메시지 프레이밍과 제품 유형 및 시간적 거리감이 소비자 태도에 미치는 영향 = Effects of Message Framing, Product Type, and Temporal Distance on Consumer Attitude

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study attempts to examine effects of message frame direction on consumer attitudes for general consumer products. More specifically the study examines if gains-based message and losses-based message have differential influences on consumer attitudes. Also, the study examines effects of product type(new vs existing product) and temporal distance(near future vs distant future) as moderating variables of message framing. The study manipulates message framing direction(positive vs negative direction), product type (new vs existing product) and temporal distance(near future vs distant future) in an experiment. All three factors are treated as between-subjects factors and eight experimental conditions are created by combining the three factors(2x2x2). Major findings of the study can be summarized as follows. First, main effect of message framing direction and interaction effects of message framing direction by product type and message framing direction by temporal distance are significant in influencing consumer attitudes. Second, a positive message framing as opposed to a negative framing had more favorable influence for an existing product, however no significant difference was found for a new product. Third, a positive message framing as opposed to a negative framing had more favorable influence for purchasing in the distant future, however no significant difference was found for purchasing in the near future. Finally, the three way interaction of message framing direction, product type and temporal distance is not significant on consumer attitudes. The results of this study implicate that in general marketers are recommended to use a positive framing, especially when developing communication messages for existing products and for consumers who will buy in the distant future. The study has some limitations including rather small effect sizes, use of only one product as an experimental stimulus, and use of only one year later as a distant future. Future research directions are suggested to deal with the limitations.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 여준상, "혁신적 신제품에 대한 소비자반응에 있어 심적 시뮬레이션 영향 연구" 한국마케팅학회 25 (25): 25-47, 2010

2 이유재, "지각된 불확실성이 프레이밍 효과에 미치는 영향: 손실 영역을 중심으로" 한국경영학회 39 (39): 939-962, 2010

3 신현정, "제품 특성과 소비자 특성에 따른 광고의 프레이밍 효과(Framing Effects)에 대한 연구 : 쾌락적 vs. 실용적 제품과 소비자의 제품지식수준을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2006

4 조재운, "사전지식과 메시지 프레이밍이 소비자 의사결정에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 16 (16): 1-15, 2001

5 조형오, "비만예방 광고의 메시지 유형별 설득효과 차이분석" 11 (11): 165-185, 2000

6 송인학, "메시지의 긍정ㆍ부정 프레이밍과 시간 프레임에 따른 광고 효과" 사회과학연구소 20 (20): 129-150, 2009

7 김완석, "광고태도가 상표태도 형성에 영향을미치는과정에대한상표친숙도의영향" 34 : 31-49, 1997

8 김광수, "광고에서의 프레이밍 효과 : 예상 이론을 중심으로" 9 (9): 193-212, 1998

9 Babin, B. J., "Work and/or fun : measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value" 20 (20): 644-656, 1994

10 Cooper, R. G., "Winning at New Products:Accelerating the Process fromIdea to Launch" Addison-Wesley 1993

11 Chandran, S., "When a day means more than a year : Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk" 31 (31): 375-389, 2004

12 Levin, ED., "Transdermal nicotine effects on attention" 140 (140): 135-141, 1998

13 Nira, L., "The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions : A test of temporal construal theory" 75 (75): 5-18, 1998

14 Das, T. K., "The riskbased view of trust : A conceptual framework" 19 (19): 85-116, 2004

15 O'Keefea, D. J., "The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed lossframed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors : A meta-analytic review" 12 (12): 623-644, 2006

16 Robertson, T. S., "The process of innovation and the diffusion of innovation" 31 (31): 14-19, 1967

17 Campbell, M. C., "The moderating effect of perceived risk on consumers’evaluations of product incongruity : Preference for the norm" 28 (28): 439-449, 2006

18 Maheswaran, D., "The influence of message framing and issue in volvement" 27 (27): 61-367, 1990

19 Simonson, I., "The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions" 19 (19): 105-118, 1992

20 Tversky, A., "The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science" 211 (211): 453-458, 1981

21 Holbrook, M. B., "The experiential aspects of consumption : Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun" 9 (9): 132-140, 1982

22 Kollock, P., "The emergence of exchange structures : An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust" 100 (100): 313-346, 1994

23 Libermana, N., "The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal" 38 (38): 523-534, 2002

24 Meyerowitz, B. E., "The effect of message framing on breast selfexamination attitudes, intentions, and behavior" 52 (52): 500-510, 1987

25 Rothman, A. J., "The Influence of Message Framing on Intentions to Perform Health Behaviors" 29 (29): 408-433, 1993

26 Trope, Y., "Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference" 79 (79): 876-889, 2000

27 Trope, Y., "Temporal construal" 110 (110): 403-421, 2003

28 Aaker, D. A., "Strategic Market Management, 4th ed" John Wiley & Sons, Inc 244-249, 1995

29 Samuelson, W., "Status quo bias in decision making" 1 (1): 7-59, 1988

30 Schwarz, N., "Social psychology:Handbook of Basic Principles" 385-407, 1996

31 Rothman, A. J., "Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior : the role of message framing" 121 (121): 3-19, 1997

32 Haim, M., "Risk-taking, framing effects, and affect" 57 (57): 38-58, 1994

33 Bell, D. E., "Regret in decision making under uncertainty" 30 (30): 961-981, 1982

34 Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed" McGraw-Hill 1978

35 Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric Theory, 1st ed" McGraw-Hill 1967

36 Murphy, K. R., "Psychological Testing: Principles and Applications" Prentice-Hall 1988

37 Kahneman, D., "Prospect theory : An analysis of decision under risk" 47 (47): 263-292, 1979

38 Ail, A., "Product innovativeness and entry strategy : Impact on cycle time and break‐even time" 12 (12): 54-69, 1995

39 Fedral Trade Commission, "Permissible Period of Time DuringWhich New Product"

40 Ritov, I., "Outcome knowledge, regret, and omission bias" 64 (64): 119-127, 1995

41 Booz, "New Product Management for the 1980's" Booz, Allen and Hamilton, Inc 1982

42 Hair, J. F. Jr., "MultivariateDataAnalysis, 5th ed" Prentice Hall 1998

43 Wegener, D. T., "Mood management across affective states : The hedonic contingency hypothesis" 66 (66): 1034-1048, 1994

44 Arora, R., "Message framing strategies for new and mature products" 16 (16): 377-385, 2007

45 Smith, S. M., "Message framing and persuasion : A message processing analysis" 22 (22): 257-268, 1996

46 Ganzach, Y., "Message framing and buying behavior : A field experiment" 32 (32): 11-17, 1995

47 Batra, R., "Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes" 2 (2): 159-170, 1990

48 Robinson, J. P., "Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes" Academic Press 1991

49 Tversky, A., "Loss aversion in riskless choice : A reference-dependent model" 106 (106): 1039-1061, 1991

50 Areni, C. S., "Language power and persuasion" 22 (22): 507-525, 2005

51 Chaiken, S., "InUnintended Thought" Guilford Press 212-252, 1989

52 Avnet, T., "How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions" (February) : 1-10, 2006

53 Gatignon, H., "Handbook of Consumer Behavior" Prentice-Hall 1991

54 Rochford, L., "Generating and screening new products ideas" 20 (20): 287-296, 1991

55 Wood, S. L., "From fear to loathing? How emotion influences the evaluation and early use of innovations" 70 (70): 44-57, 2006

56 Smith, G. E., "Framing in advertising and the moderating impact of consumer education" 9 : 49-64, 1996

57 Jain, S. P., "For better or for worse? Valenced comparative frames and regulatory focus" 34 (34): 57-65, 2007

58 Gourville, J. T., "Eager sellers stony buyers:Understanding the psychology of new-product adoption" (June) : 99-106, 2006

59 Veryzer, R. W. Jr., "Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process" 15 (15): 304-321, 1998

60 Lim, N., "Consumers' perceived risk: sources versus consequences" 2 (2): 216-228, 2003

61 Manning, K. C., "Consumer Innovativeness and the Adoption Process" 4 (4): 329-345, 1995

62 Hoyer, W. D., "Consumer Behavior, 6th ed" South-Western 2013

63 Blackwell, R. D., "Consumer Behavior, 4th ed" Thomson South-Western 2006

64 Trope, Y., "Construal levels and psychological distance : Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior" 17 (17): 83-95, 2007

65 Rosch, E., "Cognition and Categorization" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1978

66 Kanouse, D. E., "Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior" General Learning Press 1972

67 Fiske, S. T., "Attention and weight in person perception : The impact of negative and extreme behavior" 38 (38): 889-906, 1980

68 Haim, M., "Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience : evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction" 20 (20): 451-466, 1993

69 Popielarz, D., "An exploration of perceived risk and willingness to try new products" 4 (4): 368-372, 1967

70 Mizerski, R. W., "An attribution explanation of the disproportionate influence of unfavorable information" 9 (9): 301-310, 1982

71 Levina, I. P., "All frames are not created equal : A typology and critical analysis of framing effects" 76 (76): 149-188, 1998

72 Keller, P. A., "Affect, framing, and persuasion" 40 (40): 54-64, 2003

73 Tversky, A., "Advances in prospect theory : Cumulative representation of uncertainty" 5 (5): 297-323, 1992

74 Kanouse, D. E., "Advances in Consumer Research, 11, eds" Association for Consumer Research 703-708, 1984

75 Dowling, G. R., "A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity" 21 (21): 119-134, 1992

76 Garcia, R., "A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology : a literature review" 19 (19): 110-132, 2002