RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      A Study on Bias Effect on Model Selection Criteria in Graphical Lasso

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105935205

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Graphical lasso is one of the most popular methods to estimate a sparse precision matrix, which is an inverse of a covariance matrix. The objective function of graphical lasso imposes an 1 A study on Bias Effect on Model Selection Criteria in Graphica...

      Graphical lasso is one of the most popular methods to estimate a sparse precision matrix, which is an inverse of a covariance matrix. The objective function of graphical lasso imposes an 1 A study on Bias Effect on Model Selection Criteria in Graphical Lasso Young-Geun Choi1, Seyoung Jeong2, Donghyeon Yu2* 1SK Telecom, Seoul 04539, Korea 2Department of Statistics, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea (Received Oct 8, 2018; Revised Nov 4, 2018; Accepted Nov 12, 2018) Abstract Graphical lasso is one of the most popular methods to estimate a sparse precision matrix, which is an inverse of a covariance matrix. The objective function of graphical lasso imposes an ℓ-penalty on the (vectorized) precision matrix, where a tuning parameter controls the strength of the penalization. The selection of the tuning parameter is practically and theoretically important since the performance of the estimation depends on an appropriate choice of tuning parameter. While information criteria (e.g. AIC, BIC, or extended BIC) have been widely used, they require an asymptotically unbiased estimator to select optimal tuning parameter. Thus, the biasedness of the ℓ- regularized estimate in the graphical lasso may lead to a suboptimal tuning. In this paper, we propose a two-staged bias-correction procedure for the graphical lasso, where the first stage runs the usual graphical lasso and the second stage reruns the procedure with an additional constraint that zero estimates at the first stage remain zero

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Fan Y, "Tuning parameter selection in high dimensional penalized likelihood" 75 : 531-552, 2013

      2 Zhao YJ, "Tumor markers for hepatocellular carcinoma" 1 : 593-598, 2013

      3 Danaher P, "The joint graphical lasso for inverse covariance estimation across multiple classes" 76 : 373-397, 2014

      4 Mazumder R, "The graphical lasso: new insights and alternatives" 6 : 2125-2149, 2012

      5 Yu D, "Statistical completion of a partially identified graph with applications for the estimation of gene regulatory networks" 16 : 670-685, 2015

      6 Friedman J, "Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso" 9 : 432-441, 2008

      7 김재희, "Review of Connectivity and Dynamics of Neural Information Processing" 자연과학연구소 36 (36): 97-103, 2017

      8 Tomida S, "Relapse-related molecular signature in lung adenocarcinomas identifies patients with dismal prognosis" 27 : 2793-2799, 2009

      9 Peng J, "Partial correlation estimation by joint sparse regression models" 104 : 735-746, 2009

      10 Witten D, "New insights and faster computations for the graphical lasso" 20 : 892-900, 2011

      1 Fan Y, "Tuning parameter selection in high dimensional penalized likelihood" 75 : 531-552, 2013

      2 Zhao YJ, "Tumor markers for hepatocellular carcinoma" 1 : 593-598, 2013

      3 Danaher P, "The joint graphical lasso for inverse covariance estimation across multiple classes" 76 : 373-397, 2014

      4 Mazumder R, "The graphical lasso: new insights and alternatives" 6 : 2125-2149, 2012

      5 Yu D, "Statistical completion of a partially identified graph with applications for the estimation of gene regulatory networks" 16 : 670-685, 2015

      6 Friedman J, "Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso" 9 : 432-441, 2008

      7 김재희, "Review of Connectivity and Dynamics of Neural Information Processing" 자연과학연구소 36 (36): 97-103, 2017

      8 Tomida S, "Relapse-related molecular signature in lung adenocarcinomas identifies patients with dismal prognosis" 27 : 2793-2799, 2009

      9 Peng J, "Partial correlation estimation by joint sparse regression models" 104 : 735-746, 2009

      10 Witten D, "New insights and faster computations for the graphical lasso" 20 : 892-900, 2011

      11 Vihinen P, "Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer:prognostic markers and therapeutic targets" 99 : 157-166, 2002

      12 Belloni A, "Least squares after model selection in high-dimensional sparse models" 19 : 521-547, 2013

      13 Oh JH, "Inference of radio-responsive gene regulatory networks using the graphical lasso algorithm" 15 : S5-, 2014

      14 Yu H, "Identification and validation of long noncoding RNA biomarkers in human nonsmall-cell lung carcinomas" 10 : 645-654, 2015

      15 Meinshausen N, "High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the lasso" 34 : 1436-1462, 2006

      16 Jordan MI, "Graphical models: foundations of neural computation. Computational neuroscience series" The MIT Press 2001

      17 Ali A, "Generalized pseudolikelihood methods for inverse covariance estimation" 54 : 280-288, 2017

      18 Menéndez P, "Gene regulatory networks from multifactorial perturbations using graphical Lasso: application to the DREAM4 challenge" 5 : 14147-, 2010

      19 Coloigner J, "Functional connectivity analysis for thalassemia disease based on a graphical lasso model" 2016

      20 Chen J, "Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces" 95 : 759-771, 2008

      21 Foygel R, "Extended Bayesian information criteria for Gaussian graphical models" 2010

      22 Mouallif M, "Expression profile of undifferentiated cell transcription factor 1 in normal and cancerous human epithelia" 95 : 251-259, 2014

      23 Sun YB, "Expression of KISS1 and KISS1R (GPR54) may be used as favorable prognostic markers for patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer" 43 : 521-530, 2013

      24 Pounds S, "Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values" 19 : 1236-1242, 2003

      25 Cai T, "Estimating sparse precision matrix: optimal rates of convergence and adaptive estimation" 44 : 455-488, 2016

      26 Guo J, "Estimating heterogeneous graphical models for discrete data with an application to roll call voting" 9 : 821-848, 2015

      27 Barabási A, "Emergence of scaling in random networks" 286 : 509-512, 1999

      28 Benjamini Y, "Controlling the False Discovery Rate:A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing" 57 : 289-300, 1995

      29 Wang T, "Consistent tuning parameter selection in high dimensional sparse linear regression" 102 : 1141-1151, 2011

      30 Jemal A, "Cancer statistics" 60 : 277-300, 2010

      31 Li X, "Biomarkers in the lung cancer diagnosis: a clinical perspective" 59 : 500-507, 2012

      32 Khare K, "A convex pseudolikelihood framework for high dimensional partial correlation estimation with convergence guarantees" 77 : 803-825, 2015

      33 Cai T, "A constrained l (1) minimization approach to sparse precision matrix estimation" 106 : 594-607, 2011

      34 Bolstad BM, "A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias" 19 : 185-193, 2003

      35 Tang H, "A 12-gene set predicts survival benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients" 19 : 1577-1586, 2013

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.08
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0.343 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼