RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      개인 문제해결 상황에서 인지양식과 메타인지가 비구조 문제해결 및 논증에 미치는 효과 = The Effects of Cognitive Styles and Metacognition on Ill-structured Problem Solving and Argumentation in an Individual Problem Solving Situation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75434610

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to empirically investigate the effects of cognitive style (visualizers vs. verbalizers) and metacognition (knowledge of metacognition vs. regulation of metacognition) on problem solving and argumentation, when students individually tried to solve ill-structured problems. Each subject was asked to complete ill-structured problem solving test after he or she completed both questionnaires that identify his or her cognitive style and the level of metacognition. Eighty-three students were identified as visualizers twenty as verbalizers. The results of the study show as follows: First, verbalizers had higher score than visualizers in ill-structured problem solving and argumentation. This indicates that verbalizers performed better than visualizers in ill-structured problem solving and argumentation. However, no effects of cognitive styles were found on the sub-elements of argumentation. Second, no effects of both the knowledge of metacognition and the regulation of metacognition were found on ill-structured problem solving and argumentation. There are two possible explanations. One explanation is that because metacognition did not affect on the dependent variables, there would be no necessary to divide metacognition into the knowledge of metacognition and the regulation of metacognition and verify them. The other explanation is that from the first, there would be no necessary to divide metacognition into the knowledge of metacognition and the regulation of metacognition in comparing the scores of ill-structured problem solving and argumentation. Third, the correlations were identified between ill-structured problem solving and argumentation, which indicates that ill-structured problem solving and argumentation are closely related each other.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to empirically investigate the effects of cognitive style (visualizers vs. verbalizers) and metacognition (knowledge of metacognition vs. regulation of metacognition) on problem solving and argumentation, when students in...

      The purpose of this study was to empirically investigate the effects of cognitive style (visualizers vs. verbalizers) and metacognition (knowledge of metacognition vs. regulation of metacognition) on problem solving and argumentation, when students individually tried to solve ill-structured problems. Each subject was asked to complete ill-structured problem solving test after he or she completed both questionnaires that identify his or her cognitive style and the level of metacognition. Eighty-three students were identified as visualizers twenty as verbalizers. The results of the study show as follows: First, verbalizers had higher score than visualizers in ill-structured problem solving and argumentation. This indicates that verbalizers performed better than visualizers in ill-structured problem solving and argumentation. However, no effects of cognitive styles were found on the sub-elements of argumentation. Second, no effects of both the knowledge of metacognition and the regulation of metacognition were found on ill-structured problem solving and argumentation. There are two possible explanations. One explanation is that because metacognition did not affect on the dependent variables, there would be no necessary to divide metacognition into the knowledge of metacognition and the regulation of metacognition and verify them. The other explanation is that from the first, there would be no necessary to divide metacognition into the knowledge of metacognition and the regulation of metacognition in comparing the scores of ill-structured problem solving and argumentation. Third, the correlations were identified between ill-structured problem solving and argumentation, which indicates that ill-structured problem solving and argumentation are closely related each other.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "하이퍼텍스트 학습환경에서 학습전략, 메타인지, 작동기억이 성취도에 미치는 영향" 10 (10): 35-63, 2004

      2 "하이퍼미디어 학습 프로그램 구조와 학습자 인지양식이 초등학생 학업성취에 미치는 효과,컴퓨터교육학회논문지" 7 (7): 57-66, 2004

      3 "컴퓨터 시뮬레이션의 충실도 수준이 학습자의 인지양식에 따라 학업성취에 미치는 효과" 6 (6): 43-72, 2000

      4 "인지양식이 문제유형별 문제해결에 미치는 영향" 11 (11): 57-75, 2005

      5 "웹기반 학습환경에서 협력적 성찰이 문제해결 수행 및 과정에 미치는 영향" 19 (19): 131-159, 2003

      6 "웹기반 온라인 토론에서 성격특성과 익명성이 문제해결력에 미치는 영향" 7 (7): 53-86, 2001

      7 "온라인 토론 학습에서 논증모델의 활용이 학습자의 인지양식에 따라 논증기술 향상에 미치는 효과" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2003

      8 "수행평가를 위한 교육공학적 접근: 웹 기반 전자포트폴리오 개발" 18 (18): 51-78, 2002

      9 "메타인지와 하이퍼텍스트 구조가 저작체제 학습에 미치는 효과" 32 (32): 207-234, 1994

      10 "논증 스캐폴드와 문제의 유형이 논증의 질, 문제해결 성취도 및 집단의 효과성에 미치는 영향" 18 (18): 55-82, 2002

      1 "하이퍼텍스트 학습환경에서 학습전략, 메타인지, 작동기억이 성취도에 미치는 영향" 10 (10): 35-63, 2004

      2 "하이퍼미디어 학습 프로그램 구조와 학습자 인지양식이 초등학생 학업성취에 미치는 효과,컴퓨터교육학회논문지" 7 (7): 57-66, 2004

      3 "컴퓨터 시뮬레이션의 충실도 수준이 학습자의 인지양식에 따라 학업성취에 미치는 효과" 6 (6): 43-72, 2000

      4 "인지양식이 문제유형별 문제해결에 미치는 영향" 11 (11): 57-75, 2005

      5 "웹기반 학습환경에서 협력적 성찰이 문제해결 수행 및 과정에 미치는 영향" 19 (19): 131-159, 2003

      6 "웹기반 온라인 토론에서 성격특성과 익명성이 문제해결력에 미치는 영향" 7 (7): 53-86, 2001

      7 "온라인 토론 학습에서 논증모델의 활용이 학습자의 인지양식에 따라 논증기술 향상에 미치는 효과" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2003

      8 "수행평가를 위한 교육공학적 접근: 웹 기반 전자포트폴리오 개발" 18 (18): 51-78, 2002

      9 "메타인지와 하이퍼텍스트 구조가 저작체제 학습에 미치는 효과" 32 (32): 207-234, 1994

      10 "논증 스캐폴드와 문제의 유형이 논증의 질, 문제해결 성취도 및 집단의 효과성에 미치는 영향" 18 (18): 55-82, 2002

      11 "and transactions in solving everyday problems" 100-122, 1989

      12 "and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance" 329-363, 1983

      13 "and fantasy proneness in young adults" 1 25-4 32, 1989

      14 "Value of a Scale used to measure metacognitive reading awareness Journal of Educational Research" 81-87, 1991

      15 "The uses of argument" Cambridge University Press 1958

      16 "The relationship between well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in multimedia simulation" pennsylvania state university 1998

      17 "The nature and development of informal reasoning skills in college students" 1988

      18 "The interpersonal basis of everyday problem solving" 7-23, 1989

      19 "The effects of three levels of visual stimulus complexity on the information processing of field-dependents and field-independents when acquiring information for performance on three types of instructional objectives Journal of Instructional Psychology" 65-70, 1980

      20 "The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving" 50 (50): 5-22, 2002

      21 "The effect of computer-supported collaborative argumentation on argumentation skills in second-year law students" The Pennsylvania State University 1999

      22 "The conditions of learning" 1980

      23 "The assesment of verbal-imagery learning style and their effect on the recall of concrete and abstract prose passages by 11-year-old children British Journal of Psychology" 59-64, 1981

      24 "The Skills of Argument" Cambridge University Press 1991

      25 "Styles and strategies of learning" 46 : 128-148, 1976b

      26 "Student argumentative writing knowledge and ability at three grade levels" 23 (23): 62-76, 1989

      27 "Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition" 21-29, 1987

      28 "Some relations between them University of Maryland" 1982

      29 "Relationships between reading proficiency and field-dependence" Auburn University 1987

      30 "Reading versus listening in children the effects of extraversion and coding complexity" 47-58, 1982

      31 "Problem solving and reasoning in ill-structured domains A casebook of methods" In C SAGE Publications 74-93, 1988

      32 "Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an Astronomy simulation" 40 (40): 6-33, 2003

      33 "Perceptual imagery and verbal-conceptual determinants of the similarity attraction relationship" 3 (3): 159-174, 1983

      34 "On the solving of ill-structured problems The nature of expertise" 1988

      35 "On improving thinking through instruction" 15 : 3-57, 1988

      36 "Metacognitive processes in human computer interaction: Self-assessments of knowledge as predictors of computer expertise" 12 (12): 43-71, 2000

      37 "Metacognition and cognition monitoring:A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry" 34 (34): 906-911, 1979

      38 "Mechanisms of control and regulation in problem solving From cognition to behavior" & Friedrichsen Springer-Verlag 1985183-218

      39 "Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes" 45 (45): 65-94, 1997

      40 "Information-processing theory of human problem solving Handbook of learning and cognitive process" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 271-295, 1978

      41 "Individual differences in use of visual and verbal mediators" 27 : 49-62, 1982

      42 "Index of learning styles" 1991

      43 "Implicit theories about everyday problem solving Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association" 1993

      44 "Handbook of individual differences" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1993

      45 "From representation to decision An analysis of problem solving in international relations" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 119-157, 1991

      46 "From representation to decision An analysis of problem solving in international relations" 119-157, 1991

      47 "Field-dependence/field-independence and achievement in music reading University of Wisconsin" 1983

      48 "Felder and Silverman's Index of Learning Styles and Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles Questionnaire: How do they compare and how do they predict?" 20 (20): 365-381, 2000

      49 "Engineering student learning styles: a statistical analysis using Felder's Index of Learning Style" 2002

      50 "Effects of modes of computer assisted instruction on conceptual understanding and achievement of college students exhibiting individual differences in learning" 1987

      51 "Effects of adjective imagery on recall from prose" 94 (94): 295-299, 1976

      52 "Dyadic learning of technical material" 47-63, 1990

      53 "Creating classroom contexts that support young children's development of self-regulated learning" 33 : 821-843, 2000

      54 "Conversational techniques in the study and practice of education" 46 : 12-25, 1976a

      55 "Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behavior" David Fulton Publishers 1998

      56 "Cognitive development and cognitive style as factors in mathematics achievement Journal of Educational Psychology" 326-330, 1980

      57 "Children's metacognition about reading Issues in definition" 255-278, 1987

      58 "CSCL 환경에서 외적표상전략이 문제수행에 미치는 효과" 20 (20): 53-76, 2004

      59 "CMC 활용 학습에서 면대면 수업, 교사관여 및 메타인지가 학업성취와 상호작용에 미치는 효과" 9 (9): 95-128, 2003

      60 "CMC 활용 학습에서 면대면 수업 유무, 협력유형 및 메타인지가 학업성취와 상호작용에 미치는 효과" 9 (9): 37-64, 2003

      61 "An introduction to reasoning" Macmillan 1984

      62 "An exploration of the effect of structure variables on mathematical word problem-solving achievement" Rutgers University 1982

      63 "Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext Journal of Computer-Based Instruction" 1-8, 1993

      64 "A three-level model of cognitive processing" 222-232, 1983

      65 "A contribution of validation of score meaning for Felder-Soloman's Index of Learning Style,2003 Annual ASEE Conference" 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-04-20 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Association Of Educational Information & Broadcasting -> Korea Association for Educational Information and Media KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.59 1.59 1.95
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2 1.96 2.299 0.35
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼