RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      Results of a Standard versus an Accelerated Ponseti Protocol for Clubfoot: A Prospective Randomized Study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106593977

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Background: The aim of this study was to compare the results of the standard once-weekly Ponseti casting technique to an accelerated twice-weekly regimen in our population cohort.
      Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted with a total of 100 consecutive patients (158 feet) being enrolled for the study. Fifty patients were randomized to each group and followed up for at least one year.
      Results: Initial mean Pirani score was 4.67 ± 0.73 in the standard group and 4.35 ± 0.76 in the accelerated group, and the score decreased to 0.34 ± 0.38 and 0.35 ± 0.31, respectively. Initial mean Dimeglio score was 11.75 ± 2.75 in the standard group and 10.51 ± 2.57 in the accelerated group, and the score decreased to 0.79 ± 0.77 and 0.79 ± 0.71, respectively, immediately after casting. The average number of casts required to correct all the deformities was 6.3 ± 1.2 in the standard group and 6.1 ± 1.4 in the accelerated group (p = 0.45). Average time spent in cast was 58.2 ± 8.3 days in the standard group and 39.5 ± 5.2 days in the accelerated group (p < 0.001). Percutaneous Achilles tendon tenotomy was done in 86.42% in the standard group and in 84.41% in the accelerated group (p = 0.72). Final results were assessed by using a modified functional rating scoring system: 55.55% clubfeet had excellent results and 44.45% had good results in the standard group, whereas 66.23% clubfeet had excellent results and 33.77% had good results in the accelerated group. None amongst the two groups had fair or poor results.
      Conclusions: These results suggest that the accelerated Ponseti technique significantly reduces the correction time without affecting the final results and that it is as safe and effective as the traditional Ponseti technique.
      번역하기

      Background: The aim of this study was to compare the results of the standard once-weekly Ponseti casting technique to an accelerated twice-weekly regimen in our population cohort. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted with a...

      Background: The aim of this study was to compare the results of the standard once-weekly Ponseti casting technique to an accelerated twice-weekly regimen in our population cohort.
      Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted with a total of 100 consecutive patients (158 feet) being enrolled for the study. Fifty patients were randomized to each group and followed up for at least one year.
      Results: Initial mean Pirani score was 4.67 ± 0.73 in the standard group and 4.35 ± 0.76 in the accelerated group, and the score decreased to 0.34 ± 0.38 and 0.35 ± 0.31, respectively. Initial mean Dimeglio score was 11.75 ± 2.75 in the standard group and 10.51 ± 2.57 in the accelerated group, and the score decreased to 0.79 ± 0.77 and 0.79 ± 0.71, respectively, immediately after casting. The average number of casts required to correct all the deformities was 6.3 ± 1.2 in the standard group and 6.1 ± 1.4 in the accelerated group (p = 0.45). Average time spent in cast was 58.2 ± 8.3 days in the standard group and 39.5 ± 5.2 days in the accelerated group (p < 0.001). Percutaneous Achilles tendon tenotomy was done in 86.42% in the standard group and in 84.41% in the accelerated group (p = 0.72). Final results were assessed by using a modified functional rating scoring system: 55.55% clubfeet had excellent results and 44.45% had good results in the standard group, whereas 66.23% clubfeet had excellent results and 33.77% had good results in the accelerated group. None amongst the two groups had fair or poor results.
      Conclusions: These results suggest that the accelerated Ponseti technique significantly reduces the correction time without affecting the final results and that it is as safe and effective as the traditional Ponseti technique.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Dobbs MB, "Update on clubfoot : etiology and treatment" 467 (467): 1146-1153, 2009

      2 Cooper DM, "Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot : a thirty-year follow-up note" 77 (77): 1477-1489, 1995

      3 Lohan I, "Treatment of congenital clubfoot using the Ponseti method: workshop manual" Global-HELP 18-36, 2009

      4 Elgohary HS, "Traditional and accelerated Ponseti technique : a comparative study" 25 (25): 949-953, 2015

      5 Scher DM, "The Ponseti method for treatment of congenital club foot" 18 (18): 22-25, 2006

      6 Elshenawy EM, "The Mansoura experience in the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot deformity using the Ponseti technique" 74 (74): 659-666, 2008

      7 Herring JA, "Tachdjian’s pediatric orthopaedics: from the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children" Saunders 913-, 2014

      8 Morcuende JA, "Results of an accelerated Ponseti protocol for clubfoot" 25 (25): 623-626, 2005

      9 Evans D, "Relapsed club foot" 43 (43): 722-733, 1961

      10 Kampa R, "Multidisciplinary management of clubfeet using the Ponseti method in a district general hospital setting" 2 (2): 463-467, 2008

      1 Dobbs MB, "Update on clubfoot : etiology and treatment" 467 (467): 1146-1153, 2009

      2 Cooper DM, "Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot : a thirty-year follow-up note" 77 (77): 1477-1489, 1995

      3 Lohan I, "Treatment of congenital clubfoot using the Ponseti method: workshop manual" Global-HELP 18-36, 2009

      4 Elgohary HS, "Traditional and accelerated Ponseti technique : a comparative study" 25 (25): 949-953, 2015

      5 Scher DM, "The Ponseti method for treatment of congenital club foot" 18 (18): 22-25, 2006

      6 Elshenawy EM, "The Mansoura experience in the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot deformity using the Ponseti technique" 74 (74): 659-666, 2008

      7 Herring JA, "Tachdjian’s pediatric orthopaedics: from the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children" Saunders 913-, 2014

      8 Morcuende JA, "Results of an accelerated Ponseti protocol for clubfoot" 25 (25): 623-626, 2005

      9 Evans D, "Relapsed club foot" 43 (43): 722-733, 1961

      10 Kampa R, "Multidisciplinary management of clubfeet using the Ponseti method in a district general hospital setting" 2 (2): 463-467, 2008

      11 Gray K, "Interventions for congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot)" (8) : CD008602-, 2014

      12 Giesberts RB, "Influence of cast change interval in the Ponseti method : a systematic review" 13 (13): e0199540-, 2018

      13 "Globalclubfoot.com" Global Clubfoot Initiative

      14 Terrazas-Lafargue G, "Effect of cast removal timing in the correction of idiopathic clubfoot by the Ponseti method" 27 : 24-27, 2007

      15 Gerlach DJ, "Early results of the Ponseti method for the treatment of clubfoot associated with myelomeningocele" 91 (91): 1350-1359, 2009

      16 Herring JA, "Congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot) in Tachdjian’s pediatric orthopedics" Saunders 921-, 2014

      17 Ponseti IV, "Congenital clubfoot: fundamentals of treatment" Oxford University Press 9-, 1996

      18 Ponseti IV, "Congenital clubfoot: fundamentals of treatment" Oxford University Press 61-81, 1996

      19 Cummings RJ, "Congenital clubfoot" 84 (84): 290-308, 2002

      20 Ponseti IV, "Congenital club foot : the results of treatment" 45 : 261-344, 1963

      21 Pirani S, "Clubfoot: Ponseti management" Global-HELP 27-, 2009

      22 Carroll NC, "Clubfoot in the twentieth century : where we were and where we may be going in the twenty-first century" 21 (21): 1-6, 2012

      23 Dimeglio A, "Classification of clubfoot" 4 (4): 129-136, 1995

      24 Harnett P, "An accelerated Ponseti versus the standard Ponseti method : a prospective randomised controlled trial" 93 (93): 404-408, 2011

      25 Simons GW, "A standardized method for the radiographic evaluation of clubfeet" (135) : 107-118, 1978

      26 Xu RJ, "A modified Ponseti method for the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot : a preliminary report" 31 (31): 317-319, 2011

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-12-01 평가 등재 탈락 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-04-14 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Orthopaedic Association KCI등재
      2013-10-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (기타) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.06 0.06 0.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.07 0.1 0.346 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼