RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      조선시대 대중국 외교문서의 접수ㆍ보존체계 = The reception and storage System of foreign documents against China in Joseon Dynasty

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76535981

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The service that receive, store and preserve the foreign documents(事大文書) hold a key post in Joseon, unlike other state documents. It was important that these documents had a democratic gravity to China. Also, They reflected the decision-making process of foreign policy to China. However, works on this subject have been insufficient in spite of it`s importance.
      The administration system of the foreign documents proceeded step by step in production, delivery, reception, and custody. They were classified the Joseon and the China document in first stage of reception. On the subject of production, the state document was classified as the institutional and personal things in the era of Ch'ing and Ming. Also, on the object of reception, they were classified as Sanghangmun(上行文), Hahangmun(下行文), Pyeonghangmun(平行文), and especially there was Imperial thing. They had a rigorous system of implementation, and the institutional and imperial documents were important in Joseon-China ties.
      There was the imperial document which was issued in Joseon by the necessity of China or the demand of Joseon. While the document in relation to the enthronement of King as a rule was issued by King`s administration, It must be undertaken a thorough producing and issuing process by the demand of Joseon. The reception had four ways. the first way was that envoys transcribed the original copy, the second way was that the government dispatched an envoy, the third way was that the document was issued when envoy returned, and the fourth way was that the institution issued it in Joseon. While there was an enormous amount of transcription copy, they were ambiguous as official documents. The way which an Emperor or Chinese envoy issued had an entertainment burden. And they must have delivered the answer documents. But, it was an opportunity of democratic expansion for Joseon, when Chinese envoy visited.
      The document issuance procedures of china was the reception of Joseon. A prompt report was most important in the reception procedures. In order to this purpose, the role of SunRhyetongsa(先來通事) was emphasized. The entertainment for envoy was controversial because they recognised him as Emperor`s spokesman. A division in charge of storing was Sungmunwon. While in the early founding of country, there was the drawbacks. King Sejong determined the Uiju(儀注) of the storing system and it was the criteria of production and preservation. It was enacted in Gyeonggukdaejeon(經國大典).
      The preservation was a form of registration, since it was impossible that all documents were preserved. A few forms were organized, such as 《imun(吏文)》 in the early of Joseon, 《Seungmunwon deungnok(承文院謄錄)》 in the 15~16th century, and 《Dongmunhwigo(同文彙考)》 in the late of Joseon. While these documents were the original copy, they have historical importance in terms of summarizing the foreign affairs.
      The storage of foreign documents made full use of the foreign affairs and policy. They often became a cause of the diplomatic quagmire. This argument based on the oriental political tradition of propriety(禮). Thus, it was necessary that Joseon organized the system of documents storage. In the result of that, 《Dongmunhwigo》 as summation of all documents was published, and publishing the continuation have continued until the fall of Joseon.
      번역하기

      The service that receive, store and preserve the foreign documents(事大文書) hold a key post in Joseon, unlike other state documents. It was important that these documents had a democratic gravity to China. Also, They reflected the decision-making...

      The service that receive, store and preserve the foreign documents(事大文書) hold a key post in Joseon, unlike other state documents. It was important that these documents had a democratic gravity to China. Also, They reflected the decision-making process of foreign policy to China. However, works on this subject have been insufficient in spite of it`s importance.
      The administration system of the foreign documents proceeded step by step in production, delivery, reception, and custody. They were classified the Joseon and the China document in first stage of reception. On the subject of production, the state document was classified as the institutional and personal things in the era of Ch'ing and Ming. Also, on the object of reception, they were classified as Sanghangmun(上行文), Hahangmun(下行文), Pyeonghangmun(平行文), and especially there was Imperial thing. They had a rigorous system of implementation, and the institutional and imperial documents were important in Joseon-China ties.
      There was the imperial document which was issued in Joseon by the necessity of China or the demand of Joseon. While the document in relation to the enthronement of King as a rule was issued by King`s administration, It must be undertaken a thorough producing and issuing process by the demand of Joseon. The reception had four ways. the first way was that envoys transcribed the original copy, the second way was that the government dispatched an envoy, the third way was that the document was issued when envoy returned, and the fourth way was that the institution issued it in Joseon. While there was an enormous amount of transcription copy, they were ambiguous as official documents. The way which an Emperor or Chinese envoy issued had an entertainment burden. And they must have delivered the answer documents. But, it was an opportunity of democratic expansion for Joseon, when Chinese envoy visited.
      The document issuance procedures of china was the reception of Joseon. A prompt report was most important in the reception procedures. In order to this purpose, the role of SunRhyetongsa(先來通事) was emphasized. The entertainment for envoy was controversial because they recognised him as Emperor`s spokesman. A division in charge of storing was Sungmunwon. While in the early founding of country, there was the drawbacks. King Sejong determined the Uiju(儀注) of the storing system and it was the criteria of production and preservation. It was enacted in Gyeonggukdaejeon(經國大典).
      The preservation was a form of registration, since it was impossible that all documents were preserved. A few forms were organized, such as 《imun(吏文)》 in the early of Joseon, 《Seungmunwon deungnok(承文院謄錄)》 in the 15~16th century, and 《Dongmunhwigo(同文彙考)》 in the late of Joseon. While these documents were the original copy, they have historical importance in terms of summarizing the foreign affairs.
      The storage of foreign documents made full use of the foreign affairs and policy. They often became a cause of the diplomatic quagmire. This argument based on the oriental political tradition of propriety(禮). Thus, it was necessary that Joseon organized the system of documents storage. In the result of that, 《Dongmunhwigo》 as summation of all documents was published, and publishing the continuation have continued until the fall of Joseon.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 중국문서의 종류와 사대문서
      • Ⅲ. 사대문서의 접수체계
      • Ⅳ. 사대문서의 보존체계
      • Ⅴ. 외교문제로서의 사대문서
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 중국문서의 종류와 사대문서
      • Ⅲ. 사대문서의 접수체계
      • Ⅳ. 사대문서의 보존체계
      • Ⅴ. 외교문제로서의 사대문서
      • Ⅵ. 맺음말
      • 〈ABSTRACT〉
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (재인증)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.15 1.15 1.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.21 1.16 2.615 0.53
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼