RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지역제도와 중견국가

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76536293

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper explores middle powers’ assertive diplomacy regarding regional institution building. Regional integration is generally considered as a niche for middle powers since major powers are more interested in global affairs while weak powers lack resources for diplomatic activism. Regional institutions not only have lock-in effects against major powers but also reduce transaction costs for regional cooperation. However, middle powers show divergent preferences and strategies toward regional institutions. This paper explains this diversity with differences in several domestic and external factors. The case study of four types of middle powers, i.e., regional hegemonic powers (Brazil, India, and South Africa), traditional middle powers (Australia and Canada), Nordic middle powers (Sweden, Norway, Finland), shows that external factors like relationship with the global hegemon and relative power position in the region, and domestic receptiveness toward neoliberalism largely determines diplomatic activism toward regional integration and preference for binding regional institutions.
    번역하기

    This paper explores middle powers’ assertive diplomacy regarding regional institution building. Regional integration is generally considered as a niche for middle powers since major powers are more interested in global affairs while weak powers lack...

    This paper explores middle powers’ assertive diplomacy regarding regional institution building. Regional integration is generally considered as a niche for middle powers since major powers are more interested in global affairs while weak powers lack resources for diplomatic activism. Regional institutions not only have lock-in effects against major powers but also reduce transaction costs for regional cooperation. However, middle powers show divergent preferences and strategies toward regional institutions. This paper explains this diversity with differences in several domestic and external factors. The case study of four types of middle powers, i.e., regional hegemonic powers (Brazil, India, and South Africa), traditional middle powers (Australia and Canada), Nordic middle powers (Sweden, Norway, Finland), shows that external factors like relationship with the global hegemon and relative power position in the region, and domestic receptiveness toward neoliberalism largely determines diplomatic activism toward regional integration and preference for binding regional institutions.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 최영종, "지역통합의 비교론적 연구: 유럽, 미주, 동아시아를 중심으로" 고려대학교 평화연구소 9 : 2000

    2 배병인, "정치적 거래비용과 초국가적 기구로의 권한 위임: 신자유주의적 제도주의 비판과 대안" 한국국제정치학회 48 (48): 53-78, 2008

    3 Burges, Sean, "Without Sticks or Carrots: Brazilian Leadership in South America During the Cardoso Era, 1992-2003" 25 (25): 2006

    4 Grieco, Joseph M., "Understanding the Problem of International Cooperation: The Limits of Neoliberal Institutionalism and the Future of Realist Theory, in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate" Columbia University Press 1993

    5 Neumann, Iver B., "This little piggy stayed at home: Why Norway is not a member of the EU, in European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of Nordic States" Routledge 2002

    6 Hurrell, Andrew, "The United States and Brazil: Comparative Reflections, in The United States and Brazil: The Long Road of Unmet Expectations" Routledge 2005

    7 Lee, Margaret C., "The Political Economy of Regionalism in Southern Africa" Lynne Rienner Publishers 2003

    8 Krasner, Stephan D., "Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regime as Intervening Variables, in International Regimes" Cornell University Press 1983

    9 Gibbs, Richard, "Southern Africa in Transition: Prospects and Problems Facing Regional Integration" 36 (36): 1998

    10 Alden, Chris, "South Africa’s Post-Apartheid Foreign Policy: From Reconciliation to Revival" Oxford University Press 2003

    1 최영종, "지역통합의 비교론적 연구: 유럽, 미주, 동아시아를 중심으로" 고려대학교 평화연구소 9 : 2000

    2 배병인, "정치적 거래비용과 초국가적 기구로의 권한 위임: 신자유주의적 제도주의 비판과 대안" 한국국제정치학회 48 (48): 53-78, 2008

    3 Burges, Sean, "Without Sticks or Carrots: Brazilian Leadership in South America During the Cardoso Era, 1992-2003" 25 (25): 2006

    4 Grieco, Joseph M., "Understanding the Problem of International Cooperation: The Limits of Neoliberal Institutionalism and the Future of Realist Theory, in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate" Columbia University Press 1993

    5 Neumann, Iver B., "This little piggy stayed at home: Why Norway is not a member of the EU, in European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of Nordic States" Routledge 2002

    6 Hurrell, Andrew, "The United States and Brazil: Comparative Reflections, in The United States and Brazil: The Long Road of Unmet Expectations" Routledge 2005

    7 Lee, Margaret C., "The Political Economy of Regionalism in Southern Africa" Lynne Rienner Publishers 2003

    8 Krasner, Stephan D., "Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regime as Intervening Variables, in International Regimes" Cornell University Press 1983

    9 Gibbs, Richard, "Southern Africa in Transition: Prospects and Problems Facing Regional Integration" 36 (36): 1998

    10 Alden, Chris, "South Africa’s Post-Apartheid Foreign Policy: From Reconciliation to Revival" Oxford University Press 2003

    11 Hurrell, Andrew, "Some Reflections on the Role of Intermediate Powers in International Institutions" Latin American Program, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars 2000

    12 Cooper, "Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order" UBC Press 1993

    13 Frankel, Jeffrey A., "Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System" IIE 1997

    14 Kellog, Paul, "Regional Integration in Latin America: Dawn of an Alternative to Neoliberalism?" 29 (29): 2007

    15 Narlikar, Amrita, "Peculiar chauvinism or Strategic Calculation? Explaining the Negotiating Strategy of a Rising India" 82 (82): 2006

    16 Ingebritsen, Christine, "Nordic States and European Unity" Cornell University Press 1998

    17 Cooper, Andrew, "Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War" Macmillan Press 1997

    18 Lechina, Gladys, "Middle Powers: IBSA and the New South-South Cooperation" NACLA Report on the Americas 2007

    19 Belanger, Louis, "Middle Powers and Regionalism in the Americas: The Cases of Argentina and Mexico" In Cooper 1997

    20 Guedes, Marcos Aurelio de Oliveira, "Mercosur: Political Development and Comparative Issues with the European Union"

    21 Mukhametdinov, Mikhail, "Mercosur and the European Union: Variation among the Factors of Regional Cohesion" 42 (42): 2007

    22 Hansen, Lene, "Introduction, in European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of Nordic States" Routledge 2002

    23 Mayer, Frederick W., "Interpreting NAFTA" Columbia University Press 1998

    24 Goldstein, Judith, "International Law and Domestic Institutions: Reconciling North Americas Unfair Trade Laws" 50 (50): 1996

    25 Cohen, Stephen, "India: Emerging Power" Brookings Institution 2001

    26 Carranza, Mario E., "Can Mercosur Survive? Domestic and International Constraints on Mercosur" 45 (45): 2003

    27 Funabashi, Yoichi, "Asia Pacific Fusion: Japans Role in APEC" Institute for International Economics 1995

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-05-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of International Politics KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.89 0.89 0.76
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.92 0.77 1.225 0.45
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼