This paper explores the learners perspective of the small group work by accomplishing an assignment out of the classroom. For this, there are three research questions: ①Are the learners satisfied with their small group work? ②Are there any correl...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106297162
2019
-
373
KCI등재
학술저널
721-736(16쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This paper explores the learners perspective of the small group work by accomplishing an assignment out of the classroom. For this, there are three research questions: ①Are the learners satisfied with their small group work? ②Are there any correl...
This paper explores the learners perspective of the small group work by accomplishing an assignment out of the classroom. For this, there are three research questions: ①Are the learners satisfied with their small group work? ②Are there any correlation between the learners satisfaction and their backgrounds such as their
gender, major, and English competence. ③What opinions do the learners have on the details of small group work? One hundred forty students participated in the study. They were given an assignment which was to make their own groups by themselves and accomplish their own goals during one month. After completing their assignments, they
were asked to respond to a questionnaire. The survey was analysed, and the findings are as follows: ①60% of the participants were satisfied with their small group works whereas 10% of the students were not. The two key words time and efficiency were derived from the students reasons for their satisfaction. Dissatisfied students
highlighted negative aspects of time while satisfied learners appreciated efficiency for their group work. ②There were no correlations between satisfaction degree of the small group work and the learners gender and major except for their English competence. However, the correlation of between the degree of satisfaction and the
English competence was very low. ③The students identified their opinions about the details of their small group work. They preferred improving their English ability as the best goal of their work. They responded that 4 students were most proper for forming a group. They also mentioned that close classmates are best for composing a group.
According to the findings of the study, 1 month was the most suitable time period for a group work. In regards to the criteria of their work assessment, the participants preferred the result of the work to the procedure of the work. From the results of the study, it is revealed that the learners have their own independent and autonomous idea
for accomplishing their small group work. Therefore, the results of the study will be useful not only for more efficient small group works but also for other successful learner-centered activities in English classroom
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 김선주, "협업에 관한 대학생의 인식 연구" 한국교양교육학회 12 (12): 11-37, 2018
2 Harmer, J., "The practice of English Language Teaching" Longman 1996
3 Krashen, S. D., "The natural approach: language acquisition in the classroom" Alemany Press 1983
4 Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind in Society" Harvard University Press 1978
5 Coelho, E., "Learning Together in the Multicultural classroom" Pippin Publishing Corporation 1996
6 Long, M. H., "Group Work, Interlanguage Talk, and Second Language Acquisition" 19 : 207-228, 1985
7 Chang, L. Y. -H., "Group Processes and EFL Learners' Motivation : A Study of Group Dynamics in EFL Classroom" 44 (44): 129-153, 2010
8 Slavin, R. E., "Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice" Prentice Hall 1990
9 Sharan, S., "Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research" Praeger 1990
10 Sharan, S., "Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research" Praeger 173-202, 1990
1 김선주, "협업에 관한 대학생의 인식 연구" 한국교양교육학회 12 (12): 11-37, 2018
2 Harmer, J., "The practice of English Language Teaching" Longman 1996
3 Krashen, S. D., "The natural approach: language acquisition in the classroom" Alemany Press 1983
4 Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind in Society" Harvard University Press 1978
5 Coelho, E., "Learning Together in the Multicultural classroom" Pippin Publishing Corporation 1996
6 Long, M. H., "Group Work, Interlanguage Talk, and Second Language Acquisition" 19 : 207-228, 1985
7 Chang, L. Y. -H., "Group Processes and EFL Learners' Motivation : A Study of Group Dynamics in EFL Classroom" 44 (44): 129-153, 2010
8 Slavin, R. E., "Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice" Prentice Hall 1990
9 Sharan, S., "Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research" Praeger 1990
10 Sharan, S., "Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research" Praeger 173-202, 1990
11 Bruffee, K. A., "Collaborative Learning Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge" Johns Hopkins UP 1999
12 Fushino, K., "Causal Relationships Between Communication Confidence, Beliefs About Group Work, and Willingness to Communicate in Foreign Language Group Work" 44 (44): 700-724, 2010
13 Szostek, C., "Assessing the Effects of Cooperative Learning in an Honors Foreign Language Classroom" 27 : 252-261, 1994
14 Race, P., "500 Tips on Group Learning" Kogan Page 2000
15 Isaac, M. L., ""I Hate Group Work!"Social Loafers, Indignant Peers, and the Drama of the Classroom" 101 (101): 83-89, 2012
JigsawⅡ 협동학습이 NCS기반 자동화설비과목 PLC단원의 학업성취도에 미치는 효과
유아기 자녀를 양육하는 어머니의 자아존중감, 정서표현성, 양육스트레스가 양육행동에 미치는 영향
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-06 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction -> The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.31 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.37 | 1.42 | 1.436 | 0.33 |
미남교수가 진행하는 학습자 중심의 수업
신한대학교 신종우학생들이 본 수업 하루 전에 카카오톡 음성 녹음으로 진행될 수업 내용을 미리 발표하는 학습자 중심의 교수법
신한대학교 신종우미남교수의 선행학습 영상을 토대로 30분 녹화영상으로 스피치 하는 학습자 중심의 참여형 교수법
신한대학교 신종우모든 학생들이 내일 수업진행 줄거리를 수업 전날 저녁에 카카오톡 음성메시지로 녹음하여 단톡방에 업로드하는 미남교수의 학습자 중심의 교수법
신한대학교 신종우미래를 위한 교수법 ② : 학습자 중심 비대면 교육
K-MOOC 단국대학교 김민정, 전은화, 정효정, 황윤자, 김혜원