Low-shrinking composites. Are they reliable for bonding orthodontic retainers?

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS), fracture mode, wire pull out (WPO) resistance and microleakage between low-shrinking and conventional composites used as a lingual retainer adhesive. Methods: A total of 120 human mandibular incisor teeth, extracted for periodontal reasons, were collected. Sixty of them were separated into two groups. To determine the SBS, either Transbond-LR (3M-Unitek) or Silorane (3M-Espe) was applied to the lingual surface of the teeth by packing the material into standard cylindrical plastic matrices (Ultradent) to simulate the lingual retainer bonding area. To test WPO resistance, 20 samples were prepared for each composite where the wire was embedded in the composite materialand cured. Then tensile stress was applied until failure of the composite occurred. The remaining 60 teeth were divided into two groups and multi-stranded 0.0215-inch diameter wire was bonded with the same composites. Microleakage was evaluated by the dye penetration method. Statistical analyses were performed by Wilcoxon, Pearson chi-square, and Mann-Whitney-U tests at p ＜ 0.05 level. Results: The SBS and WPO results were not statistically significant between the two groups. Significant differences were found between the groups in terms of fracture mode (p ＜ 0.001). Greater percentages of the fractures showed mix type failure (85%) for Silorane and adhesive (60%) for Transbond-LR. Microleakage values were lower in low-shrinking composite than the control and this difference was found to be statistically significant (p ＜ 0.001). Conclusions: Low-shrinking composite produced sufficient SBS, WPO and microleakage values on the etched enamel surfaces, when used as a lingual retainer composite. (Korean J Orthod 2011;41(1):51-58)

목차 (Table of Contents)

• INTRODUCTION
• MATERIAL AND METHODS
• RESULTS
• DISCUSSION
• CONCLUSIONS
• REFERENCES

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Taylor MJ, 20 : 3-10, 1992

2 Guggenberger R, "Weinmann W. Exploring beyond methacrylates" 13 : 82D-84D, 2000

3 Oliver RG, "The effect of different methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive" 93 : 196-200, 1988

4 Weinmann W, "Siloranes in dental composites" 21 : 68-74, 2005

5 Lutz F, "Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations" 7 : 107-113, 1991

6 Eick JD, "Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity" 17 : 103-111, 1986

7 Ogaard B, "Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization part 1. Lesion development" 94 : 68-73, 1988

8 Ulker M, "Microleakage under orthodontic brackets using high-intensity curing lights" 79 : 144-149, 2009

9 Uysal T, "Microleakage under metallic and ceramic brackets bonded with orthodontic self-etching primer systems" 78 : 1089-1094, 2008

10 Uysal T, "Microleakage between composite/wire and composite/enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 1: a comparison of three composites" 31 : 647-651, 2009

11 Uysal T, "Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 2: comparison of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing adhesive with conventional lingual retainer composite" 31 : 652-657, 2009

12 Thalacker C, "Marginal integrity of class V silorane and methacrylate composite restorations" 83 : A1364-, 2004

13 Irie M, "Marginal gap formation of light-activated restorative materials: effects of immediate setting shrinkage and bond strength" 18 : 203-210, 2002

14 Palin WM, "In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites" 21 : 324-335, 2005

15 Gillgrass TJ, "Fluoride release, microbial inhibition and microleakage pattern of two orthodontic band cements" 27 : 455-461, 1999

16 O’Reilly MM, "Featherstone JD. Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study" 92 : 33-40, 1987

17 Oesterle LJ, "Enhancing wire-composite bond strength of bonded retainers with wire surface treatment" 119 : 625-631, 2001

18 James JW, "Effects of high-speed curing devices on shear bond strength and microleakage of orthodontic brackets" 123 : 555-561, 2003

19 Baysal A, "Effects of high-intensity curing lights on microleakage under bonded lingual retainers" 78 : 1084-1088, 2008

20 Uysal T, "Different lingual retainer composites and the microleakage between enamel-composite and wire-composite interfaces" 78 : 941-946, 2008

21 Alani AH, "Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review" 22 : 173-185, 1997

22 Breschi L, "Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface" 24 : 90-101, 2008

23 Gladwin MA, "Clinical aspects of dental materials: theory, practice, and cases" Philadelphia, Pa.: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 47-57, 2004

24 Artun J, "Caries and periodontal reactions associated with long-term use of different types of bonded lingual retainers" 86 : 112-118, 1984

25 Hilton TJ, "Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2" 15 : 279-289, 2002

26 Hilton TJ, "Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1" 15 : 198-210, 2002

27 Bearn DR, "Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire-composite interface" 111 : 67-74, 1997

28 Bearn DR, "Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review" 108 : 207-213, 1995

29 Ramoglu SI, "Accelerated aging effects on surface hardness and roughness of lingual retainer adhesives" 78 : 140-144, 2008

30 Reynolds IR, "A review of direct orthodontic bonding" 2 : 171-178, 1975

31 De Munck J, "A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results" 84 : 118-132, 2005