RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국어 중급 학습자의 응결 장치 사용 연구 -발표 담화 분석을 중심으로- = A Study on Use of Cohesive Device of Intermediate Korean Language Learners: based on analysis of oral presentation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82687017

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study analyzes oral presentation given by intermediate Korean language learners to examine discourse cohesion shown upon using cohesive device. It focuses on the use of conjunctive adverb and connective ending, both as a cohesive device, in terms of their application and appropriacy, in particular, based on the variable L1 of learners. The application in their use is measured with quantitative analysis and the appropriacy with qualitative analysis. The analysis is confined to the use of conjunctive adverb and connective ending among other cohesive devices of discourse, resulting in varied application of conjunctive adverb according to the variable L1 and its higher error rate than connective ending in their use. On the contrary, it does not show any significant difference in using connective ending according to the variable L1 and relatively lower error rate than that of the conjunctive adverb. It is noteworthy that a Thai student as KFL and a Chinese student as KSL comparatively underuse conjunctive adverb. It is very critical to effectively use cohesive device including conjunctive adverb and connective ending for logical flow of oral presentation because the oral presentation is unidirectional form of discourse and should deliver a speaker`s discourse to audience even when shared knowledge or a schema of discourse is not given prior to the presentation. The use of cohesive device in oral presentation helps logical connection of discourse, thus reinforcing discourse cohesion and, for better understanding, enabling a listener to make logical inference about context of the discourse. In this regard, it is required to improve teaching and learning methods in accordance with the variable L1-based, different type of learners.
    번역하기

    This study analyzes oral presentation given by intermediate Korean language learners to examine discourse cohesion shown upon using cohesive device. It focuses on the use of conjunctive adverb and connective ending, both as a cohesive device, in terms...

    This study analyzes oral presentation given by intermediate Korean language learners to examine discourse cohesion shown upon using cohesive device. It focuses on the use of conjunctive adverb and connective ending, both as a cohesive device, in terms of their application and appropriacy, in particular, based on the variable L1 of learners. The application in their use is measured with quantitative analysis and the appropriacy with qualitative analysis. The analysis is confined to the use of conjunctive adverb and connective ending among other cohesive devices of discourse, resulting in varied application of conjunctive adverb according to the variable L1 and its higher error rate than connective ending in their use. On the contrary, it does not show any significant difference in using connective ending according to the variable L1 and relatively lower error rate than that of the conjunctive adverb. It is noteworthy that a Thai student as KFL and a Chinese student as KSL comparatively underuse conjunctive adverb. It is very critical to effectively use cohesive device including conjunctive adverb and connective ending for logical flow of oral presentation because the oral presentation is unidirectional form of discourse and should deliver a speaker`s discourse to audience even when shared knowledge or a schema of discourse is not given prior to the presentation. The use of cohesive device in oral presentation helps logical connection of discourse, thus reinforcing discourse cohesion and, for better understanding, enabling a listener to make logical inference about context of the discourse. In this regard, it is required to improve teaching and learning methods in accordance with the variable L1-based, different type of learners.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 국립국어원, "현대국어 사용 빈도 실태 조사" 국립국어원 2002

    2 강현화, "한국어이해교육론-이론과실제" 형설출판사 2009

    3 강현화, "한국어교육에서의 담화․화행 연구의 현황과 미래" 국제한국어교육학회 44-90, 2008

    4 김수정, "한국어 문법 교육을 위한 연결 어미 연구" 서울대학교 대학 원 2002

    5 이희자, "학습자용 어미․조사 사전" 한국문화사 2001

    6 국립국어원, "표준국어대사전" 두산동아 1999

    7 고영근, "우리말 문법론" 집문당 2008

    8 국립국어원, "외국인을 위한 한국어문법2" 커뮤니케이션북스 2005

    9 서상규, "외국인을 위한 한국어 학습 사전(Learner''s Dictionary of Korean)" 신원프라임 2006

    10 백봉자, "외국어로서의 한국어문법 사전" 연세대학교 출판부 1999

    1 국립국어원, "현대국어 사용 빈도 실태 조사" 국립국어원 2002

    2 강현화, "한국어이해교육론-이론과실제" 형설출판사 2009

    3 강현화, "한국어교육에서의 담화․화행 연구의 현황과 미래" 국제한국어교육학회 44-90, 2008

    4 김수정, "한국어 문법 교육을 위한 연결 어미 연구" 서울대학교 대학 원 2002

    5 이희자, "학습자용 어미․조사 사전" 한국문화사 2001

    6 국립국어원, "표준국어대사전" 두산동아 1999

    7 고영근, "우리말 문법론" 집문당 2008

    8 국립국어원, "외국인을 위한 한국어문법2" 커뮤니케이션북스 2005

    9 서상규, "외국인을 위한 한국어 학습 사전(Learner''s Dictionary of Korean)" 신원프라임 2006

    10 백봉자, "외국어로서의 한국어문법 사전" 연세대학교 출판부 1999

    11 이익섭, "국어학개설" 학연사 1986

    12 안경화, "구어체 텍스트의 응결 장치 연구 -토론 텍스트를 중심으로" 국제한국어교육학회 12 (12): 137-157, 2001

    13 Altenberg, B, "The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedisch learner's written English, In Learner English on Computer" Longman 80-93, 1998

    14 Granger,S, "The computer learner corpus: a versatile new source of data for SLA research, in Learner English on Computer" Longman 3-18, 1998

    15 Widdowson,H.G, "Teaching Language as Communication" Oxford University Press 1978

    16 Ellis,Rod, "Second Language Acquisition" Oxford University Press 1997

    17 Granger,S, "Learner English on Computer" Longman 1998

    18 Bachman,L, "Language Assessment in Practice" Oxford University Press 2010

    19 Meepoe,A.T, "How Thai ties: A discourse analysis for tying techniques in Thai" University of California, Berkeley. 1977

    20 Bachman,L, "Fundamental considerations in language testing" Oxford University Press 1990

    21 Hinkel, E, "From Theory to Practice: A Teacher's View, In Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1-12, 2002

    22 Celce-Murica, M, "Discourse and Context in Language Teaching" Cambridge University Press 2000

    23 Sinclair,J, "Basic Computer processing of long text, In Computer in English Language Teaching and Research" Longman 185-203, 1986

    24 Schiffrin,D, "Approaches to discourse" Cambridge University Press 1994

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.13 1.13 1.07
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.01 0.96 1.791 0.3
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼