RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    고등교육기관의 부패와 윤리적 대응 방안 = Ethical Responses to the Corruption of Higher Educational Institutions

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101862865

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Educational corruption practices exist in every culture. In every educational institution, in every country and generation, there is a struggle between corrupt practices and the continuing quest for high ethical standards. A distinction may be drawn between widespread institutional corruption and the corruption of renegade individuals within an otherwise ethically sound educational program.
    In this article, I don't use the terms 'corrupt' and 'unethical' synonymously. All corrupt practices are unethical, but not all unethical practices are corrupt. Corrupt educational practices often relate to the work of college and university employees, such as faculty members and administrators. However, corruption in education must be distinguished from incompetence of them.
    This article generally focuses on higher education. First, it offers examples of educational corruption from around the world to make clear the multi-faceted nature of the problems, illustrating that related challenges see no geographic scopes. Then it considers the basic principles that should shape efforts to deter, expose, and penalize corruption in academic enterprises. And then it transforms those principles into best practices that should be followed
    by educational entities who aspire to high standards. Some of those best practices relate to the role that ethics codes and laws can play in fighting educational corruption. It also explores the ethical unacceptability of certain practices, such as buying admission into an education program, plagiarism, and bogus degrees. It finally offers concluding thoughts about the never-ending battle between corruption and ethics in academia.
    번역하기

    Educational corruption practices exist in every culture. In every educational institution, in every country and generation, there is a struggle between corrupt practices and the continuing quest for high ethical standards. A distinction may be drawn b...

    Educational corruption practices exist in every culture. In every educational institution, in every country and generation, there is a struggle between corrupt practices and the continuing quest for high ethical standards. A distinction may be drawn between widespread institutional corruption and the corruption of renegade individuals within an otherwise ethically sound educational program.
    In this article, I don't use the terms 'corrupt' and 'unethical' synonymously. All corrupt practices are unethical, but not all unethical practices are corrupt. Corrupt educational practices often relate to the work of college and university employees, such as faculty members and administrators. However, corruption in education must be distinguished from incompetence of them.
    This article generally focuses on higher education. First, it offers examples of educational corruption from around the world to make clear the multi-faceted nature of the problems, illustrating that related challenges see no geographic scopes. Then it considers the basic principles that should shape efforts to deter, expose, and penalize corruption in academic enterprises. And then it transforms those principles into best practices that should be followed
    by educational entities who aspire to high standards. Some of those best practices relate to the role that ethics codes and laws can play in fighting educational corruption. It also explores the ethical unacceptability of certain practices, such as buying admission into an education program, plagiarism, and bogus degrees. It finally offers concluding thoughts about the never-ending battle between corruption and ethics in academia.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • ABSTRACT
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 — 고등교육기관의 윤리적 상황
    • Ⅱ. 고등교육기관의 부패행위의 의의와 특성
    • Ⅲ. 부패행위의 유형
    • Ⅳ. 고등교육기관의 부패에 대한 윤리적 대응 방안
    • ABSTRACT
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 — 고등교육기관의 윤리적 상황
    • Ⅱ. 고등교육기관의 부패행위의 의의와 특성
    • Ⅲ. 부패행위의 유형
    • Ⅳ. 고등교육기관의 부패에 대한 윤리적 대응 방안
    • Ⅴ. 결 어
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Jennifer Washburn, "University Inc.: The Corporate Corruption of American Higher Education xvi"

    2 Vincent R. Johnson, "The Virtues and Limits of Codes in Legal Ethics, 14 NOTRE DAME J. L. ETHICS & PUB. POL'Y 25"

    3 Mark L. Adams, "The Quest for Tenure: Job Security and Academic Freedom, 56 CATH. U. L. REV. 67"

    4 Vincent Robert Johnson, "The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizens of 1789, the Reign of Terror, and the Revolutionary Tribunal of Paris, 13 B.C. Int'l & COMP. L. REV. 1"

    5 David L. Kirp, "Shakespeare, Einstein, and The Bottom Line" THE MARKETING OF HIGHER EDUCATION 2003

    6 Carl Oxholm III, "Sarbanes-Oxley in Higher Education: Bringing Corporate America's "Best Practices, to Academia, 31 J.C. & U.L. 351"

    7 Kathryn L. Plemmons, "Lobbying Activities and Presidential Pardons: Will Legislators' Efforts to Amend the LDA Lead to Increasingly Hard-Lined Jurisprudence?, 18 B.Y.U. J. PUB. L. 131"

    8 Nicole Gilkeson, "For-Profit Scandal in the Nonprofit World: Should States Force Sarbanes-Oxley Provisions onto Nonprofit Corporations? 95 GEO L.J. 831"

    9 Vincent R. Johnson, "Ethics in Government at the Local Level, 36 SETON HALL L. REV. 715"

    10 Mark W. Huddleston, "Enforcing Administrative Ethics, 537 ANNALS AM. ACAD. POL. & SOC. SCI. 139"

    1 Jennifer Washburn, "University Inc.: The Corporate Corruption of American Higher Education xvi"

    2 Vincent R. Johnson, "The Virtues and Limits of Codes in Legal Ethics, 14 NOTRE DAME J. L. ETHICS & PUB. POL'Y 25"

    3 Mark L. Adams, "The Quest for Tenure: Job Security and Academic Freedom, 56 CATH. U. L. REV. 67"

    4 Vincent Robert Johnson, "The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizens of 1789, the Reign of Terror, and the Revolutionary Tribunal of Paris, 13 B.C. Int'l & COMP. L. REV. 1"

    5 David L. Kirp, "Shakespeare, Einstein, and The Bottom Line" THE MARKETING OF HIGHER EDUCATION 2003

    6 Carl Oxholm III, "Sarbanes-Oxley in Higher Education: Bringing Corporate America's "Best Practices, to Academia, 31 J.C. & U.L. 351"

    7 Kathryn L. Plemmons, "Lobbying Activities and Presidential Pardons: Will Legislators' Efforts to Amend the LDA Lead to Increasingly Hard-Lined Jurisprudence?, 18 B.Y.U. J. PUB. L. 131"

    8 Nicole Gilkeson, "For-Profit Scandal in the Nonprofit World: Should States Force Sarbanes-Oxley Provisions onto Nonprofit Corporations? 95 GEO L.J. 831"

    9 Vincent R. Johnson, "Ethics in Government at the Local Level, 36 SETON HALL L. REV. 715"

    10 Mark W. Huddleston, "Enforcing Administrative Ethics, 537 ANNALS AM. ACAD. POL. & SOC. SCI. 139"

    11 Vincent R. Johnsom, "Corruption in Education : A Global Legal Change, 48 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 1"

    12 Myroslava Antonovych, "Corruption as a Problem in Ukraine's Scholarship and Education, in 11 The Fulbrighter in Ukraine"

    13 SUSAN ROSE-ACKERMAN, "CORRUPTION AND GOVERNMENT: CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES, AND REFORMS 3"

    14 Vincent R. Johnson, "America's Preoccupation with Ethics in Government, 30 St. MARY'S L.J. 717"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2017-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.19 0.19 0.22
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.21 0.19 0.324 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼