library.ccourt.go.kr/"

      22 "http://epic.kdi.re.kr"

      23 "http://bogun.nodong.org"

      24 문무기, "2007 노동법의 쟁점(1)" 한국노동연구원 2008

      25 문무기, "2006 노동법의 쟁점 in: 파업시 유지되어야 할 필수업무의 범위"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.76 0.76 0.66
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.72 0.6 0.878 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼