1. Attention Is All You Need., A. Vaswani et al., arXiv 2023 AccessedOnline Available http//arxiv org/abs/1706.03762, , 2024
2. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners., T. B. Brown et al., arXiv Jul. 22,2020 AccessedOnline Availablehttp//arxiv org/abs/2005.14165, , 2024
3. Can GPT-3 Pass a Writer’s Turing Test?, J. Chun, K. Elkins and, vol. 5, no. 2, doi10.22148/001c.17212, , 2020
4. Not Enough Data? Deep Learning to the Rescue, A. Anaby-Tavor et al., arXiv Accessed 2024Online Availablehttp//arxiv org/abs/1911.03118, , 2019
5. The class imbalance problemA systematic study1, N. Japkowicz and, S. Stephen, Intell. Data Anal., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 429–449, doi10.3233/IDA-2002-6504, , 2002
6. GPT-3Its Nature, Scope, Limits, andConsequences, M. Chiriatti, L. Floridi and, Minds Mach., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 681–694, doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1, , 2020
7. Data Imbalance Problem in Text Classification,in, G. Sun and, Y. Li, Y. Zhu, 2010 Third International Symposium on Information Processing, Qingdao,Shandong, ChinaIEEE, pp. 301–305. doi10.1109/ISIP.2010.47, , 2010
8. The surveyText generation models in deeplearning, T. Iqbal and, S. Qureshi, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 2515–2528, doi10.1016/j. jksuci.2020.04.001, , 2022
9. 53 Aaron Courville - Deep Learningpre-pub version, Yoshua Bengio, Ian Goodfellow, -MIT Press pdf, , 2016
10. Dealing with Data Imbalance in TextClassification, C. Padurariu and, M. E. Breaban, vol. 159, pp. 736–745, doi:10.1016/j. procs.2019.09.229, , 2019
11. Glove: Global vectors for word representation, in, J. Pennington, C. Manning, R. Socher and, Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on EmpiricalMethods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar:Association for Computational Linguistics pp. 1532–1543. doi:10.3115/v1/D14-1162, , 2014
12. Text Generation forImbalanced Text Classification, S. Sinthupinyo, P. Kachamas and, S. Akkaradamrongrat, 2019 16th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE), Chonburi, ThailandIEEE, pp. 181–186. doi10.1109/JCSSE.2019.8864181, , 2019
13. Metrics for Multi-Class Classification:an Overview., M. Grandini, G. Visani, E. Bagli and, arXiv, AccessedOnline Available http//arxiv org/abs/2008.05756, , 2020
14. Train Test Validation SplitHow To & Best Practices., P. Baheti, AccessedOnline Available https//www. v7labs. com/blog/train-validation-test-set#h1, , 2024
15. A Brief History of DeepLearning-Based Text Generation, A. Bas, I. Van Heerden, M. O. Topal, C. Duman and, in 2022 International Conference onComputer and Applications (ICCA), Cairo, EgyptIEEE, pp. 1–4. doi10.1109/ICCA56443.2022.10039545, , 2022
16. Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Better., K. Lee et al., arXiv AccessedOnline Availablehttp//arxiv org/abs/2107.06499, , 2022
17. A Brief Survey of Word Embedding and Its RecentDevelopment, Q. Jiao and, S. Zhang, in 2021 IEEE 5th Advanced Information Technology,Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC), Chongqing, China:IEEE, pp. 1697–1701. doi10.1109/IAEAC50856.2021.9390956, , 2021
18. Sentiment Classification Using ConvolutionalNeural Networks, H. Kim and, Y.-S. Jeong, vol. 9, no. 11, p. 2347, doi:10.3390/app9112347, , 2019
19. Sentiment analysismining opinions, sentiments, and emotions, B. Liu, NewYork, NYCambridge University Press, , 2015
20. Document Processing:Methods for Semantic Text Similarity Analysis, A. P. Johnson, V. Holmes and, A. W. Qurashi, in 2020 InternationalConference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA),Novi Sad, SerbiaIEEE, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/INISTA49547.2020.9194665., , 2020
21. Quantifying the Effects of TextDuplication on Semantic Models, in, D. Mimno, L. Thompson and, A. Schofield, Proceedings of the 2017 Conference onEmpirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Copenhagen, Denmark:Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 2737–2747. doi:10.18653/v1/D17-1290, , 2017
22. SentiGANGenerating Sentimental Texts via MixtureAdversarial Networks, K. Wang and, X. Wan, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh InternationalJoint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, SwedenInternationalJoint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, pp.4446–4452. doi10.24963/ijcai.2018/618, , 2018
23. Tweet Sentiment Analysis of the 2020 U. S. Presidential Election, in, H. Yue and, E. Xia, H. Liu, Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference2021, Ljubljana SloveniaACM, pp. 367–371. doi:10.1145/3442442.3452322, , 2021
24. Deduplicating Training DataMitigates Privacy Risks in Language Models., N. Kandpal, E. Wallace and, C. Raffel, arXiv, Dec. 20, AccessedDec. 11, 2023.Online] Availablehttp://arxiv. org/abs/2202.06539, , 2022
25. RoBERTa-GRUA Hybrid DeepLearning Model for Enhanced Sentiment Analysis, K. L. Tan, K. M. Lim, C. P. Lee and, vol. 13, no. 6,p.3915, Mar. 2023, doi10.3390/app13063915, , 2023
26. Applications and Challenges of Sentiment Analysisin Real-life Scenarios, D. Kanojia and, A. Joshi, 2023, doi10.48550/ARXIV.2301.09912, , 2023
27. A Survey of Sentiment Analysis:Approaches, Datasets, and Future Research,, C. P. Lee and, K. L. Tan, K. M. Lim, vol. 13, no. 7, p.4550,, doi10.3390/app13074550, , 2023
28. SAKPA Korean Sentiment Analysis Model viaKnowledge Base and Prompt Tuning, Z. Zhang, H. Wen and, in 2023 IEEE 3rd InternationalConference on Computer Communication and Artificial Intelligence (CCAI),Taiyuan, ChinaIEEE, pp. 147–152. doi:10.1109/CCAI57533.2023.10201257, , 2023
29. Sentiment Analysis of Imbalanced Comment TextsUnder the Framework of BiLSTM, J. Zhao, H. Wen and, in 2023 6th International Conference onArtificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD), Chengdu, ChinaIEEE, pp. 312–319. doi10.1109/ICAIBD57115.2023.10206154, , 2023
30. Sentimentanalysis to support business decision-making. A bibliometric study, P. R. Palos-Sanchez and, R. Pozo-Barajas, J. A. Aguilar-Moreno, AIMSMath., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 4337–4375, 2024, doi10.3934/math.2024215, , 2024
31. Sentiment analysisA survey on designframework, applications and future scopes, M. Bordoloi and, S. K. Biswas, vol. 56, no. 11,pp. 12505–12560,, doi10.1007/s10462-023-10442-2, , 2023
32. Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERT, B. Du and, L. Ding, D. Tao, Q. Zhong, J. Liu, 2023 doi10.48550/ARXIV.2302.10198, , 2023
33. ASystematic Literature Review on Text Generation Using Deep NeuralNetwork Models, Z. Kastrati, A. Soomro, A. S. Imran, S. M. Daudpota and, N. Fatima, IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 53490–53503, 2022, doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3174108, , 2022
34. A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networks,, A. Maki and, M. Buda, M. A. Mazurowski, Neural Netw., vol. 106,pp. 249–259, doi10.1016/j. neunet.2018.07.011, , 2018
35. The impactof synthetic text generation for sentiment analysis using GAN based models, A. S. Imran, S. Shaikh, R. Yang, S. M. Daudpota and, Z. Kastrati, Egypt. Inform. J., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 547–557, doi:10.1016/j. eij.2022.05.006, , 2022
36. Sentiment Analysis of before and after Elections:Twitter Data of U. S. Election 2020,, H. N. Chaudhry et al., Electronics, vol. 10, no. 17, p. 2082, doi10.3390/electronics10172082, , 2021
37. Table Caption Generation in ScholarlyDocuments Leveraging Pre-trained Language Models., J. H. Xu, M. P. Kato, K. Shinden and, arXiv, Aug. 18, 2021. AccessedApr. 17, 2024Online Available http://arxiv. org/abs/2108.08111, , 2021
38. Imbalanced Text Sentiment Classification Based onMulti-Channel BLTCN-BLSTM Self-Attention, X. Zhang, T. Cai and, vol. 23, no. 4, p.2257,, doi10.3390/s23042257, , 2023
39. A ComprehensiveOverview and Comparative Analysis on Deep Learning ModelsCNN, RNN,LSTM, GRU., R. Mohamed, T. Perumal, N. Mustapha and, F. M. Shiri, 56 arXiv, 2023. AccessedOnline Available http//arxiv. org/abs/2305.17473, , 2024
40. Sentiment analysis ofimbalanced datasets using BERT and ensemble stacking for deep learning, H. Nouri, L. Hassouni, H. Anoun and, N. Habbat, vol. 126, p. 106999,, doi:10.1016/j. engappai.2023.106999, , 2023
41. Mitigating Class Imbalance in SentimentAnalysis through GPT-3-Generated Synthetic Sentences,, C. Suhaeni and, H.-S. Yong, vol. 13,no. 17, p. 9766,, doi10.3390/app13179766, , 2023
42. Enhancing Imbalanced Sentiment AnalysisAGPT-3-Based Sentence-by-Sentence Generation Approach,, C. Suhaeni and, H.-S. Yong, vol.14, no. 2, p. 622,, doi10.3390/app14020622, , 2024
43. Impact of Sentiment Analysis for the2020 U. S. Presidential Election on Social Media Data, in, M. Qorib, R. S. Gizaw and, J. Kim, Proceedings of the2023 8th International Conference on Machine Learning Technologies,Stockholm SwedenACM,, pp. 28–34. doi:10.1145/3589883.3589888, , 2023
44. Prediction and analysis of IndonesiaPresidential election from Twitter using sentiment analysis, M. Meiliana, W. Budiharto and, J. Big Data, vol.5, no. 1, p. 51, doi10.1186/s40537-018-0164-1, , 2018
45. Using AraGPT andensemble deep learning model for sentiment analysis on Arabic imbalanceddataset, H. Nouri, H. Anoun and, N. Habbat, L. Hassouni, ITM Web Conf., vol. 52, p. 02008, 2023, doi:10.1051/itmconf/20235202008, , 2008
46. Switch-GPTAn Effective Methodfor Constrained Text Generation under Few-Shot Settings (Student Abstract), G. Shen and, C. Ma, S. Zhang, Z. Deng, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 13011–13012,doi10.1609/aaai. v36i11.21642., , 2022
47. Sentiment analysis of COVID-19 tweets from selected hashtags in Nigeriausing VADER and Text Blob analyser, A. Abayomi-Alli, S. Misra and, O. Abiola, O. Abayomi-Alli, O. A. Tale, J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 5, , 2023
48. 44 Performance Evaluation of Sentiment Analysis on Balanced andImbalanced Dataset Using Ensemble Approach,, Avinashilingam, V. Srividhya, Department, S. George and, Coimbatore, Computer Science for Home Scienceand Higher Education for Women India vol.15, no. 17, pp. 790–797, doi10.17485/IJST/v15i17.2339., , 2022
49. Towards ImprovedClassification Accuracy on Highly Imbalanced Text Dataset Using DeepNeural Language Models, S. M. Daudpota, A. S. Imran and, Z. Kastrati, S. Shaikh, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 869, doi:10.3390/app11020869, , 2021
50. CrowdDecision MakingSparse Representation Guided by Sentiment Analysis forLeveraging the Wisdom of the Crowd, C. Zuheros, E. Martinez-Camara, F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma and, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst.,vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 369–379, Jan. 2023, doi10.1109/TSMC.2022.3180938., , 2023
51. CatGANCategory-Aware GenerativeAdversarial Networks with Hierarchical Evolutionary Learning for CategoryText Generation, J. Wang and, Z. Liu, Z. Liang, vol. 34, no. 05, pp. 8425–8432, doi10.1609/aaai. v34i05.6361, , 2020
52. Comparison between Machine Learning and Deep LearningApproaches for the Detection of Toxic Comments on Social Networks,, A. Bonetti, J. C. Torres, J. Vila-Francés, J. M. Vega, S. Pellerin and, M. Martínez-Sober, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 6038,, doi10.3390/app13106038., , 2023
53. Application of Generative Adversarial Networks andShapley Algorithm Based on Easy Data Augmentation for Imbalanced TextData, J.-L. Wu and, S. Huang, vol. 12, no. 21, p. 10964, doi:10.3390/app122110964, , 2022
54. Sentiment Analysis of Customers’ Reviews Using a HybridEvolutionary SVM-Based Approach in an Imbalanced Data Distribution, R. Obiedat et al., IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 22260–22273, 2022, doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3149482, , 2022
55. Training neural network classifiers for medical decision making:The effects of imbalanced datasets on classification performance,, M. A. Mazurowski, J. Y. Lo, J. M. Zurada, J. A. Baker and, G. D. Tourassi, P. A. Habas, NeuralNetw., vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 427–436, , 2008