RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    취재의 자유와 알권리의 관계에 관한 고찰 = 공인수탁자론(public trusteeship model)에 대한 비판적 고찰을 중심으로

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In May 2007, the Roh Moo-hyun administration introduced a plan on the Program for advanced Mass communication News-gathering Support System, which is currently pending at the Constitutional Court.
    Journalists strongly criticized the plan, arguing that the Minimizing of press rooms restricts the people's right to know and violates the freedom of press. But Prime Minister Han Duck-soo said the project is aimed at upgrading the government's support system for news coverage and meeting what he described as global standards.
    The above debates are just based on the same analogies discussed under the public trusteeship model. In this regard, I believe that the on going contention was premature.
    The Korean government and Journalists should have assessed the applicability of the public trusteeship model within Korea's Constitutional framework.
    Through this study, I tried to analyze the constitutional meaning of the right to know and the freedom of news gathering in Korea and compare them with concepts under the US Constitution. This study is aimed at proposing a standard of judgement for disputes on violating the freedom of news gathering.
    번역하기

    In May 2007, the Roh Moo-hyun administration introduced a plan on the Program for advanced Mass communication News-gathering Support System, which is currently pending at the Constitutional Court. Journalists strongly criticized the plan, arguing t...

    In May 2007, the Roh Moo-hyun administration introduced a plan on the Program for advanced Mass communication News-gathering Support System, which is currently pending at the Constitutional Court.
    Journalists strongly criticized the plan, arguing that the Minimizing of press rooms restricts the people's right to know and violates the freedom of press. But Prime Minister Han Duck-soo said the project is aimed at upgrading the government's support system for news coverage and meeting what he described as global standards.
    The above debates are just based on the same analogies discussed under the public trusteeship model. In this regard, I believe that the on going contention was premature.
    The Korean government and Journalists should have assessed the applicability of the public trusteeship model within Korea's Constitutional framework.
    Through this study, I tried to analyze the constitutional meaning of the right to know and the freedom of news gathering in Korea and compare them with concepts under the US Constitution. This study is aimed at proposing a standard of judgement for disputes on violating the freedom of news gathering.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼