RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Optionality and variation in English: a case of n/ŋ alternation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76397118

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Lee, Minkyuog. 2003. Optionality and variation in English: a case of n/? alternation. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 9.1. 149-166. This paper investigates n/? alternation in American English (AE) and British English (BE) and provides a constraint-based Optimality Theoretic account. With the analysis of n/? alternation in English, it is strongly argued that optionality and variation need to be distinguished with respect to each other under Optimality Theory (OT) model. Examining the data of n/? alternation found in both AE and BE, we find that optionality and variation are attributed to different evaluation procedures by different ranking strategies. They cannot be dealt with by the same and a single ranking strategy. One step further, the question why the same data behave differently in AE and BE will be addressed. Interestingly, AE and BE commonly involve optionality (or free variation) and language variation in n/?) alternation. For such multiple output phenomena in a single tableau, reversible ranking (Lee 200 I) will be adopted, which strictly allows reversibility only in cases where two constraints are locally adjacent to each other. Optionality takes place in a single evaluation tableau. Language variation in n/? alternation, however, results from the interaction of two constraints by re-ranking. Each evaluation tableau predicts only a single optimal form. Consequently, optionality and variation reflect difference of constraint interaction by different ranking strategies. (PUFS)
      번역하기

      Lee, Minkyuog. 2003. Optionality and variation in English: a case of n/? alternation. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 9.1. 149-166. This paper investigates n/? alternation in American English (AE) and British English (BE) and provides a...

      Lee, Minkyuog. 2003. Optionality and variation in English: a case of n/? alternation. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 9.1. 149-166. This paper investigates n/? alternation in American English (AE) and British English (BE) and provides a constraint-based Optimality Theoretic account. With the analysis of n/? alternation in English, it is strongly argued that optionality and variation need to be distinguished with respect to each other under Optimality Theory (OT) model. Examining the data of n/? alternation found in both AE and BE, we find that optionality and variation are attributed to different evaluation procedures by different ranking strategies. They cannot be dealt with by the same and a single ranking strategy. One step further, the question why the same data behave differently in AE and BE will be addressed. Interestingly, AE and BE commonly involve optionality (or free variation) and language variation in n/?) alternation. For such multiple output phenomena in a single tableau, reversible ranking (Lee 200 I) will be adopted, which strictly allows reversibility only in cases where two constraints are locally adjacent to each other. Optionality takes place in a single evaluation tableau. Language variation in n/? alternation, however, results from the interaction of two constraints by re-ranking. Each evaluation tableau predicts only a single optimal form. Consequently, optionality and variation reflect difference of constraint interaction by different ranking strategies. (PUFS)

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Previous ranking strategies and optionality
      • 3. Reversible ranking and optionality
      • 4. Nasal Place Assimilation
      • 5. The Constraint-based Analysis
      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Previous ranking strategies and optionality
      • 3. Reversible ranking and optionality
      • 4. Nasal Place Assimilation
      • 5. The Constraint-based Analysis
      • 6. n/? Alternation as Variation
      • 7. Conclusion
      • REFERENCES
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-04-03 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Phonology-Morphology Circle of Korea KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2012-12-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 음성·음운·형태론연구 -> 음성음운형태론연구 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.43 0.43 0.44
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.49 0.47 1.189 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼