RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    스토킹범죄 피해자 보호에 관한 연구 - 스토킹범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 법률의 개정(안)을 중심으로 - = Study on protection of stalking victims - focusing on amendment of punishment act of stalking crime -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108206292

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Stalking punishment act states stalking as an act to incur anxiety or fear in victim consistently or repeatedly without just reason against the stalkee’s will. Previously, such act has been assumed as an excessive expression of affection or wooing onto the other person as stated in a proverb ‘tens of strikes will tumble any tree’. However as it has become a social notion that mental and physical suffering afflicted by staling is as serious as that by criminal act, social demand to regulate it as crime has arisen.
    In Korea, from 1999 to 2021 when stalking punishment act has been enacted, stalking-related legislations have been proposed over 20 times, but such legislation has not been proceeded for over 20 years.
    As stalking prevention act, legislated in 2021 which is late compared to other countries like Germany or Japan, has been enacted for over a year, it requires many revisions as 15 revision proposals have been submitted to the congress.
    In this study, it has analyzed preceding research, revisions, and legislation of other countries to study major issues in current stalking punishment act and deduced its revisions.
    Issues with the current stalking punishment act include; the subject of stalking crime is limited to the victim and his/her family; second, the law can penalize the criminal only when the act itself is committed; third, there is limitation of crime not prosecuted against objection; fourth, online stalking is difficult to be punished despite the public legal demand; fifth, it is meager the regulation to report the stalkee in modifying emergency measure defined by the law; sixth, more powerful measures against the perpetrator is necessary. Such issue can argue that related content is insufficient in the regards that the law protects stalking victim and prevents stalking developing into violent crime with preemptive measure, which its prime legislative motive.
    Therefore, purpose of this study is to deduce a revision to improve insufficient aspects in protection of stalking victim. In this study, preceding studies, domestic legislations, and stalking-related regulations in Japan and Germany have been studied chronologically to derive such revision, and thus, its primary goal is to study overall legal system on stalking crime and changes in public perception, and solve issues of current legislation. Its second goal is to propose measures to adequately respond to possible stalking-related issues in Korea.
    번역하기

    Stalking punishment act states stalking as an act to incur anxiety or fear in victim consistently or repeatedly without just reason against the stalkee’s will. Previously, such act has been assumed as an excessive expression of affection or wooing o...

    Stalking punishment act states stalking as an act to incur anxiety or fear in victim consistently or repeatedly without just reason against the stalkee’s will. Previously, such act has been assumed as an excessive expression of affection or wooing onto the other person as stated in a proverb ‘tens of strikes will tumble any tree’. However as it has become a social notion that mental and physical suffering afflicted by staling is as serious as that by criminal act, social demand to regulate it as crime has arisen.
    In Korea, from 1999 to 2021 when stalking punishment act has been enacted, stalking-related legislations have been proposed over 20 times, but such legislation has not been proceeded for over 20 years.
    As stalking prevention act, legislated in 2021 which is late compared to other countries like Germany or Japan, has been enacted for over a year, it requires many revisions as 15 revision proposals have been submitted to the congress.
    In this study, it has analyzed preceding research, revisions, and legislation of other countries to study major issues in current stalking punishment act and deduced its revisions.
    Issues with the current stalking punishment act include; the subject of stalking crime is limited to the victim and his/her family; second, the law can penalize the criminal only when the act itself is committed; third, there is limitation of crime not prosecuted against objection; fourth, online stalking is difficult to be punished despite the public legal demand; fifth, it is meager the regulation to report the stalkee in modifying emergency measure defined by the law; sixth, more powerful measures against the perpetrator is necessary. Such issue can argue that related content is insufficient in the regards that the law protects stalking victim and prevents stalking developing into violent crime with preemptive measure, which its prime legislative motive.
    Therefore, purpose of this study is to deduce a revision to improve insufficient aspects in protection of stalking victim. In this study, preceding studies, domestic legislations, and stalking-related regulations in Japan and Germany have been studied chronologically to derive such revision, and thus, its primary goal is to study overall legal system on stalking crime and changes in public perception, and solve issues of current legislation. Its second goal is to propose measures to adequately respond to possible stalking-related issues in Korea.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼