RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    창작 국악관현악의 총보 기보법 연구 = The Study on the Notation for Modern Korean Orchestra

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60040716

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    These days, contemporary Modern Korean traditional orchestra music, as the prominent genre of contemporary Modern Korean traditional music, has a variety of works being performed. The history of contemporary Modern Korean traditional orchestra music began in 1939 with composer Ki-su Kim and culminated with the renaissance of the 1980s which produced a number of works by composers such as Hui-jo Kim, Beom-hoon Park, In Pyung Chun and Dae Woong Baek. Nevertheless, insufficient research has been carried out on the traditional methods of traditional Korean orchestral music especially with a focus on its most important contemporary version. Also there exists no notable achievement in research on notation with regard to the full score of contemporary Korean traditional orchestral music. This is because the notation for the full score of contemporary Modern Korean traditional orchestra music has been regarded as a task that does not require special knowledge or skills and an insignificant step in wrapping up a work of orchestra music. As is often the case, even well-organized orchestra music by a composer runs into mistakes in performance due to errors in notation of the full score or partial score or crude notation. Hence, this study examines the existing notation of full scores of contemporary Modern Korean traditional orchestra music to identify and discuss its issues in order to make some proposals. As Western music was introduced to Korea, contemporary Modern Korean traditional orchestra music, as part of contemporary Modern Korean traditional music has developed in the order of ensemble, concerto, chorale and Asian orchestra. With the emergence of the conductor playing the part that was performed by Jib-bak-ag-sa in a traditional Korean orchestra, and in order to cover a large-scale ensemble, the music notation for Modern Korean traditional orchestra music that appeared in 1930 adopting the full score with five-line staff. The full score notation has developed through small and gradual changes. Instruments were arranged on the full score in the order of wind, percussion and string, reflecting the early method of Western orchestral music and considering the particular characteristic of Korean traditional musical instruments. Currently, full score notation mostly adopts the arrangement in the order of wind, string and percussion, but it often varies depending on composers or with individual works in response to specific compositional traits or the inclusion of some special instruments. The lack of a uniform notation style seems to be a critical issue, for it can cause confusion with the conductor or the performer. Furthermore, it may disturb the fundamental harmonic composition in organizing an orchestra. An alternative, in case a special instrument joins in, would consist in basically adopting the arrangement of instruments for notation in the order of wind, string and percussion while determining the position of the group according to classification of musical instruments. Second, in instrument range notation, if special instruments like Geomungo and Daeajaeng sound one octave lower than they are written, an 8 should be inscribed underneath the clef in order to avoid confusion. Most important, efforts should be made to achieve a precise notation of details with a view to absolutely clear communication of the composer`s intention. Composers, who understand the importance of music notation better than anyone else, must not forget that only when they can achieve a clear expression by minimizing ambiguities on full score notation so they can create the best possible performance.
    번역하기

    These days, contemporary Modern Korean traditional orchestra music, as the prominent genre of contemporary Modern Korean traditional music, has a variety of works being performed. The history of contemporary Modern Korean traditional orchestra music b...

    These days, contemporary Modern Korean traditional orchestra music, as the prominent genre of contemporary Modern Korean traditional music, has a variety of works being performed. The history of contemporary Modern Korean traditional orchestra music began in 1939 with composer Ki-su Kim and culminated with the renaissance of the 1980s which produced a number of works by composers such as Hui-jo Kim, Beom-hoon Park, In Pyung Chun and Dae Woong Baek. Nevertheless, insufficient research has been carried out on the traditional methods of traditional Korean orchestral music especially with a focus on its most important contemporary version. Also there exists no notable achievement in research on notation with regard to the full score of contemporary Korean traditional orchestral music. This is because the notation for the full score of contemporary Modern Korean traditional orchestra music has been regarded as a task that does not require special knowledge or skills and an insignificant step in wrapping up a work of orchestra music. As is often the case, even well-organized orchestra music by a composer runs into mistakes in performance due to errors in notation of the full score or partial score or crude notation. Hence, this study examines the existing notation of full scores of contemporary Modern Korean traditional orchestra music to identify and discuss its issues in order to make some proposals. As Western music was introduced to Korea, contemporary Modern Korean traditional orchestra music, as part of contemporary Modern Korean traditional music has developed in the order of ensemble, concerto, chorale and Asian orchestra. With the emergence of the conductor playing the part that was performed by Jib-bak-ag-sa in a traditional Korean orchestra, and in order to cover a large-scale ensemble, the music notation for Modern Korean traditional orchestra music that appeared in 1930 adopting the full score with five-line staff. The full score notation has developed through small and gradual changes. Instruments were arranged on the full score in the order of wind, percussion and string, reflecting the early method of Western orchestral music and considering the particular characteristic of Korean traditional musical instruments. Currently, full score notation mostly adopts the arrangement in the order of wind, string and percussion, but it often varies depending on composers or with individual works in response to specific compositional traits or the inclusion of some special instruments. The lack of a uniform notation style seems to be a critical issue, for it can cause confusion with the conductor or the performer. Furthermore, it may disturb the fundamental harmonic composition in organizing an orchestra. An alternative, in case a special instrument joins in, would consist in basically adopting the arrangement of instruments for notation in the order of wind, string and percussion while determining the position of the group according to classification of musical instruments. Second, in instrument range notation, if special instruments like Geomungo and Daeajaeng sound one octave lower than they are written, an 8 should be inscribed underneath the clef in order to avoid confusion. Most important, efforts should be made to achieve a precise notation of details with a view to absolutely clear communication of the composer`s intention. Composers, who understand the importance of music notation better than anyone else, must not forget that only when they can achieve a clear expression by minimizing ambiguities on full score notation so they can create the best possible performance.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼