RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    공영택지개발의 민·관 파트너십 과제와 전망: 공공·민간 공동택지개발사업의 민간 참여 및 요구도 실태조사를 중심으로 = Current Issues and Policy Improvement on Public and Private Partnership in Public Land Development

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101616505

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this article is examined the tasks and future directions for the public and private partnership in public land development introduced in July 2007. A fact-finding survey was circulated to 240 companies selected upon recommendation of the Korea Housing Builders Association and the Korea Housing Association and 134 companies responded.
    Results revealed that the following factors were needed for stable implementation of joint public-private land development projects: consideration should be given to special characteristics of participating companies, simplification of project implementation procedures and pace, and shortening of negotiation time. Moreover, it is proposed that equitable participation, efficient implementation, and fairness in selection of joint partners are essential prerequisites. The paper also proposes ways to encourage SPC and consortiums as methods of executing land development projects prior to having the competition between public and private sectors in addition to some proposals on how to overcome the difficulties of striking a harmony between the synergic effects(profitability) of joint development and cost-saving development(public interest).
    번역하기

    The purpose of this article is examined the tasks and future directions for the public and private partnership in public land development introduced in July 2007. A fact-finding survey was circulated to 240 companies selected upon recommendation of th...

    The purpose of this article is examined the tasks and future directions for the public and private partnership in public land development introduced in July 2007. A fact-finding survey was circulated to 240 companies selected upon recommendation of the Korea Housing Builders Association and the Korea Housing Association and 134 companies responded.
    Results revealed that the following factors were needed for stable implementation of joint public-private land development projects: consideration should be given to special characteristics of participating companies, simplification of project implementation procedures and pace, and shortening of negotiation time. Moreover, it is proposed that equitable participation, efficient implementation, and fairness in selection of joint partners are essential prerequisites. The paper also proposes ways to encourage SPC and consortiums as methods of executing land development projects prior to having the competition between public and private sectors in addition to some proposals on how to overcome the difficulties of striking a harmony between the synergic effects(profitability) of joint development and cost-saving development(public interest).

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this article is examined the tasks and future directions for the public and private partnership in public land development introduced in July 2007. A fact-finding survey was circulated to 240 companies selected upon recommendation of the Korea Housing Builders Association and the Korea Housing Association and 134 companies responded.
    Results revealed that the following factors were needed for stable implementation of joint public-private land development projects: consideration should be given to special characteristics of participating companies, simplification of project implementation procedures and pace, and shortening of negotiation time. Moreover, it is proposed that equitable participation, efficient implementation, and fairness in selection of joint partners are essential prerequisites. The paper also proposes ways to encourage SPC and consortiums as methods of executing land development projects prior to having the competition between public and private sectors in addition to some proposals on how to overcome the difficulties of striking a harmony between the synergic effects(profitability) of joint development and cost-saving development(public interest).
    번역하기

    The purpose of this article is examined the tasks and future directions for the public and private partnership in public land development introduced in July 2007. A fact-finding survey was circulated to 240 companies selected upon recommendation of th...

    The purpose of this article is examined the tasks and future directions for the public and private partnership in public land development introduced in July 2007. A fact-finding survey was circulated to 240 companies selected upon recommendation of the Korea Housing Builders Association and the Korea Housing Association and 134 companies responded.
    Results revealed that the following factors were needed for stable implementation of joint public-private land development projects: consideration should be given to special characteristics of participating companies, simplification of project implementation procedures and pace, and shortening of negotiation time. Moreover, it is proposed that equitable participation, efficient implementation, and fairness in selection of joint partners are essential prerequisites. The paper also proposes ways to encourage SPC and consortiums as methods of executing land development projects prior to having the competition between public and private sectors in addition to some proposals on how to overcome the difficulties of striking a harmony between the synergic effects(profitability) of joint development and cost-saving development(public interest).

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김영학, "토지관리분야의 민관협력(PPP) 활성화" 21 (21): 33-49, 2005

    2 박헌주, "택지개발제도의 합리화 방안" 국토연구원 1993

    3 장성수, "택지개발의 민간사업참여 활성화 방안연구" 주택산업연구원 2006

    4 장성수, "민간택지개발사업 발전방안 연구" 주택산업연구원 2005

    5 윤혜정, "민간제안에 의한 도시개발사업의 실태와 발전 방안" 국토연구원 2005

    6 장성수, "민간 택지개발 활성화 방안 연구" 주택산업연구원 2004

    7 방경식, "민간 택지개발 활성화 방안" 주택산업연구원 1999

    8 진미윤, "공동택지개발사업의 평가와 개선방안" 대한국토도시계획학회 35 (35): 49-60, 2000

    9 임서환, "공동택지개발사업과 공사의 참여 전략" 주택산업연구원 2000

    10 정희남, "공공택지 및 분양주택 공급제도 개선방안" 국토연구원 2004

    1 김영학, "토지관리분야의 민관협력(PPP) 활성화" 21 (21): 33-49, 2005

    2 박헌주, "택지개발제도의 합리화 방안" 국토연구원 1993

    3 장성수, "택지개발의 민간사업참여 활성화 방안연구" 주택산업연구원 2006

    4 장성수, "민간택지개발사업 발전방안 연구" 주택산업연구원 2005

    5 윤혜정, "민간제안에 의한 도시개발사업의 실태와 발전 방안" 국토연구원 2005

    6 장성수, "민간 택지개발 활성화 방안 연구" 주택산업연구원 2004

    7 방경식, "민간 택지개발 활성화 방안" 주택산업연구원 1999

    8 진미윤, "공동택지개발사업의 평가와 개선방안" 대한국토도시계획학회 35 (35): 49-60, 2000

    9 임서환, "공동택지개발사업과 공사의 참여 전략" 주택산업연구원 2000

    10 정희남, "공공택지 및 분양주택 공급제도 개선방안" 국토연구원 2004

    11 건설교통부, "건설통계연보" 건설교통부 02~07

    12 권오현, "건설업체의 사업타당성조사 분석?실태 연구-주택?건축 개발사업을 중심으로" 한국건설산업연구원 2004

    13 대한건설협회, "건설업 금융실태조사" 대한걸설협회 2007

    14 Evans, Brendan., "The Politics of Partnerships: Urban Regeneration in New East Manchester" 22 (22): 201-215, 2007

    15 Ball, Michael, "Synergy in Urban Regeneration Partnerships: Property Agents' Perspectives" 40 (40): 2239-2253, 2003

    16 Trafford, Sue, "Successful joint venture partnerships: public-private partnerships" 19 (19): 117-129, 2006

    17 Diamond, John., "Strategies to Resolve Conflict in Partnerships: Reflections on UK urban regeneration" 15 (15): 296-306, 2002

    18 HM Treasury, "Standardisation of PFI Contracts" HM Treasury 2007

    19 The World Bank, "Selecting an option for private sector partnership" The World Bank 1997

    20 Fraser, James C., "Role of Public, Private, Non-profit and Community Sectors in Shaping Mixed-income Housing Outcomes in the US" 44 (44): 2357-2377, 2007

    21 Strategic Partnering Taskforce, "Rethinking Service Delivery" ODPM 4 : 2004

    22 Strategic Partnering Taskforce, "Rethinking Service Delivery" ODPM 5 : 2004

    23 Hood, John, "Managing the Risks of Public-Private Partnerships in Scottish Local Government" ODPM 23 (23): 21-35, 2002

    24 Bailey, Nick, "Local Strategic Partnerships in England: The Continuing Search for Collaborative Advantage, Leadership and Strategy in Urban Governance" 4 (4): 443-457, 2003

    25 Zhang, Xuequing, "Critical Success Factors for Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure Development" 134 (134): 3-14, 2005

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-06-15 학술지등록 한글명 : 국토연구
    외국어명 : The Korea Spatial Planning Review
    KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.86 0.86 0.92
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.83 0.85 1.241 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼