법적인 ‘아버지’를 결정하기 위한 요건들에 관한 일고찰 - 미국에서의 논의를 중심으로 = A Study on Discourse on the Criteria for Establishing Paternity in U.S.A.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  In United States, Many state laws expresse the legislative belief that biological ties are not only an adequate basis for parental responsibility, but that they are the only basis for father-child relationships that will withstand court challenge. Courts, however, have often expressed uneasiness with this strong reliance on biology. They face situations in which a paternity determination based solely on the outcome of genetic testing will greatly disturb the status quo. The deep social and cultural ambivalence occasioned by the splintering of fatherhood into scientifically-verifiable biological and social relationships is reflected in the doctrinal chaos in the law concerning the marital presumption of paternity. Furthermore, another viewpoint is offered recently that suggests a different theory of paternity--one that can reconcile much of the case law, constitutional doctrine, and contemporary mores. It reveals that courts often root paternal obligation in contract with the mother, not biology.<BR>  Such an extraordinary lack of consistency among the states and often within an individual state is called into question is deeply troubling in United States. But thorough understanding many articles and opinions tried to get over this chaotic situation will be very useful in interpreting and looking over many articles in Korean Civil Code concernig establishment of paternity.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서언
  Ⅱ. 미국에서 논의되어 온 아버지 결정 기준 개관
  Ⅲ. 맺음말: 우리 민법의 해석론과 입법론
  《참고문헌》
  영문초록
  

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "자녀의 최선의 이익과 면접교섭권" 한국가족법학회 19 (19): 2005.3

2 "親生親子關係法의 問題點과 改善方向" 한국가족법학회 16 (16): 2002.6

3 "母의 친생부인권" 2001.9

4 "子女의 生父에 의한 親生否認에 관한 比較法的 考察" 한국가족법학회 20 (20): 2006.3

5 "The Constitutionality of “Best Interests” Parentage" 14 : 857-, 2006

6 "Somebody’s Child: Evaluating The Erosion of the Marital Presumption of Paternity" 102 : 547-, 2000

7 "Parentage at Birth: Birthfathers and Social Fatherhood" 14 : 909-, 2006

8 "Nature v. Nature: Children Left Fatherless and Familyless When Nature Prevails in Paternity Actions" 65 : 811-, 2004

9 "My Two Dads: Disaggregating Biological and Social Paternity" 38 : 809-, 2006

10 "Marriage, Biology, and Paternity: The Case for Revitalizing the Marital Presumption" 65 : 246-, 2006

11 "Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Best Interests Marital Presumption of Paternality: It is Actually in the Best Interest of Children to Divorce the Current Appliction of the Best Interests Marital Presumption of Paternality" 5 : 345-, 2006

12 "Bargaining or Biology? The History and Future of Paternity Law and Parental Status" 14 : 1-, 2004

13 "2002년 미국 통일친자법 제정의 의미와 그 내용" 한국가족법학회 17 (17): 2003.9